Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Phillip McCleod

(1,837 posts)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 01:45 AM Mar 2013

may i ask as a curious noob.. any past nonbelieving hosts of DU religion?

i honestly don't know and just wondered. studies have shown that atheists etc know at least as much if not much more about religious traditions as their believing fellow human beings.

ps.. this is my 1st thread attempt in 'religion' so plz take it easy. let's be curious people with each other for once is how it seems around here. myself included.

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
may i ask as a curious noob.. any past nonbelieving hosts of DU religion? (Original Post) Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 OP
"any past nonbelieving hosts of DU religion?" ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #1
that was what i was asking. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #2
I'm a college student. ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #27
I'm a second-generation British atheist, with a fairly international background.. LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #30
No worries, Phillip. longship Mar 2013 #3
Welcome to the stew, Phillip! defacto7 Mar 2013 #4
I'm an former atheist sigmasix Mar 2013 #5
Cool story bro 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2013 #6
I'm a host - I did believe when I was young, though drifted out of it as a teenager muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #7
Are you just interested in hosts? Nonbelievers? cbayer Mar 2013 #8
Hang in there Thats my opinion Mar 2013 #9
I think it would, EvilAL Mar 2013 #10
That is merely yet ANOTHER believer who claims everyone but him has it wrong. cleanhippie Mar 2013 #12
I'm not sure what he meant EvilAL Mar 2013 #13
"serious religionists"? Like yourself, perhaps? I thought you were a "serious theologian"? cleanhippie Mar 2013 #11
I think you're a serious jerk. Personalizing so many discussions can't be wrong. Right? pinto Mar 2013 #15
Meh. I consider it part of the job. cleanhippie Mar 2013 #31
Studies done show it. Goblinmonger Mar 2013 #22
There was a Pew Forum study that suggested that American atheists do often know more about religion LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #28
Pew also found that 21% of atheists believe in god and 8% are "absolutely certain" god exists bananas Mar 2013 #45
In the UK there seem to be plenty of Christians who don't believe in God! LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #46
What the heck is a religionist?? Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #36
Oxford English Dictionary: muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #41
We did have a past nonbelieving host okasha Mar 2013 #14
He was only appointed host for a demo run. Members of this forum discussed hosting and chose struggle4progress Mar 2013 #16
Thanks. okasha Mar 2013 #17
DU3 had several short-lived demo runs where anybody could ask Skinner for host duties struggle4progress Mar 2013 #19
What?! okasha Mar 2013 #21
I don't remember exactly: I might have flown into a rage about raspberry spam struggle4progress Mar 2013 #23
Lol! It was the cornflake chicken recipe you posted. cbayer Mar 2013 #32
Holy moly! Are you sure? I can't believe I posted a cornflake chicken recipe! struggle4progress Mar 2013 #37
True story - I recently tried to make fried chicken with Special K. cbayer Mar 2013 #38
He didn't hack into anything, let alone a member's account muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #18
Thanks for clarifying. okasha Mar 2013 #20
That's not exactly the right story either. cbayer Mar 2013 #33
Looking back, he did both muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #34
That is the correct history as I recall it. cbayer Mar 2013 #35
And the person... rexcat Mar 2013 #39
So much wrong in one little post. Goblinmonger Mar 2013 #24
Thanks for the correction on the technical aspects. okasha Mar 2013 #25
I know he didn't Goblinmonger Mar 2013 #43
I think you're being extremely disengenuous in asking us to believe that you actually care. cleanhippie Mar 2013 #44
"what credibility can you expect to have when judging others?" trotsky Mar 2013 #47
Skinner temporarily appointed him host here in Religion during one of the DU3 demos: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #26
Kinda forgot Goblinmonger Mar 2013 #42
Perhaps if he would have simply apologized for the unethical behavior... cleanhippie Mar 2013 #29
You are wrong, as ever. mr blur Mar 2013 #40
wow i'm kinda blown away by the amazing responses here.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #48

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
1. "any past nonbelieving hosts of DU religion?"
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 01:54 AM
Mar 2013

I am not sure what you are asking here. I was a nonbelieving Religion host in the past, and I am currently a nonbelieving Religion host.

