Religion
Related: About this forummay i ask as a curious noob.. any past nonbelieving hosts of DU religion?
i honestly don't know and just wondered. studies have shown that atheists etc know at least as much if not much more about religious traditions as their believing fellow human beings.
ps.. this is my 1st thread attempt in 'religion' so plz take it easy. let's be curious people with each other for once is how it seems around here. myself included.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I am not sure what you are asking here. I was a nonbelieving Religion host in the past, and I am currently a nonbelieving Religion host.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)and i'm just plain glad to hear it.
now that that's out of the way what do you say to a re-introduction session. we all interact almost every day and i don't know the first thing about any of you. i feel like so much pointless sniping goes on that it's impossible to work through anything mostly because we don't really know each other. we can't reveal personal details here, but we can get pretty close.
i'll start..
i'm a nerd. see my posts in the 'computers & internet' topics. i have a couple teenage sons 15 and 17. one lives with me, the other with my ex a couple miles away and it's a pretty good arrangement. i have a job (thank mammon!) at a little computer repair & sales shop in a medium sized city in the west. the pay isn't great but it's full time, so.. we're getting ready to move to a rustic cabin up the canyon where we'll have to heat with wood. thankfully there's a propane tank
i went through a breakup a couple months ago and it's been.. tumultuous. i've lashed out. probably on teh webz more than irl, but still i know it ain't right and i'm sorry to anyone i've offended. this one was different. she was sweet, before things went sour.
look we're all on the same page about our politics or we wouldn't still be here. even me the noob. we can't 'set aside' the issue of religion because the right won't let us. how is it possible for us to see each other as people enough to come together after all? to expand our sense of solidarity to include the too many splinter groups that form the progressive coalition?
just curious. and yeah the last few questions are probably rhetorical.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I love debate, role-playing games, writing stories, and consuming zombie media.
I'm married, but I left my wife some months back and got my own place. I love living by myself, but I had a long talk with her last night, and we may work things out.
I love all social programs, and wish they were expanded. I hate war, and I think the US gets involved in wars way more often than it should. I am glad the US went to war against Germany during WWII, because I believe The Holocaust was even worse than war. I don't care about gun laws, but I love gun debates.
I am a skeptic, but it is a little extreme. I believe all organizations (the US government, the NFL, etc.) and laws are strictly imaginary, just like unicorns, and this opinion is not always popular with other skeptics. I've been called a nihilist so many times that I stopped refuting the claim and started to embrace it.
LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)my distant ancestors include Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least one fairly fundie Protestant; and I have an ultra-Orthodox Israeli cousin; but most of my immediate relatives are atheists or agnostics.
I'm a British researcher and lecturer. Politically, I am first and foremost an opponent of the right-wing in all its forms. I was a Labour supporter until Blair; then preferred the LibDems for some years; then returned to supporting Labour, due to Clegg's collaboration with the Tories. I think that there is increasing collaboration between the right wings of different countries, and therefore it is important for the opponents of the Right to collaborate internationally too.
When it comes to religion, I believe in 'live and let live' and don't care too much what others do or don't believe. But the religious right are a menace. And that means the Right of all religions. Since most of the religious people whom I know personally are left-wing or apolitical, it took some time for me to realize how pervasive and disastrous the religious right is. But I became more and more aware of the long-term political mess in Belfast (much better now than it once was, but still not good); and the influence of the American Christian Right on the 2004 election; and the pernicious effect of religious-right parties on Israeli politics; and all the reasons why several friends of mine can't or won't go back to their theocratic Muslim countries of origin -and I came to realize how dangerous are gods made in the image of right-wingers and bigots. Then in 2010, I discovered that religious 'pro-life' nutters were getting far more influential locally than I had dreamt; and contributed to our election result in the constituency and our getting a Tory MP. Call me a 'NIMBY'; but that's when I got much more concerned about the dangers of the religious-right everywhere!
longship
(40,416 posts)I am not a host here, but I am a lifelong atheist and I do frequent DU Religion threads. I have made many friends here.
Yes, things can get contentious here. But there are many of us on all sides of the argument -- Let's not assume it's a dichotomy -- who like the discussion in spite of the possibilities of the multifactorial of positions that one could profess.
Of course, there are also those who like to throw chairs. I've done that in the past, on occasion here, but I have decided that I will no longer do that.
