Religion
Related: About this forumDo you ever get the impression you're being ignored?
You might just be right.
http://www.pewforum.org/2018/04/25/when-americans-say-they-believe-in-god-what-do-they-mean/
dhol82
(9,352 posts)What am I, chopped liver?
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)are fairy tales and rules to control people by.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)the cashier and bagger were just talkin' away..until, i'm sure the bagger FELT my body language..like all of sudden...would you like help out to the car?? - Maybe an "aura" was all around
me...a halo effect....NOT!!!!
Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)Looks like our work here is having an effect.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)Yup. Not a surprise.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Correct?
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)Just very unlikely with respect to this particular delusion.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)but not in this area.
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)Last edited Sat May 19, 2018, 08:44 AM - Edit history (1)
And within them.
And between them and science.
And then all the historical deaths they have caused....
You must added all that up, and decided that yes, this is something you absolutely trust and believe, absolutely, faithfully and without question?
Or did you originally buy it all, without thinking much, as a child? Because the preachers seemed so nice, and before you developed a critical adult mind, they told you their teachings were perfect?
And once your brain was washed as a child, few have the strength and independence to break away.
And now with serene vanity, ignoring all problems, ... you extol its wonders; endlessly.
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)You now believe, without any doubt, in gods that intervene to protect you?
That is the 77% item I responded to as delusional. Did you not understand that? Do you understand that your assertion that you believe in gods that directly intervene in this world contradicts some of your other statements about your faith in this forum?
It is almost as if you fit your statements here about whatever it is that you believe to whatever point you happen to be arguing. But that level of sophistry would be blatantly dishonest. You must have just misunderstood what the 77% referred to.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Your previous reply was somewhat vague. So that is on you to be more specific.
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)in that list. But if you misunderstood that is fine, you certainly have the opportunity to, for once, correct and clarify your own statements here.
Do you believe that there is, as 77% of Americans do, an interventionist god that protects them?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)and then read #15 in context.
We were talking solely about the possibility of being deluded in general.
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)As usual you have some other version of English with your own definitions of common words.
13. No I accept that is possible.
Just very unlikely with respect to this particular delusion.
15. I also accpet that possibility for myself,
but not in this area.
WTF?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Well, since I asked:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/01/10-facts-about-atheists/
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)While it's possible (though unlikely) for an atheist to believe in an afterlife or reincarnation, say, believing in gods or universal spirits is right out.
Believe what you want, but the definition of atheism is clear and binary.
Atheism: a-theism, i.e. without theism, i.e., no gods. No more, no less.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)would you tell them that they are not?
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)But by the common definition of both atheism and napoleon they are neither.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Interesting.
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)It is the condition of not believing in any gods.
It has a simple and precise definition, as does the condition of being Napoleon Bonaparte. Note that theism has a similar property. One either believes in one or more gods that exist in the world or one does not.
The property Christian on the other hand is ambiguous, there is no concise definition. If you can provide an objective rule for who is or is not a Christian, other than they claim to be Christians, we can use that to categorize people.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I accept that self-definition.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)with the actual definitions of words.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)so as to confuse the issue. What exactly is a "universal spirit"? It's not the same thing as a god, because those respondents were asked if they believe in a god or in a "universal spirit". Those who believe in "universal spirits" but who don't believe in any gods are atheists.
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)Or the spirit of rational inquiry, I guess.
Or a spirit that wasn't a god?
Mariana
(14,854 posts)It's weird they used such vague wording, unless it was done intentionally to elicit more "Yes" answers.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)In something they can't even define except to say what it isn't.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)so of course those definitions would not be given and would not appear in the survey report.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Which usually means their own personal interpretation, and leads to things like "Atheists believe in god!"
Mariana
(14,854 posts)to skew the results. Ask a group of people "Do you believe in a god?" and you'll get X people who say yes. Ask those same people "Do you believe in a god or in a (conveniently undefined) universal spirit?" then you'll get X + Y people who say yes. Then you imply they all believe in pretty much the same thing.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)And also familiar...
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Are you the official definer?
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)as much as you claim to be.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)You made a statement that implies much.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)and your deflections are pathetically transparent.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Referring to your earlier pronouncement on what is the sole official acceptable definition of atheism.
The very definitive illustration of the no true Scotsman fallacy in action.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)You must be thinking of one of your posts.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Considering that it happened very recently.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)While I have your attention, can you answer the question I asked here?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I saw it as a tactic on your part.
And I still do.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Yes it is a tactic. I ask direct questions and theists deflect, reframe, and hurl abuse to get out of answering them.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Can you answer the one I linked above?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)and there are statements followed by a question mark.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Rather straight forward one at that.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)or was out there somewhere but absolutely has no relationship with us or the universe or the whatever, completely ambivalent to our existence?
Wouldn't that be an atheist - not an "I-don't-know-for-sure agnostic" - but most definitely not a theist?
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)I don't know if anything might have preceded the Big Bang (if that question even makes sense), or if there's a multiverse. Maybe I'll never know. That's perfectly fine.
It's when you start making up stories with no evidence other than that you'd like them to be true or because you feel there has to be a purpose to it all, that's when you leave the path of wisdom.
"I don't know": A perfectly acceptable and honest answer, until such a time as evidence can be presented and examined.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But if that indefinable something was a creative force, the prime mover, I would argue that we are arguing over wording.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)And so if you ask about each of them separately, people will respond differently to each.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)Your "indefinable something" reminds me of the vague, rather meaningless "nature's god" mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. And the "universal spirit" asked about in the survey Gil is going on about. Those are other ways to say "indefinable something".
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)I've long ago resigned from the debating society, but if they were to ask me if I considered them atheists, I would say I didn't.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)They asked about "God or a universal spirit." Some people may believe that a universal spirit is not a god. Others may affiliate themselves with a religion and so not call themselves atheists but they might not believe in God.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Thus the different answers.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Clearly, it isn't the same thing as a god, since respondents were asked if they believe in a god or a universal spirit. If they don't believe in any gods but do believe in a "universal spirit", then they are indeed atheists. There is no conflict, they are using the word correctly.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)A collective consciousness?
Mariana
(14,854 posts)It would be interesting to know what the participants in the survey, the ones who believe there is such a thing, think it means.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,868 posts)Or he will send you to eternal damnation.
Why?
Because he loves you.
(apologies to G Carlin)
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/04/half-uk-population-has-no-religion-british-social-attitudes-survey
The drop suggests a far sharper decrease than in previous years, the Times says. Britons' belief in God has long been in decline, but at a rate of about one per cent a year, the newspaper reports, citing a different question used by the British Attitudes Survey in 1991, which found half the population thought there was a god.
By 2008 the number of believers had fallen to about 35 per cent, suggesting a roughly one per cent decline per annum.
Meanwhile the proportion of atheists people who say they do not actively believe in any kind of god has risen from 33 per cent to 38 per cent.
http://www.theweek.co.uk/80065/belief-in-god-plunges-after-torrid-year
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)About as much as, or more than, existing raw numbers.