HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Religion & Spirituality » Religion (Group) » Fabio Martinez Castilla: ...

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:32 AM

Fabio Martinez Castilla: Abortion is Worse Than Child Rape, Says Mexican Archbishop

Last edited Mon May 6, 2013, 11:22 AM - Edit history (1)

Fabio Martínez Castilla, Archbishop of Tuxla Gutiérrez sparked some controversy over remarks made on Tuesday at a homily in the Metropolitan Cathedral of San Marcos, by claiming that “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

(Let's see that again for the obtuse among us:

“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”


Appointed Archbishop last May by then Pope Benedict XVI, Castilla went on to clarify that both abuse and abortion “quantitatively do much harm and deserve punishment.” He is a firm believer in the Church’s stance on contraceptives and condoms as “patches” to avoid responsibility.

--snip--

Pope Benedict XVI himself sparked controversy in Latin America when, in a 2007 trip to Brazil, he insinuated that politicians who had advocated for abortion rights ought to be excommunicated from the church. “Yes, the excommunication isn’t something arbitrary — it’s part of the code,” the pope remarked.

With regard to abuse cases, though the former pope was the first to openly apologize to victims of sexual assault by priests, his message was often mixed: “In the Church, priests are also sinners. But I am personally convinced that the constant presence in the press of the sins of Catholic priests, especially in the United States, is a planned campaign, as the percentage of these offenses among priests is not higher than in other categories, and is perhaps even lower…”

http://www.policymic.com/articles/39225/fabio-martinez-castilla-abortion-is-worse-than-child-rape-says-mexican-archbishop



“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”


I've said it once if not a hundred times: It's not the pope or the bishops that are the problem now, it's the laity. It's those that continue to support this terrible institution with their time, money, and support.

119 replies, 11475 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 119 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fabio Martinez Castilla: Abortion is Worse Than Child Rape, Says Mexican Archbishop (Original post)
cleanhippie May 2013 OP
stopbush May 2013 #1
Name removed May 2013 #79
Walk away May 2013 #2
DetlefK May 2013 #3
cleanhippie May 2013 #4
backscatter712 May 2013 #5
Name removed May 2013 #81
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #93
DetlefK May 2013 #7
cleanhippie May 2013 #8
Lordquinton May 2013 #24
Goblinmonger May 2013 #6
Dawson Leery May 2013 #9
Name removed May 2013 #80
Lordquinton May 2013 #83
Name removed May 2013 #84
Lordquinton May 2013 #85
Name removed May 2013 #86
Lordquinton May 2013 #88
Name removed May 2013 #90
Lordquinton May 2013 #91
Name removed May 2013 #92
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #95
Name removed May 2013 #97
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #99
Name removed May 2013 #107
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #108
Name removed May 2013 #110
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #111
trotsky May 2013 #114
hrmjustin May 2013 #115
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #117
hrmjustin May 2013 #118
Meshuga May 2013 #116
hrmjustin May 2013 #109
Lordquinton May 2013 #96
Name removed May 2013 #98
Meshuga May 2013 #100
hrmjustin May 2013 #104
Name removed May 2013 #112
hrmjustin May 2013 #102
Name removed May 2013 #103
hrmjustin May 2013 #106
rug May 2013 #10
cleanhippie May 2013 #11
rug May 2013 #12
cleanhippie May 2013 #13
rug May 2013 #14
cleanhippie May 2013 #15
rug May 2013 #16
cleanhippie May 2013 #27
rug May 2013 #28
cleanhippie May 2013 #31
rug May 2013 #32
cleanhippie May 2013 #39
rug May 2013 #42
cleanhippie May 2013 #48
Lordquinton May 2013 #33
rug May 2013 #34
Lordquinton May 2013 #35
rug May 2013 #36
Lordquinton May 2013 #37
rug May 2013 #38
Lordquinton May 2013 #51
cleanhippie May 2013 #54
Lordquinton May 2013 #65
cleanhippie May 2013 #69
Lordquinton May 2013 #73
cleanhippie May 2013 #76
Lordquinton May 2013 #82
Name removed May 2013 #87
Lordquinton May 2013 #89
rug May 2013 #113
Lordquinton May 2013 #119
Lordquinton May 2013 #17
rug May 2013 #19
Lordquinton May 2013 #22
rug May 2013 #23
Lordquinton May 2013 #25
rug May 2013 #26
Lordquinton May 2013 #30
skepticscott May 2013 #41
rug May 2013 #43
skepticscott May 2013 #46
rug May 2013 #47
cleanhippie May 2013 #56
rug May 2013 #57
cleanhippie May 2013 #59
rug May 2013 #60
cleanhippie May 2013 #61
rug May 2013 #62
cleanhippie May 2013 #64
rug May 2013 #66
cleanhippie May 2013 #67
rug May 2013 #68
cleanhippie May 2013 #70
rug May 2013 #71
cleanhippie May 2013 #72
rug May 2013 #74
cleanhippie May 2013 #75
rug May 2013 #77
cleanhippie May 2013 #78
rug May 2013 #44
Lordquinton May 2013 #53
cleanhippie May 2013 #29
rug May 2013 #45
cleanhippie May 2013 #49
rug May 2013 #55
cleanhippie May 2013 #58
edhopper May 2013 #18
rug May 2013 #20
edhopper May 2013 #21
cleanhippie May 2013 #50
Name removed May 2013 #94
Phillip McCleod May 2013 #101
dimbear May 2013 #40
allan01 May 2013 #52
HooptieWagon May 2013 #63
DesertFlower May 2013 #105

Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:39 AM

1. Er, because priests don't perform abortions but they do rape children?

In a related story, wife beating is worse than child rape, because priests don't have wives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stopbush (Reply #1)


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:51 AM

2. Is abortion OK if you are a child who was raped by a Catholic Priest???

Or is that just even more serious????

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:52 AM

3. It doesn't matter, that the percentage of perpetrators isn't unusually high.

The concept of a "priest" is defined by superiority: superior understanding of the divine, superior morals.
One bad apple, and the whole argument goes out of the window.

Why should I give preference to the opinion of a guy who is just as fallible as me?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DetlefK (Reply #3)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:57 AM

4. It's not the pope or the bishops that are the problem now, it's the laity.

It's those that continue to support this terrible institution with their time, money, and support.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #4)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:05 AM

5. Exactly.

People who continue to tithe to the Roman Catholic Church are acting as enablers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backscatter712 (Reply #5)


Response to Name removed (Reply #81)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:34 PM

93. perhaps that's not the intent of the laity..

 

..but that's the practical result.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #4)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:18 AM

7. That's actually an interesting problem, philosophically.

If you follow the rules of Christianity too close, you end up, attempting to govern an economically and scientifically advanced society with Bronze-Age laws and morals. And then you hate gays for reasons that empirically don't make sense.

If you follow the rules of Christianity not close enough, you disregard it's laws for setting up a stable society. And start raping children.

Doomed if you do.
Doomed if you don't.

So, if only "religion light" offers a viable middle-ground, why religion at all?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DetlefK (Reply #7)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:21 AM

8. "...why religion at all?" Exactly. It is an outdated and obsolete framework for a lesser developed

society.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DetlefK (Reply #7)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:44 PM

24. Woah, back up

"If you follow the rules of Christianity not close enough, you disregard it's laws for setting up a stable society. And start raping children. "

Child Rape is not a product of not following Christianity, in fact, most major religions through out history practice pederasty or other forms, it's only in more modern times that we have decided that it might be a bad idea.

Following the rules closely leads you to stoning people for eating shrimp, and selling daughters into slavery, far cry from just "attempting to govern an economically and scientifically advanced society with Bronze-Age laws and morals." There are few rules in the bible and other holy books which allow for more than a basic tribal society, which is what the US is being reduced to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:13 AM

6. Cue "but Dawkins said" comments

 

in 5, 4, 3....

[FONT COLOR="FFFFFF"]Of course said to make it sound like Dawkins made the claim and not the girl that was actually raped.[/FONT]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 12:58 PM

9. This is why people are leaving your filthy church.

"Pro-life" = pro zygote.
Once birth occurs, the cult of "pro-life" becomes the death cult of war, low wages, poverty, dirty air/water etc.