Welcome, friend. I am sure you will be a valuable contributor.
on edit: Damnit! It's late. That one sentence was a bitch!
defacto7
(14,162 posts)I'm sure you've been knocking around here at DU and know what it's about. It's a crazy ride sometimes and other times you can find really great people to exchange with. Sometimes you just grab a bag of popcorn and watch.
I'm an atheist myself for what it's worth. That's where I belong and to tell you the truth, it's become a little boring to discuss religion in general because the same arguments just repeat. Sometimes there are interesting personal insights that pop up which I have learned from. The science side of the forum comes up with some very nice news here and there which is more interesting to me.
Glad to have you around and enjoy yourself. Don't let the ragers get to you; they're worth a laugh though.
Cheers
sigmasix
(794 posts)I was a life-long, committed militant atheist; now I'm a faithful believer in Jesus Christ.
Didn't change my values one bit though.
Still believe in justice and fairness- that's why I started lurking and then became a registered member of DU.
Lot's of different beliefs here, some of them kinda ugly, some of them kinda funny- but most of the members hold a belief in justice and fairness.
At least that's supposed to be the point of a progressive board-- you'll see.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,161 posts)I was never that fervent (and was in a non-fervent sect - the Church of England). I grew more sceptical.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)And what does this have to do with atheists knowing as much about religious tradtions as believers.
FWIW, I think religion has become increasingly important as part of the overall US political dialogue. I have a great deal of interest in separation issues and how religious intersects with secular matters.
I also think that the religious right were organized in order to achieve political gains in ways that liberal/progressive people of faith have not done in a long time, and I have an interest in see the left reclaim that ground they have lost. I think we can best do that by building coaltions, including coalitions between believers and non-believers.
To those who only wish to continue the division or feel that this is a team sport in which one side must win and the other lose, I say, "Get out of my way". I have no time for that.
Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)You statement about non-believers know8ng more about religion that believers? I don't think that would hold up with any serious religionists.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)especially around here. Memorizing of scripture, maybe not, but knowledge about religions and religious acts, no doubt.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)He is serious, and we are not, so there.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)but it sounded like any serious religionist knows more about religion than people who aren't as serious about it. A lot of people WERE serious religionists, know serious ones, have studied and/or watched the events and now don't believe because of what they have read/witnessed. It doesn't take away anything from them.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I mean, when one is serious about religion, they can't be wrong. Right, charles?
pinto
(106,886 posts)So there.
And I'm a jerk to play into your tit for tat by responding. Apologize for that. I'm better than that and so are you. You make some good points in discussions.
Take this knee jerk response for what it is.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But what can I say? Hypocrisy, especially when it comes from those that think they are better than everyone else, pushes my buttons.
I'll not let a hypocrite, especially those of epic proportions, slide so easily. YMMV.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)But your anecdotal evidence may vary.
LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)than believers:
http://www.pewforum.org/u-s-religious-knowledge-survey-who-knows-what-about-religion.aspx
As has been pointed out, may reflect the fact that many American atheists are former believers who explored their faith deeply and chose to reject it. The same might not be found with regard to people who live in atheist communities and have never been much exposed to faith.
bananas
(27,509 posts)21% of atheists and 55% of agnostics believe in god
8% of atheists and 17% of agnostics are absolutely certain god exists:
<snip>
They Dont Make Atheists Like They Used To
By CHRIS SUELLENTROP
If only George Carlin were around to ponder this oxymoron: Steven Waldman, the editor-in-chief of Beliefnet, digs into the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (and reported on by The Times yesterday), and finds an interesting nugget: 21 percent of atheists believe in god.
What this means is that Atheism has become a cultural designation, rather than a theological statement, Waldman writes on his Beliefnet blog. Some are likely declaring themselves atheists as a statement of hostility to organized religion, rather than to God. This might help explain polls showing rising numbers of Atheists.
(On the flip side, Waldman also notes that about a quarter of those who say religion is very important in their lives dont attend religious services.)
21% of atheists believe in God
by chunkdz

And a whopping 73% of atheists do not believe in God.
How long have I been telling you these are not rational people we are dealing with?
LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)According to recent surveys, about 60% of people in England and Wales claim to be Christians; about 8% members of other religions; and about 32% no religion or not stated.
In other recent surveys, about one-third claim to believe in God, one-third in some sort of spirit or life-force, and one-third in no God or spirit.
6 to 10 per cent attend a weekly religious service.
