Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
Sat Jan 4, 2020, 02:16 AM Jan 2020

Vision of the Gods



There's more to this story. Found on:



The essential new details are that the female was an attractive girl dancing on a moonstone, and that when the music she was dancing to stopped, she vanished suddenly... but not suddenly enough to disturb the cameramen. They continued to tour the temple, but found themselves obsessed with the girl they had filmed, so they asked the Sinhalese assistant (Mr. De Zilwa) to ask the worshipers who she was; but everyone he asked quietly and quickly avoided him.

Eventually the four men cornered a native and questioned him about the girl; shaking, he said he knew of no girl... but there was 'death woman' who appeared and danced on the steps each year, and all who saw her were accursed. The men felt that the locals were just being either ignorant or just avoiding telling them who the girl was... but it was also very clear that by now they were being watched very closely by the crowd, so they decided they should depart before anything nasty happened.

http://anomalyinfo.com/Stories/pre-1940-dancing-girl-ceylon
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vision of the Gods (Original Post) Cartoonist Jan 2020 OP
"Stop talking and start cranking..." Layzeebeaver Jan 2020 #1
+ 1 to the 10th power. 3Hotdogs Jan 2020 #2
"I say, where did she go?" 3Hotdogs Jan 2020 #3
On a side note edhopper Jan 2020 #4
A very fine artist. Cartoonist Jan 2020 #6
Yes edhopper Jan 2020 #7
"We're not balmy, are we?" "What are you giving him a balm for? It might bite him!" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #5
Slowed film stock missed moving figures in poor light? Bretton Garcia Jan 2020 #8
Old photographic sensitivity to light was low, slow Bretton Garcia Jan 2020 #9
So much photographic "evidence" of the supernatural... Act_of_Reparation Jan 2020 #10
Absolutely Bretton Garcia Jan 2020 #11

edhopper

(33,570 posts)
4. On a side note
Sat Jan 4, 2020, 11:33 AM
Jan 2020

this was drawn by Everett Raymond Kinstler an illustrator and comic artist who became one of the top Portrait Artists in America. Painting celebrities and people of power. Including every president from Carter to Trump.

http://everettraymondkinstler.com/wordpress/

Ray passed away last year at the age of 94.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
6. A very fine artist.
Sat Jan 4, 2020, 01:34 PM
Jan 2020

His work was too good for comics. He used fine lines that reproduced poorly in that medium. His best work would be found on the inside front cover, where it would be printed on gloss stock.

edhopper

(33,570 posts)
7. Yes
Sat Jan 4, 2020, 02:10 PM
Jan 2020

He wanted to be a great illustrator like James M. Flagg or Gibson. He figured out in the 50s that the day of the great illustrator was vanishing and moved to portraiture. And became great. He adopted the style of artists like Sargent and Chase.
Here is a nice one of his dear friend Tony Bennett.


muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
5. "We're not balmy, are we?" "What are you giving him a balm for? It might bite him!"
Sat Jan 4, 2020, 12:06 PM
Jan 2020


"Well, there is an animal called a balm ... or did I dream it?"

I note that while seeing the "death woman" cursed the viewer, the link goes on to mention Charles Brooke Farrar survived more than 40 years after this, to the age of 80.

Bretton Garcia

(970 posts)
8. Slowed film stock missed moving figures in poor light?
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:37 PM
Jan 2020

1) Early film was not too sensitive. And what with 2) a moving figure, 3) in veils, 4) indoors, 5) in changing weather conditions, a dancing figure did not appear on the film. But immobile architecture did.

What was 6) a dancing girl doing there? Many ancient temples were in part filled with prostitutes, sex workers. 7) Though some didn't want this to be known.

Bretton Garcia

(970 posts)
9. Old photographic sensitivity to light was low, slow
Tue Jan 7, 2020, 07:27 AM
Jan 2020

Often you had to open the shutter, and expose the photographic material to light for some time. Even for more than a full minute. As in modern "time exposures."

And so if anything moved in that period, it blurred, faded. Or if it moved pretty fast? It would never appear in the negatives or final pictures at all.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
10. So much photographic "evidence" of the supernatural...
Tue Jan 7, 2020, 09:33 AM
Jan 2020

...are just cases of people not knowing how cameras work.

Bretton Garcia

(970 posts)
11. Absolutely
Tue Jan 7, 2020, 03:46 PM
Jan 2020

Most religious ideas in fact, may come about from people failing to more precisely understand complicated things in nature, technology, psychology. As naturalistic theories tell us.

As far as the old film-based photography goes? Consider what you can get from a "double exposure." If you took 1) a picture of a temple in India, 2) and then forgot to advance the film, you might shoot a picture of your Aunt Mildred on top of the temple picture. And get a print of a ghostly Mildred, hovering above the temple.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Vision of the Gods