Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Why Syzygy

(18,928 posts)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 09:04 PM Nov 2012

‘Enormously insensitive’ to hurt God’s feelings by not using oil

Put on your stupid repellant for this one.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/30/bryan-fischer-enormously-insensitive-to-hurt-gods-feelings-by-not-using-oil/

"Bryan Fischer, the director of issues analysis of the conservative fundamentalist American Family Association, on Thursday told a so-called “expert” who denies climate change that not using God’s fossil fuels would be like “crushing” someone’s feelings by rejecting their birthday present.

The Cornwall Alliance’s Calvin Beisner, who has previously said that believing in climate change “is an insult to God,” explained on Thursday that the Bible said it was also very rude to not use oil, coal and natural gas."



What about us Sun worshipers? Dear old Sol feels hurt every time you put gas in your vehicle!


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Enormously insensitive’ to hurt God’s feelings by not using oil (Original Post) Why Syzygy Nov 2012 OP
Same as not using hemp ? n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #1
"I talk a lot about God, but my real religion is Exxon!" struggle4progress Nov 2012 #2
. Why Syzygy Nov 2012 #7
My brain will NOT let me believe that these nitwits Suich Nov 2012 #3
Nope Why Syzygy Nov 2012 #8
The Gospel according to Exxon. rug Nov 2012 #4
Wow - I've rarely seen such a dishonestly named enterprise muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #11
My friends, understand the true meaning of the Parable of the Foolish Virgins: dimbear Nov 2012 #5
I wonder how his god feels about Fischer not using his brain?? Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #6
The correct response to something like that is mindwalker_i Nov 2012 #9
not an insult to god Phillip McCleod Dec 2012 #10
That is some of the most twisted logic I have heard. cbayer Dec 2012 #12

Why Syzygy

(18,928 posts)
8. Nope
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 10:53 PM
Nov 2012

I don't doubt it for a nano. Don't you realize how important these two idiots are to Gawd? They're all speshul to the big guy!

muriel_volestrangler

(105,834 posts)
11. Wow - I've rarely seen such a dishonestly named enterprise
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:35 AM
Dec 2012

A more appropriate name would be 'Ministew' - and just as Minipax was in charge of waging war, the Ministry of Stewardship is a leading advocate for pollution. Despite their claim to be interested in some form of 'stewardship', such as fighting malaria, literally the only things they've said in their past 4 years of press releases is that global warming doesn't exist, pollution controls are expensive and thus unbiblical and wrong, and saving lives can't be called 'pro-life', because that phrase has been copyrighted by politicians who are against abortion, and some of them are also pro-pollution.

Seriously, I think the Koch brothers (whom I'd suspect of bankrolling that 'Cornwall' crap) are publicly more 'pro-environment' than those guys.

But, yeah, anyone signing up to that is more in favour of Exxon than Jesus.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
9. The correct response to something like that is
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:51 PM
Nov 2012

Sir, that came from your ass. It came directly from your ass, it did not pass go, it did not collect $200.

 

Phillip McCleod

(1,837 posts)
10. not an insult to god
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:12 AM
Dec 2012

'hey god, you are one heartless nonexistent tool for stupefying rubes'.

now that's an insult to god.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»‘Enormously insensitive’ ...