Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hlthe2b

(102,231 posts)
1. Too bad they probably won't have security cameras up to catch/record the inevitable vandals...
Wed May 30, 2012, 02:29 PM
May 2012

in the act.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. They are hoping to put more up across the city.
Wed May 30, 2012, 02:33 PM
May 2012

This is a San Diego church that put up similar signs after Prop 8.

They are collecting donations for more signs and hope to keep them up until the Democratic Convention.

Here's a more in-depth story.

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/california-church-plans-billboard-charlotte-offeri/nPGCk/

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
3. By the time you're done reading all that
Wed May 30, 2012, 02:34 PM
May 2012

Last edited Wed May 30, 2012, 03:49 PM - Edit history (1)

you'll be PARKED on the billboard!


rocktivity

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
5. I think this is great and all.
Wed May 30, 2012, 02:37 PM
May 2012

But I seem to remember a thread in here right after the vote about religion causing the outcome and some really pissed off religious people that denied that reality.

 

daaron

(763 posts)
6. It was about that time -->
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:22 PM
May 2012

I joined up w/DU forums. As a liberal agnostic Christian and longtime Randi.org lurker, it really seemed like the R&S needed some moderating influences willing and able to raise the bar on the level of discourse... every which way.

As I recall, the issue was whether or not liberal Christians were enabling RW fundies by not protesting strenuously enough, which left some believers defensive in response to the (understandable if misdirected) outrage of non-believers and Rainbow-letters folk. "Rancorous" is too kind a word for the ensuing flame-war.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
9. I just noticed that your sig is animated.
Wed May 30, 2012, 05:27 PM
May 2012

Watching the image loop and seeing that little sailboat journey off into the sunset is entertaining!

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
8. That was a different one.
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:34 PM
May 2012

I'm talking about this one (I think--just a quick search; didn't read through it all to see if it was the one I was actually remembering).

http://www.democraticunderground.com/121826165#top

 

daaron

(763 posts)
11. Ayup. That one too!
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:21 AM
May 2012

Few of the liberal Christians I know bother with the OT at all, and most consider the majority of the OT as mythology mingled with old torah... the context and background, as it were. Where they go from there (NT forward) varies quite a bit.

Personally, I'm a little amazed that apocryphal and extra-biblical Christian texts, along with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hammadi texts, hasn't had a more profound influence on open-minded (read: potentially liberal) Christians. They surely had an impact on the specific shape of my own belief, in that they demonstrate unequivocally that early Christianity was a highly diverse community, with many local varieties influenced by local belief systems.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
10. Tangentially related...
Wed May 30, 2012, 05:44 PM
May 2012

I can't speak for anyone else here, but to me, liberal believers enable the RW fundies not by not protesting strenuously enough, but by protecting them from criticism of their nutty beliefs.

Probably the only decent thing Sam Harris ever wrote was the concentric circles of diminishing reasonableness. In it, he does a decent job of describing how that protection occurs.

 

daaron

(763 posts)
12. Hm. Seems to me that your standard is lower than mine. :)
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:29 AM
May 2012

I have little patience for any Christian, liberal or not, protecting RW fundie 'nutty beliefs' from criticism. It's GOT to be our job (speaking as a U.S.American first and Christian second) to throw the fundies to the proverbial lions -- to not only refrain from protecting fundies from criticism, but to be the ones engaging in the most vociferous criticism of their despicable interpretation of scripture.

I confess that I don't see enough of that going on, but it's what I do, and it's what I encourage my fellow Christians to do when the topics come up. Perhaps working together believers and nons can pull some sort of epic rope-a-dope on these fuckers.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
13. Examples of what I'm talking about can be seen in this very group.
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:05 PM
May 2012

Posters lauding religion for providing motivation to do good works while refusing to acknowledge the role religion plays in motivating people to do terrible things--the "give credit but never ascribe blame" mentality prevents discussion of how endorsing religious beliefs/faith as a good source of motivation enables the fundies.

I don't recall when you joined, but you may have seen the post by 2ndamforcomputers, "Say to my face that religion had nothing to do with what happened in North Carolina." In that thread, more than one person argued that the sincerely held religious beliefs of RW fundamentalists played no role in the passage of Amendment One. While I'm sure those who did that are lovely people who mean well and see their religion as a positive force in their lives and generally, their unwillingness to cite religion as a powerful motivation behind the homophobes of North Carolina prevents the relevant beliefs from being criticized.

I'm not sure that I've explained myself that clearly, and if I haven't, I apologize.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Billboard to be erected o...