This is why people are leaving your piece of s**t church, along with the evangelicals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawson Leery (Reply #9)


Response to Name removed (Reply #80)

Tue May 7, 2013, 07:35 PM

83. The numbers are out there, easy to find

visit planned parenthood. Unless you have info that shows most aren't.

Do you agree with him? maybe you should denounce him as not sharing your views, unless you agree that abortion is worse than rape and people who do it/have it done deserve worse punishments than child raping priests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #83)


Response to Name removed (Reply #84)

Tue May 7, 2013, 08:16 PM

85. I have nothing to apolagize for

And you, nor any other RCC member, or any religious person at all really, has come out to say anything anything to suggest that this priest said something that was his personal belief, rather than something church members agree with him on.

Zygote, embryo, let's split hairs more shall we?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #85)


Response to Name removed (Reply #86)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:00 PM

88. "Frankly, I haven't thoroughly studied the first post "

Clearly, as I didn't any of the things you claim I have said, twice now, when are you going to apolagise for that?

I have asked only one question, and folks, like yourself, have twisted and flailed to get out of answering it: Do you agree or disagree with the statement: “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.” ?

That is the only thing I have asked in this thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #88)


Response to Name removed (Reply #90)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:15 PM

91. This is the complex question

Do you agree “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

That is a very simple question that can, in fact be answered with a yes and/or no. I would not report anyone for answering it, just as I hope none would report me for asking it. This isn't some clever gotcha question, this is a very serious, and important question, and none here have come out and said one way or another.

Break the mold, be the first to commit yourself to your belief!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #91)


Response to Name removed (Reply #92)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:45 PM

95. except that *not* all catholics agree with the hierarchy on this..

 

..you, however, seem to agree.

tell us straight, please, are you pro-choice or anti-choice?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phillip McCleod (Reply #95)


Response to Name removed (Reply #97)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:53 PM

99. fuck the bishop. i'm asking *you*. \n

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phillip McCleod (Reply #99)


Response to Name removed (Reply #107)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:19 PM

108. how would i know? did you see my post count? \n

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phillip McCleod (Reply #108)


Response to Name removed (Reply #110)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:29 PM

111. in other words, you're a pro-lifer. just say it.

 

don't be a coward. or maybe that's just the way it works when you're peddling apologetics for the RCC.

we're done here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to trotsky (Reply #114)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:45 PM

115. It will be taken care of.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trotsky (Reply #114)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:47 PM

117. hm. can't say i'd ever been in that group until now. seems like..

 

..there's much to *learn*.

i will, of course, respect the group's autonomy. it's easy to be a good neighbor when one is a hermit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trotsky (Reply #114)

Tue May 7, 2013, 11:12 PM

118. He is gone!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #110)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:47 PM

116. Chances are that it won't work out

Your ideology is not compatible and what happened to you earlier today will inevitably repeat itself. So why waste your time? And why not respect the decision of the site admins who made an explicit decision earlier today? You seem worried with the rules so why not respect this one simple decision?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #107)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:25 PM

109. You take your chances.

 

Someone the other day came in and posted really conservative stuff and was banned when he crossed the line. This is a liberal political board and if you are going to post stuff from a conservative view point you should expect that you will be heavily challenged.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #92)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:46 PM

96. So agreement?

I guess? No one will ever commit to it, that raping a child is not as bad as removing a group of cells.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #96)


Response to Name removed (Reply #98)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:58 PM

100. The bishop sees it the same way as...

...a member who was banned earlier today. Don't you agree?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #85)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:15 PM

104. He thinks you made this comment below.

 

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=78859

He does not realize he is talking to you and not the poster in the link above. I tried to correct him and we shall see how that works.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #85)


Response to Name removed (Reply #84)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:13 PM

102. The poster you are addressing did not make that comment.

 

This is the comment you are angry about.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=78859

You are addressing a different poster. That is why he is saying he has nothing to say sorry for. He did not say it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #102)


Response to Name removed (Reply #103)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:16 PM

106. Mistakes happen. just make a simple correction and than address the guy you wanted to.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 01:35 PM

10. From the link in your link:

 

Fabio Martínez Castilla, the Archbishop of Tuxtla Gutiérrez in Mexico’s southern state of Chiapas, said during a homily at the Metropolitan Cathedral of San Marcos that when children are sexually abused "their future is dying," but that it doesn’t compare with abortion because "it is murder."

