The Religious Freedom Argument Is a Sham
We must continuously challenge the idea that we are the aggressors in the current culture wars.
BY DASHANNE STOKES
AUGUST 01 2016 5:33 AM EDT
I never forgot the look in their eyes: the expressions of contempt and disgust mixed with laughter, the obscene gestures, the slurs wielded like weapons. That was the aftermath of my close friend John confiding to our Boy Scout camp director that he is gay.
It was only a matter of weeks before they kicked John out of the Boy Scouts. As a closeted bisexual Eagle Scout, the impact hit me like a shock wave. For nearly two decades after that, I lived in a prison of fear. Headline after headline told me about L.G.B.T. people being attacked and killed. This year, as I was in the process of coming out during the Orlando massacre, religious leaders like Pastor Roger Jimenez praised the shooter, claiming that the only tragedy is that more of them didnt die. To add insult to injury, gay leaders like Greg Bourke continued to be denied membership in the Boy Scouts under a new policy, ratified a year ago this past week, which enables such discrimination under fanciful claims of toleration and respect.
The wave of religious freedom bills that swept the country this past year reveal that what transpired in the Boy Scouts was not an isolated event. We are witnessing a power play being sold to the American public through coded language and hype.
According to the resolution by which the Boy Scouts new policy was passed, The message of Scouting is one of toleration and respect.
Any effort to exclude or penalize chartering organizations based on their beliefs or policies regarding marriage, family, or sexuality is contrary to the Boy Scouts of Americas commitment to religious freedom. Think about that for a moment. Think about the language theyre using, what it is theyre really saying.
http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2016/8/01/religious-freedom-argument-sham