Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumFirst Evidence of a Cult in Judah at Time of King David
ScienceDaily (May 8, 2012) Prof. Yosef Garfinkel, the Yigal Yadin Professor of Archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, announced May 8 the discovery of objects that for the first time shed light on how a cult was organized in Judah at the time of King David. During recent archaeological excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa, a fortified city in Judah adjacent to the Valley of Elah, Garfinkel and colleagues uncovered rich assemblages of pottery, stone and metal tools, and many art and cult objects. These include three large rooms that served as cultic shrines, which in their architecture and finds correspond to the biblical description of a cult at the time of King David.
This discovery is extraordinary as it is the first time that shrines from the time of early biblical kings were uncovered. Because these shrines pre-date the construction of Solomon's temple in Jerusalem by 30 to 40 years, they provide the first physical evidence of a cult in the time of King David, with significant implications for the fields of archaeology, history, biblical and religion studies.
~"snip"~
The biblical tradition presents the people of Israel as conducting a cult different from all other nations of the ancient Near East by being monotheistic and an-iconic (banning human or animal figures). However, it is not clear when these practices were formulated, if indeed during the time of the monarchy (10-6th centuries BC), or only later, in the Persian or Hellenistic eras.
The absence of cultic images of humans or animals in the three shrines provides evidence that the inhabitants of the place practiced a different cult than that of the Canaanites or the Philistines, observing a ban on graven images.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120508103803.html
______________________________________________
Interesting article; not nearly long enough, but makes reference to Footsteps of King David in the Valley of Elah, which covers five years of excavations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1725 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First Evidence of a Cult in Judah at Time of King David (Original Post)
Adsos Letter
May 2012
OP
intaglio
(8,170 posts)1. I always find it amusing about this sort of archaology
that they confidently say "time of King David" when there is no evidence of a King David outside the Bible except one (heavily disputed) pot sherd with letters that possibly transliterate as "Dwd". It is like trying to date items in the UK with reference to "King Arthur".
dimbear
(6,271 posts)2. Yahoo's ANE group has lots of things to say about this....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ANE-2/messages
That's a great group in general....
Note it's not at all certain that this settlement is Judean. Garfinkel is a well known maximalist, take with salt.
In particular, check out the famed ostracon. Which you can see in all its glory at wikisource. It's about as interpretable as the Voynich manuscript.
Fun.
That's a great group in general....
Note it's not at all certain that this settlement is Judean. Garfinkel is a well known maximalist, take with salt.
In particular, check out the famed ostracon. Which you can see in all its glory at wikisource. It's about as interpretable as the Voynich manuscript.
Fun.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)4. Thanks for the link.
tanyev
(42,552 posts)3. marking to read later