"Qualitatively, abortion is much more serious than the rape of children by priests," Martínez Castilla said, adding though that "both quantitatively do much harm and deserve punishment."

Clarifying his comments, Martínez Castilla said that priests found molesting children should not be forgiven, but instead imprisoned and banned from the Church.


You wouldn't want to be seen as a cherrypicker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #10)

Mon May 6, 2013, 01:40 PM

11. “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #11)

Mon May 6, 2013, 01:42 PM

12. "priests found molesting children should not be forgiven, but instead imprisoned and banned"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #12)

Mon May 6, 2013, 01:45 PM

13. “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

take it up with your church leaders. They are the ones saying this. You don't want to be seen as an apologist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #13)

Mon May 6, 2013, 01:46 PM

14. I guess you do not in fact mind being seen as a cherry picker.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #14)

Mon May 6, 2013, 03:27 PM

15. I couldn't care less about your opinion on the subject, being a cherry picker yourself.

Or have you accepted everything in your bible and everything your church decrees over the weekend?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #15)

Mon May 6, 2013, 03:51 PM

16. As a matter of fact I don't but I do demand accuracy in news.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #16)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:48 PM

27. Maybe you should look for accuracy in your beliefs first.

YMMV.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #27)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:50 PM

28. It's much more challenging to find them in your posts.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #28)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:51 PM

31. You really CAN convince yourself to believe anything.

QED

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #31)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:59 PM

32. Simple dry clinical observation.

 

My conclusions are the captive of my observations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #32)


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #39)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:29 PM

42. Nice edits. I encourage all to read them.

 

A glimpse into the mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #42)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:21 PM

48. Merely a reflection of yourself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #12)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:12 PM

33. So, let's put this all together

“abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
"priests found molesting children should not be forgiven, but instead imprisoned and banned"

What punishment do the mothers deserve for comiting a crime that is worse than child rape?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #33)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:14 PM

34. That's an excellent question.

 

The answer is none.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #34)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:16 PM

35. But if it's a worse crime than child rape

than the punishment should be worse, no?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #35)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:17 PM

36. Only if you think he's correct.

 

His mistake is equating his morality with civil crimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #36)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:24 PM

37. I don't think he's correct

which is why I'm highlighting the important part of his interview, that part where he says “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.” but when that comes up you highlight the part where he says "priests found molesting children should not be forgiven, but instead imprisoned and banned" so unless you are saying he's right, and going along with him implying that abortion should have a worse punishment than that, you should say so.

This is the problem with the RCC, they make these statements, then the followers twist in knots trying to make it sound like something other than what he actually said quite plainly (well, almost, we just have to take their word that he actually said priests should be locked up) instead of condemning them, that is why you get labeled an enabler, because you are going to such extraordinary lengths to excuse his behavior and haven't actually said he is wrong, in fact you have more than implied that you agree with him, strictly on a moral level.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #37)

Mon May 6, 2013, 05:48 PM

38. Would you like my labels for you?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #38)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:28 PM

51. I just want one thing

and I've asked it many times in many different ways.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #51)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:32 PM

54. You won't get a direct answer. It's what he does.

All obfuscation, all the time. Pretty normal for this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #54)

Mon May 6, 2013, 09:37 PM

65. I can try

persistance is key.

I really don't see how hard it is to just stand up and say the guy is wrong, if you don't want to look like an enabler, then stand up and say so when the oppertunity comes up. In fact none of the usual bigot brushers have come in and said the guy was wrong, only the folks from the A&A group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #65)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:32 PM

69. I applaud your perserverence, but eventually you will need this.



In the end, it hurts less and it's more intelligent than what you're getting.