 

Phillip McCleod

(1,837 posts)
2. that was what i was asking.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 02:13 AM
Mar 2013

and i'm just plain glad to hear it.

now that that's out of the way what do you say to a re-introduction session. we all interact almost every day and i don't know the first thing about any of you. i feel like so much pointless sniping goes on that it's impossible to work through anything mostly because we don't really know each other. we can't reveal personal details here, but we can get pretty close.

i'll start..

i'm a nerd. see my posts in the 'computers & internet' topics. i have a couple teenage sons 15 and 17. one lives with me, the other with my ex a couple miles away and it's a pretty good arrangement. i have a job (thank mammon!) at a little computer repair & sales shop in a medium sized city in the west. the pay isn't great but it's full time, so.. we're getting ready to move to a rustic cabin up the canyon where we'll have to heat with wood. thankfully there's a propane tank

i went through a breakup a couple months ago and it's been.. tumultuous. i've lashed out. probably on teh webz more than irl, but still i know it ain't right and i'm sorry to anyone i've offended. this one was different. she was sweet, before things went sour.

look we're all on the same page about our politics or we wouldn't still be here. even me the noob. we can't 'set aside' the issue of religion because the right won't let us. how is it possible for us to see each other as people enough to come together after all? to expand our sense of solidarity to include the too many splinter groups that form the progressive coalition?

just curious. and yeah the last few questions are probably rhetorical.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
27. I'm a college student.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 06:37 PM
Mar 2013

I love debate, role-playing games, writing stories, and consuming zombie media.

I'm married, but I left my wife some months back and got my own place. I love living by myself, but I had a long talk with her last night, and we may work things out.

I love all social programs, and wish they were expanded. I hate war, and I think the US gets involved in wars way more often than it should. I am glad the US went to war against Germany during WWII, because I believe The Holocaust was even worse than war. I don't care about gun laws, but I love gun debates.

I am a skeptic, but it is a little extreme. I believe all organizations (the US government, the NFL, etc.) and laws are strictly imaginary, just like unicorns, and this opinion is not always popular with other skeptics. I've been called a nihilist so many times that I stopped refuting the claim and started to embrace it.

LeftishBrit

(41,453 posts)
30. I'm a second-generation British atheist, with a fairly international background..
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 07:05 PM
Mar 2013

my distant ancestors include Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least one fairly fundie Protestant; and I have an ultra-Orthodox Israeli cousin; but most of my immediate relatives are atheists or agnostics.

I'm a British researcher and lecturer. Politically, I am first and foremost an opponent of the right-wing in all its forms. I was a Labour supporter until Blair; then preferred the LibDems for some years; then returned to supporting Labour, due to Clegg's collaboration with the Tories. I think that there is increasing collaboration between the right wings of different countries, and therefore it is important for the opponents of the Right to collaborate internationally too.

When it comes to religion, I believe in 'live and let live' and don't care too much what others do or don't believe. But the religious right are a menace. And that means the Right of all religions. Since most of the religious people whom I know personally are left-wing or apolitical, it took some time for me to realize how pervasive and disastrous the religious right is. But I became more and more aware of the long-term political mess in Belfast (much better now than it once was, but still not good); and the influence of the American Christian Right on the 2004 election; and the pernicious effect of religious-right parties on Israeli politics; and all the reasons why several friends of mine can't or won't go back to their theocratic Muslim countries of origin -and I came to realize how dangerous are gods made in the image of right-wingers and bigots. Then in 2010, I discovered that religious 'pro-life' nutters were getting far more influential locally than I had dreamt; and contributed to our election result in the constituency and our getting a Tory MP. Call me a 'NIMBY'; but that's when I got much more concerned about the dangers of the religious-right everywhere!

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. No worries, Phillip.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 02:43 AM
Mar 2013

I am not a host here, but I am a lifelong atheist and I do frequent DU Religion threads. I have made many friends here.

Yes, things can get contentious here. But there are many of us on all sides of the argument -- Let's not assume it's a dichotomy -- who like the discussion in spite of the possibilities of the multifactorial of positions that one could profess.


