Religion
Related: About this forumWill they ever again be seen as credible moral agents after the last two years?
Morality Morality We don't need no morality.
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)Ever saw themselves as such. Normal folks did not.
wryter2000
(46,025 posts)And why should they? They never stood for any real moral positions
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)IMHO whenever a spokesperson for either appears to proclaim in public they should be greeted with signs and jeers pointing out how they can no longer 'speak in the name of Christ.'
Voltaire2
(12,990 posts)parties. See the recent death of Billy Graham. See every presidential candidate explicitly uttering avowals of sincere religiosity at every opportunity.
MineralMan
(146,282 posts)None of them.
The vast majority of well-known religious leaders are self-serving hypocrites who seek publicity and fame. I do not trust such people, nor consider them to be credible.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...credible in the first place.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Study after study has shown that Christians generally consider Christians to be more moral and trustworthy than everyone else.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Religion - even in some of its very bad forms - is defended against perceived attacks by atheists.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)Credible moral agents would not trip over each other to defend and glorify a man like Donald Trump. Credible moral agents would not fleece the elderly on fixed incomes to enrich themselves. Credible moral agents would not blame natural disasters on people who are sexually attracted to others of their own sex. Credible moral agents wouldn't have extramarital affairs on Saturday night and Sunday morning condemn "sinners." These people have warped views of morality.