Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumSt. Louis Archdiocese, others sue city over abortion anti-discrimination ordinance
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/st-louis-archdiocese-others-sue-city-over-abortion-anti-discrimination/article_09651b13-910e-5307-b892-1961103c7216.html--------------------
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis and other organizations filed suit Monday against the city, seeking to overturn a new ordinance that adds peoples reproductive health decisions to the list of things for which its illegal to discriminate in employment and housing.
Supporters of the ordinance, in effect since February, say it is meant to prevent employers or landlords from discriminating against women who have had or are considering abortions. Opponents say it would force the church and other groups that fundamentally oppose abortion to effectively sanction it. One equated it to forcing Planned Parenthood to staff its front desk with anti-abortion activists.
The measure effectively makes women who have had or plan to have abortions a protected class, like racial or ethnic minorities, thus barring employers or landlords from using that factor to deny them employment or housing. The Board of Aldermen passed it last year and then-Mayor Francis Slay signed it into law Feb. 10.
Plaintiffs in the federal suit are seeking an immediate injunction against enforcement of the ordinance and its eventual invalidation as unconstitutional. Archbishop Robert Carlson vowed that the archdiocese wont adhere to the law even if that effort fails.
Supporters of the ordinance, in effect since February, say it is meant to prevent employers or landlords from discriminating against women who have had or are considering abortions. Opponents say it would force the church and other groups that fundamentally oppose abortion to effectively sanction it. One equated it to forcing Planned Parenthood to staff its front desk with anti-abortion activists.
The measure effectively makes women who have had or plan to have abortions a protected class, like racial or ethnic minorities, thus barring employers or landlords from using that factor to deny them employment or housing. The Board of Aldermen passed it last year and then-Mayor Francis Slay signed it into law Feb. 10.
Plaintiffs in the federal suit are seeking an immediate injunction against enforcement of the ordinance and its eventual invalidation as unconstitutional. Archbishop Robert Carlson vowed that the archdiocese wont adhere to the law even if that effort fails.
--------------------
Still fighting for the right to hate and discriminate. Stay classy, RCC.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 4157 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
St. Louis Archdiocese, others sue city over abortion anti-discrimination ordinance (Original Post)
trotsky
May 2017
OP
Hiring a person who has had an abortion is the same as sanctioning it?
Act_of_Reparation
May 2017
#4
Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)1. Paging Stretch Armstrong!
Opponents say it would force the church and other groups that fundamentally oppose abortion to effectively sanction it.
Please explain.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)2. Religious privilege.
That's why.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)3. They are so disconnected from reality
"One equated it to forcing Planned Parenthood to staff its front desk with anti-abortion activists."
No Francis, it simply means they can't kick to the curb women who have made private, medical decisions.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)4. Hiring a person who has had an abortion is the same as sanctioning it?
What fucking planet are these people from?