Of course, there are also those who like to throw chairs. I've done that in the past, on occasion here, but I have decided that I will no longer do that.

Welcome, friend. I am sure you will be a valuable contributor.


on edit: Damnit! It's late. That one sentence was a bitch!

defacto7

(14,162 posts)
4. Welcome to the stew, Phillip!
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:26 AM
Mar 2013

I'm sure you've been knocking around here at DU and know what it's about. It's a crazy ride sometimes and other times you can find really great people to exchange with. Sometimes you just grab a bag of popcorn and watch.

I'm an atheist myself for what it's worth. That's where I belong and to tell you the truth, it's become a little boring to discuss religion in general because the same arguments just repeat. Sometimes there are interesting personal insights that pop up which I have learned from. The science side of the forum comes up with some very nice news here and there which is more interesting to me.

Glad to have you around and enjoy yourself. Don't let the ragers get to you; they're worth a laugh though.

Cheers

sigmasix

(794 posts)
5. I'm an former atheist
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:07 AM
Mar 2013

I was a life-long, committed militant atheist; now I'm a faithful believer in Jesus Christ.
Didn't change my values one bit though.
Still believe in justice and fairness- that's why I started lurking and then became a registered member of DU.
Lot's of different beliefs here, some of them kinda ugly, some of them kinda funny- but most of the members hold a belief in justice and fairness.
At least that's supposed to be the point of a progressive board-- you'll see.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,161 posts)
7. I'm a host - I did believe when I was young, though drifted out of it as a teenager
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 11:23 AM
Mar 2013

I was never that fervent (and was in a non-fervent sect - the Church of England). I grew more sceptical.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
8. Are you just interested in hosts? Nonbelievers?
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:44 PM
Mar 2013

And what does this have to do with atheists knowing as much about religious tradtions as believers.

FWIW, I think religion has become increasingly important as part of the overall US political dialogue. I have a great deal of interest in separation issues and how religious intersects with secular matters.

I also think that the religious right were organized in order to achieve political gains in ways that liberal/progressive people of faith have not done in a long time, and I have an interest in see the left reclaim that ground they have lost. I think we can best do that by building coaltions, including coalitions between believers and non-believers.

To those who only wish to continue the division or feel that this is a team sport in which one side must win and the other lose, I say, "Get out of my way". I have no time for that.

Thats my opinion

(2,001 posts)
9. Hang in there
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:51 PM
Mar 2013

You statement about non-believers know8ng more about religion that believers? I don't think that would hold up with any serious religionists.

EvilAL

(1,437 posts)
10. I think it would,
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:36 PM
Mar 2013

especially around here. Memorizing of scripture, maybe not, but knowledge about religions and religious acts, no doubt.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
12. That is merely yet ANOTHER believer who claims everyone but him has it wrong.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:42 PM
Mar 2013

He is serious, and we are not, so there.

EvilAL

(1,437 posts)
13. I'm not sure what he meant
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:48 PM
Mar 2013

but it sounded like any serious religionist knows more about religion than people who aren't as serious about it. A lot of people WERE serious religionists, know serious ones, have studied and/or watched the events and now don't believe because of what they have read/witnessed. It doesn't take away anything from them.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
11. "serious religionists"? Like yourself, perhaps? I thought you were a "serious theologian"?
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:41 PM
Mar 2013


I mean, when one is serious about religion, they can't be wrong. Right, charles?

pinto

(106,886 posts)
15. I think you're a serious jerk. Personalizing so many discussions can't be wrong. Right?
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:03 PM
Mar 2013

So there.

And I'm a jerk to play into your tit for tat by responding. Apologize for that. I'm better than that and so are you. You make some good points in discussions.

Take this knee jerk response for what it is.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
31. Meh. I consider it part of the job.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 07:08 PM
Mar 2013


But what can I say? Hypocrisy, especially when it comes from those that think they are better than everyone else, pushes my buttons.

I'll not let a hypocrite, especially those of epic proportions, slide so easily. YMMV.