A lot depends on how the questions are asked. Though religion is undoubtedly declining over here, there has always been a significant number of people who are vaguely agnostic, mostly nominal members of the Church of England, and who might get classed as believers or unbelievers depending on the exact question.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Are believers the same as a religionist??
muriel_volestrangler
(106,161 posts)With quotes all the way from 1651 ("But his anger burns against you; O you false Religionists!"
okasha
(11,573 posts)who was PPR'd for hacking into another member's account, inserting TOS-violation material in one of the member's posts, and alerting on that member in an effort to get him banned.
Most of us don't miss him.
struggle4progress
(126,116 posts)its own hosts after DU3 opened officially:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218129
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12181110
okasha
(11,573 posts)I was out of touch for a bit and missed that.
struggle4progress
(126,116 posts)in a group or forum. The demo hosts were all removed as hosts when DU3 officially launched
The DU3 demo runs were a rough time for some of us: I actually got banned from Cooking and Baking as a disruptor
okasha
(11,573 posts)Don't tell me you prefer buttercream to cooked icing? Or pan-sauteing to grilling? How dreadful of you.
struggle4progress
(126,116 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)struggle4progress
(126,116 posts)What was I thinking? Let me go on record, right here and now, as a firm opponent of cornflake chicken -- a nasty barbaric idea that no right-thinking person would even consider!
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Take my word for it - it does not work!
muriel_volestrangler
(106,161 posts)The other member (rug, wasn't it?) linked to an online image he had put up. Since it was his image, he altered his own links to it, and then changed it to something embarrassing (pro right wing, I seem to remember) so that then showed up in rug's posts. Childish, and then alerting on rug was definitely over the line; but he didn't hack into anything.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I missed the incident in question, coming in only on the discussion afterwards. The above is what seemed to have happened, given the comments of laconicsax's defenders.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)He purposefully changed the image to something so gruesome and appalling that it shocked even me, which is hard to do.
He didn't hack anything, but he definitely used nefarious tactics to try and set rug up. It was an ugly episode for which he deserved banning.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,161 posts)I don't think I ever saw the gruesome photo. But before that one, he changed the first image to a pro-Romney one, and alerted on it, though the jury didn't hide:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1240116557#post148
The banning message says he did the alert on the gruesome photo too:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=118400&sub=trans
But it is worth pointing out the DU account wasn't hacked, just to reassure people that DU isn't some easily hacked system that any old member can subvert when they get pissed off.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)The first one wasn't bad enough, so he upped the ante.
To be honest, I was surprised that he was sloppy enough to not remove the evidence that he was the one that had alerted on it.
It was just an ugly episode all the way around.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)should not have linked a photo from someone else's photobucket account without permission. Laconicsax was wrong in what he did but I think he was fed up with some of the antics of the other person, if I am not mistaken.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)He was a host of Atheists & Agnostics and not Religion.
He DIDN'T hack into another member's account (that member hot linked to an imaged in the former hosts photobucket account)
He DIDN'T insert TOS-Violation material into a member's post (he changed the picture in HIS OWN PHOTOBUCKET account that the member here hot linked to)
He DIDN'T alert in an effort to get him banned (he alerted just to be a jerk and play around with that member--I'm not defending the alerting action and the former member has expressed regret for the alerting portion)
But don't let facts get in the way of what you are telling people.
Plenty of us do miss him.
okasha
(11,573 posts)However, I think you're being extremely disengenuous in asking us to believe that he didn't intend to get rug banned.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)He told me he didn't. He did want to get him locked out of that thread and he did want to teach him a lesson that hot linking to someones photobucket account is both not cool and really, really dangerous. If he wanted to get him banned, he would have changed the picture to some porn (which, btw, is likely to happen to you if you hot link to someone's photobucket account out in the real world of the intertubes).
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Especially considering your recent behavior, which is much worse than what laconicsax did. At least laconicsax admitted what s/he did and tried to make amends.
What have you done to atone for your blatant personal attack and smear of another DU member? Nothing. Nothing at all.
Until you address YOUR problematic behavior, what credibility can you expect to have when judging others?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)She has absolutely zilch in that department. To not even offer a half-hearted apology is just inexcusable. What she did is worse than anything laconicsax did.
struggle4progress
(126,116 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)that he was the temp host when they were testing this all out.
Thanks for the reminder.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)wouldn't you think that a simple apology for lying and devious behavior might have helped?
mr blur
(7,753 posts)And some of us do miss her.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)people really opening up about themselves! i'm only halfway done reading, though so back to it..