Good luck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #69)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:48 PM

73. It's something to do

takes my mind off homework, and churns the ole noggin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #73)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:13 PM

76. I wish you better luck and results than most others have gotten.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #76)

Tue May 7, 2013, 07:33 PM

82. He stopped responding to me

And see post 53, the one he stopped on, very telling...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #82)


Response to Name removed (Reply #87)

Tue May 7, 2013, 09:01 PM

89. Were that the case, he could end it with a simple "Yes" or "No"

Will you be the same way? or can you actually give a simple answer to a simple question?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #89)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:31 PM

113. I see you're still flying around the pile. So here's your answer.

 

No I don't agree with the statement but not for the reasons you likely have.

It's a stupid statement comparing apples and oranges. The difference is qualitative not quantitative.

I understand grappling with nuance may interfere with your homework, especially during finals week, but do give it a try. It may actually result in a productive discussion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #113)

Wed May 8, 2013, 03:08 AM

119. Almost a straight answer, Thank you

You can keep the ad homs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #10)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:09 PM

17. The clarification was not in quotes

so we don't know what he said, just that someone decided to cover his ass. Like the "Rape happens for a reason" crowd, they try to cover by clarifying "I don't know what that reason could be" as if that makes it ok, and when that unimportant bit gets left out they get to scream about how they were misquoted when the inevitable happens and sound like they aren't as cruel as they sound.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #17)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:20 PM

19. It didn't have an ellipsis either.

 

Do you doubt he said it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #19)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:39 PM

22. Nice job trying to muddy the waters

but yea, I do doubt he said it. He may have said something to that effect, but the words matter. Like I said above, the qualifying statement was "I don't know what that reason is" not anything to actually say that rape is bad, or that they disagree, or anything else to that affect, just that they don't know the reason.

So he may have said something hinting at it, or something unrelated that they interpreted as what was stated.

Also you are completely glossing over the spot where he said: “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

Can you comment on that statement without mentioning any other part of the interview, or anything else? what is your feeling on that sentence, all I ask.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #22)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:41 PM

23. You're right, words matter. All of them.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #23)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:46 PM

25. Like your thoughts on that statement

What are they? Agree? disagree? Can you give us a straight answer on this one subject, just this once? Please? Pretty please with sugar on top?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #25)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:47 PM

26. Sure I can.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #26)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:51 PM

30. But you won't prove it

I guess that we all have to take it on faith that you don't think “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #30)

Mon May 6, 2013, 06:21 PM

41. Ruggie would twist himself into a pretzel before he would give a straight answer

 

On whether he agrees that child rape is much more serious than abortion.

But it's amusing to watch him squirm...and fling more passive aggressive bullshit in the name of getting the last word.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skepticscott (Reply #41)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:32 PM

43. It's amusing to see you make your predictable personal attacks without making them directly.

 

Sad passive-aggressive scottie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #43)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:36 PM

46. Why would I waste my time

 

asking you directly? Your record with regard to forthrightness and intellectual honesty doesn't make that a worthwhile endeavor.

And like so many of your ilk, you rush to label a comment on your posting behavior as a "personal attack". Victims galore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skepticscott (Reply #46)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:39 PM

47. I didn't see a question just another pedictable personal attack.

 

But it's amusing to watch him squirm...and fling more passive aggressive bullshit in the name of getting the last word.


It's obvious why you choose to say it indirectly, scottie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #43)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:34 PM

56. It's even more amusing to see you accuse others of personal attacks while flinging personal attacks.

There is a better way: give direct answers.

But that's not what you do. You enjoy the obfuscation. Why, some might say its pathological.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #56)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:37 PM

57. Well given your (unedited) remarks about my dry wife, I find that incredibly hypocritical.

 

The only pathology I see is in your posts. Fortunately the author remains unseen and anonymous.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #57)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:40 PM

59. Your wife is dry?

:rotfl:

Uhm, okay?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #59)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:43 PM

60. Go on, explain yourself.

 

39. Denial is not a river in Egypt. And you would be the expert on dry an clinical.

At least according to your wife.


Let's hear you explain it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #60)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:44 PM

61. You explain it, your the expert on dry and clinical.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #61)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:45 PM

62. No you explain your own sexist bullshit.

 

Go on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #62)

Mon May 6, 2013, 09:14 PM

64. bwahahahaha!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #64)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:22 PM

66. I suppose that's the best you can do when confronted with your own sexist bullshit.

 

Go on, retreat to your smileys.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #66)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:27 PM

67. Bwahahahahaha! It's more than your bullshit deserves.




You're lucky you even get laughed at!