LeftishBrit

(41,453 posts)
28. There was a Pew Forum study that suggested that American atheists do often know more about religion
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 06:49 PM
Mar 2013

than believers:

http://www.pewforum.org/u-s-religious-knowledge-survey-who-knows-what-about-religion.aspx

As has been pointed out, may reflect the fact that many American atheists are former believers who explored their faith deeply and chose to reject it. The same might not be found with regard to people who live in atheist communities and have never been much exposed to faith.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
45. Pew also found that 21% of atheists believe in god and 8% are "absolutely certain" god exists
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 02:12 PM
Mar 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=214x176738

21% of atheists and 55% of agnostics believe in god

8% of atheists and 17% of agnostics are absolutely certain god exists:

<snip>


http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/they-dont-make-atheists-like-they-used-to/

They Don’t Make Atheists Like They Used To
By CHRIS SUELLENTROP

If only George Carlin were around to ponder this oxymoron: Steven Waldman, the editor-in-chief of Beliefnet, digs into the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (and reported on by The Times yesterday), and finds an interesting nugget: “21 percent of atheists believe in god.”

“What this means is that Atheism has become a cultural designation, rather than a theological statement,” Waldman writes on his Beliefnet blog. “Some are likely declaring themselves atheists as a statement of hostility to organized religion, rather than to God. This might help explain polls showing rising numbers of Atheists.”

(On the flip side, Waldman also notes that “about a quarter” of those who say religion is “very important in their lives” don’t attend religious services.)


http://telicthoughts.com/21-of-atheists-believe-in-god/

21% of atheists believe in God
by chunkdz



And a whopping 73% of atheists do not believe in God.

How long have I been telling you these are not rational people we are dealing with?

LeftishBrit

(41,453 posts)
46. In the UK there seem to be plenty of Christians who don't believe in God!
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 02:52 PM
Mar 2013

According to recent surveys, about 60% of people in England and Wales claim to be Christians; about 8% members of other religions; and about 32% no religion or not stated.

In other recent surveys, about one-third claim to believe in God, one-third in some sort of spirit or life-force, and one-third in no God or spirit.

6 to 10 per cent attend a weekly religious service.

A lot depends on how the questions are asked. Though religion is undoubtedly declining over here, there has always been a significant number of people who are vaguely agnostic, mostly nominal members of the Church of England, and who might get classed as believers or unbelievers depending on the exact question.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,161 posts)
41. Oxford English Dictionary:
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 09:46 AM
Mar 2013
A person devoted to religion; an excessively religious person, a zealot. Also: a person professionally occupied with religion, as a minister or preacher.


With quotes all the way from 1651 ("But his anger burns against you; O you false Religionists!&quot , through 1693 ("As for the moderate, rational and intelligent religionists, they are so few&quot up to Terry Pratchett in 1999 ("Evolution..caused so much trouble from religionists because it takes the gloss off one of their favourite arguments, the argument from design&quot .

okasha

(11,573 posts)
14. We did have a past nonbelieving host
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:52 PM
Mar 2013

who was PPR'd for hacking into another member's account, inserting TOS-violation material in one of the member's posts, and alerting on that member in an effort to get him banned.

Most of us don't miss him.

struggle4progress

(126,116 posts)
19. DU3 had several short-lived demo runs where anybody could ask Skinner for host duties
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:32 PM
Mar 2013

in a group or forum. The demo hosts were all removed as hosts when DU3 officially launched

The DU3 demo runs were a rough time for some of us: I actually got banned from Cooking and Baking as a disruptor

okasha

(11,573 posts)
21. What?!
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:35 PM
Mar 2013

Don't tell me you prefer buttercream to cooked icing? Or pan-sauteing to grilling? How dreadful of you.

struggle4progress

(126,116 posts)
37. Holy moly! Are you sure? I can't believe I posted a cornflake chicken recipe!
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 11:27 PM
Mar 2013

What was I thinking? Let me go on record, right here and now, as a firm opponent of cornflake chicken -- a nasty barbaric idea that no right-thinking person would even consider!

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
38. True story - I recently tried to make fried chicken with Special K.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 11:36 PM
Mar 2013

Take my word for it - it does not work!

muriel_volestrangler

(106,161 posts)
18. He didn't hack into anything, let alone a member's account
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:28 PM
Mar 2013

The other member (rug, wasn't it?) linked to an online image he had put up. Since it was his image, he altered his own links to it, and then changed it to something embarrassing (pro right wing, I seem to remember) so that then showed up in rug's posts. Childish, and then alerting on rug was definitely over the line; but he didn't hack into anything.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
20. Thanks for clarifying.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:32 PM
Mar 2013

I missed the incident in question, coming in only on the discussion afterwards. The above is what seemed to have happened, given the comments of laconicsax's defenders.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
33. That's not exactly the right story either.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 08:49 PM
Mar 2013

He purposefully changed the image to something so gruesome and appalling that it shocked even me, which is hard to do.

He didn't hack anything, but he definitely used nefarious tactics to try and set rug up. It was an ugly episode for which he deserved banning.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,161 posts)
34. Looking back, he did both
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 09:39 PM
Mar 2013

I don't think I ever saw the gruesome photo. But before that one, he changed the first image to a pro-Romney one, and alerted on it, though the jury didn't hide:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1240116557#post148

The banning message says he did the alert on the gruesome photo too:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=118400&sub=trans

But it is worth pointing out the DU account wasn't hacked, just to reassure people that DU isn't some easily hacked system that any old member can subvert when they get pissed off.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
35. That is the correct history as I recall it.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 09:42 PM
Mar 2013

The first one wasn't bad enough, so he upped the ante.

To be honest, I was surprised that he was sloppy enough to not remove the evidence that he was the one that had alerted on it.

It was just an ugly episode all the way around.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
39. And the person...
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 11:47 PM
Mar 2013

should not have linked a photo from someone else's photobucket account without permission. Laconicsax was wrong in what he did but I think he was fed up with some of the antics of the other person, if I am not mistaken.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
24. So much wrong in one little post.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:40 PM
Mar 2013

He was a host of Atheists & Agnostics and not Religion.
He DIDN'T hack into another member's account (that member hot linked to an imaged in the former hosts photobucket account)
He DIDN'T insert TOS-Violation material into a member's post (he changed the picture in HIS OWN PHOTOBUCKET account that the member here hot linked to)
He DIDN'T alert in an effort to get him banned (he alerted just to be a jerk and play around with that member--I'm not defending the alerting action and the former member has expressed regret for the alerting portion)

But don't let facts get in the way of what you are telling people.

Plenty of us do miss him.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
25. Thanks for the correction on the technical aspects.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:58 PM
Mar 2013

However, I think you're being extremely disengenuous in asking us to believe that he didn't intend to get rug banned.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
43. I know he didn't
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 01:18 PM
Mar 2013

He told me he didn't. He did want to get him locked out of that thread and he did want to teach him a lesson that hot linking to someones photobucket account is both not cool and really, really dangerous. If he wanted to get him banned, he would have changed the picture to some porn (which, btw, is likely to happen to you if you hot link to someone's photobucket account out in the real world of the intertubes).

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
44. I think you're being extremely disengenuous in asking us to believe that you actually care.
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 01:25 PM
Mar 2013

Especially considering your recent behavior, which is much worse than what laconicsax did. At least laconicsax admitted what s/he did and tried to make amends.

What have you done to atone for your blatant personal attack and smear of another DU member? Nothing. Nothing at all.

Until you address YOUR problematic behavior, what credibility can you expect to have when judging others?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
47. "what credibility can you expect to have when judging others?"
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 09:34 PM
Mar 2013

She has absolutely zilch in that department. To not even offer a half-hearted apology is just inexcusable. What she did is worse than anything laconicsax did.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
42. Kinda forgot
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 01:16 PM
Mar 2013

that he was the temp host when they were testing this all out.

Thanks for the reminder.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
29. Perhaps if he would have simply apologized for the unethical behavior...
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 07:05 PM
Mar 2013

wouldn't you think that a simple apology for lying and devious behavior might have helped?


 

Phillip McCleod

(1,837 posts)
48. wow i'm kinda blown away by the amazing responses here..
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 07:06 AM
Mar 2013

people really opening up about themselves! i'm only halfway done reading, though so back to it..

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»may i ask as a curious no...