Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumTravel ban judges scrutinize Trump's Muslim statements
Source: Associated Press
Travel ban judges scrutinize Trumps Muslim statements
By GENE JOHNSON
25 minutes ago
SEATTLE (AP) Federal judges on Monday peppered a lawyer for President Donald Trump with questions about whether the administrations travel ban discriminates against Muslims and zeroed in on the presidents campaign statements, the second time in a week the rhetoric has faced judicial scrutiny.
Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who is defending the travel ban, told a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that over time, the president clarified that what he was talking about was Islamic terrorist groups and the countries that sponsor or shelter them. He argued that the executive order halting travel from six majority Muslim nations doesnt say anything about religion, and neither the state of Hawaii nor an imam from that state who wants his mother-in-law to visit has standing to sue.
This order is aimed at aliens abroad, who themselves dont have constitutional rights, Wall said in a hearing broadcast live on C-Span and other news stations.
Neal Katyal, who represented Hawaii, scoffed at that argument and said Trump had repeatedly spoke of a Muslim ban during the presidential campaign and after.
This is a repeated pattern of the president, Katyal said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By GENE JOHNSON
25 minutes ago
SEATTLE (AP) Federal judges on Monday peppered a lawyer for President Donald Trump with questions about whether the administrations travel ban discriminates against Muslims and zeroed in on the presidents campaign statements, the second time in a week the rhetoric has faced judicial scrutiny.
Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who is defending the travel ban, told a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that over time, the president clarified that what he was talking about was Islamic terrorist groups and the countries that sponsor or shelter them. He argued that the executive order halting travel from six majority Muslim nations doesnt say anything about religion, and neither the state of Hawaii nor an imam from that state who wants his mother-in-law to visit has standing to sue.
This order is aimed at aliens abroad, who themselves dont have constitutional rights, Wall said in a hearing broadcast live on C-Span and other news stations.
Neal Katyal, who represented Hawaii, scoffed at that argument and said Trump had repeatedly spoke of a Muslim ban during the presidential campaign and after.
This is a repeated pattern of the president, Katyal said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://apnews.com/014c71ac88de41de83cde7471801127a/Travel-ban-judges-scrutinize-Trump's-Muslim-statements
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Travel ban judges scrutinize Trump's Muslim statements (Original Post)
Eugene
May 2017
OP
"...talking about was Islamic terrorist groups and the countries that sponsor or shelter them"
trotsky
May 2017
#1
This order is aimed at aliens abroad, who themselves dont have constitutional rights,
Lordquinton
May 2017
#2
trotsky
(49,533 posts)1. "...talking about was Islamic terrorist groups and the countries that sponsor or shelter them"
Which is a lie, because then Saudi Arabia would have been on the list.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)2. This order is aimed at aliens abroad, who themselves dont have constitutional rights,
There is so much wrong with this statement, I can't even start to unpack it.