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #67)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:32 PM

68. Do you think anyone takes you seriously, apart from your yellow round smiley?

 

I didn't know it was possible for you to become any more of a parody but there you go.

It would be funny except for the sexism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #68)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:36 PM

70. Do you think anyone takes you seriously? At all?

I didn't know it was possible for you to become any more of a parody but there you go.

It would be funny except for the child-raping priest, misogyny, and hypocrisy in your church avoidance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #70)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:39 PM

71. Oh say anything at all about the RCC. I was speaking entirely about you.

 

You and your sexist posting.

Talk all you want about child-raping priests and the Crusades, it will not change who you are a single iota.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #71)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:47 PM

72. I was talking about you, too.

Keep avoiding the child-rape, misogyny, and hypocrisy in your church, it continues to let all know precisely who you are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #72)

Mon May 6, 2013, 10:56 PM

74. Just keep poting exactly what you're posting.

 

It's too difficult for you to keep the sexism from slipping out no matter how many edits you try. And that's entirely from you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #74)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:11 PM

75. You keep posting exactly what you do, too!

All that apologist bullshit for child-raping priests, misogyny, and hypocrisy in yiur church comes directly from you, no matter how much you try to obfuscate it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #75)

Mon May 6, 2013, 11:16 PM

77. You really don't get it.

 

All your blather and cartoons about child raping priests and misogyny in the church, accusing every Catholic of being an enabler and then you post that sexist bullshit right from your own fingertips. And you're called on it, ignore it, and blather on once again about child rape.

You'd be a laughingstock but no one is laughing, not even the yellow round smiley.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #77)

Tue May 7, 2013, 02:02 AM

78. Sorry, did you say something?

Nope. Just more of the usual!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #30)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:33 PM

44. Why, I thought you could figure it out by eliminating words.

 

I must have been mistaken.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #44)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:31 PM

53. If I were to put it together from everything you said, and refuse to say

then I would come to the conclusion that you agree with him. Not trying to insult or slam you, just answering your question, well statement. You should give it a shot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #25)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:50 PM

29. Well done. You painted him into a corner and you got the usual in return.

Pretty standard when it comes to RCC issues, especially child rape.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #29)

Mon May 6, 2013, 07:33 PM

45. Lol.

 

Remind me to never let you cook a steak.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #45)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:23 PM

49. Corner. Painted in. You.

And stale, dry retorts are all you have left.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Reply #49)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:33 PM

55. Yes, the combined intellectual firepower is too much to bear.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #55)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:39 PM

58. Humblebum had more intellectual firepower than you.

Maybe you should have taken notes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #10)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:17 PM

18. So if I said

Jaywalkers are worse than murderers, but murderers should go to jail too, that would be a perfectly good sentiment in your book.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #18)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:21 PM

20. Are you comparing jaywalking to abortion?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #20)

Mon May 6, 2013, 04:39 PM

21. I am certainly not going to compare abortion to

child rape!
And when some one does, just because he says child rape is bad too, his inappropriate comparison does not get a pass.
Though it obviously does to you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #21)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:24 PM

50. Most of the horrific shit done by the RCC gets a pass from him. That's apologetics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #21)


Response to Name removed (Reply #94)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:12 PM

101. even if one bothered to extend the bishop that courtesy..

 

..which i don't think OR believe he does, the result would be the same. he's *wrong* and both he and his followers got *nothing*.

nothing but snark and pleas to authority that nobody except fundie catholics respect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 06:17 PM

40. Settlements in RCC abuse cases now amount to 3 billion dollars, a tidy sum.

It amazes not that this needs to be downplayed.








edit: grammar challenged

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 08:28 PM

52. re:Fabio Martinez Castilla: Abortion is Worse Than Child Rape, Says Mexican Archbishop

wonder who he will protest when males have their tubes tied ? and a single male who never mearried . isnt allowed to marry knows a wonmans body more than her . give me a break.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2013, 09:12 PM

63. I assume he has first hand experience? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cleanhippie (Original post)

Tue May 7, 2013, 10:16 PM

105. really -- ask the children who were

raped by priests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread