Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumGod is opposed to food stamps? Let’s try an evidence-based approach to hunger instead.
Recently, I wrote about a Democratic Representative of Congress who used biblical arguments for doing something about global warming to counter a Republican Representatives biblical arguments for doing nothing about global warming. I advocated for evidence-based decisions rather than faith-based decisions, which put me on the do-something side.
Now we have a Republican who used biblical arguments against food stamps to counter Democrats who used biblical arguments for food stamps. During a meeting of the House Agricultural Committee, Tennessee Rep. Stephen Fincher quoted from Matthew and Thessalonians that the poor will always be with us and that those unwilling to work shall not eat. Fincher acknowledged that caring for the hungry might be something for Christians to do, but not with government money. While I strongly support separation of church and state, I think thats a rather bizarre framing of the concept. Private support for the least among us can be for religious or secular reasons, but I hope we will never have a government that ignores the least among us.
Unfortunately, biblical arguments have become so commonplace in politics that they are hardly worth noting. This one, however, has an added dimension. Although Fincher complained about Washington stealing taxpayer money from some and giving it to others, he had no problem with Washington giving him $3.48 million of taxpayer dollars since 1999 for farm subsidies. Last year he reportedly received over $70,000, which I assume he needed more than those low-income people he wants to cut from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Its easy for powerful members of Congress to help themselves to such largess and justify it biblically with God helps those who help themselves. Thats not really in the Bible, but no matter. It sounds like it could be, and thats good enough. If Rep. Fincher were to read his Bible carefully, he might find a word or two about hypocrites.
http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2013/6/12/god-is-opposed-to-food-stamps-let-s-try-an-evidence-based-approach-to-hunger-instead#
Now we have a Republican who used biblical arguments against food stamps to counter Democrats who used biblical arguments for food stamps. During a meeting of the House Agricultural Committee, Tennessee Rep. Stephen Fincher quoted from Matthew and Thessalonians that the poor will always be with us and that those unwilling to work shall not eat. Fincher acknowledged that caring for the hungry might be something for Christians to do, but not with government money. While I strongly support separation of church and state, I think thats a rather bizarre framing of the concept. Private support for the least among us can be for religious or secular reasons, but I hope we will never have a government that ignores the least among us.
Unfortunately, biblical arguments have become so commonplace in politics that they are hardly worth noting. This one, however, has an added dimension. Although Fincher complained about Washington stealing taxpayer money from some and giving it to others, he had no problem with Washington giving him $3.48 million of taxpayer dollars since 1999 for farm subsidies. Last year he reportedly received over $70,000, which I assume he needed more than those low-income people he wants to cut from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Its easy for powerful members of Congress to help themselves to such largess and justify it biblically with God helps those who help themselves. Thats not really in the Bible, but no matter. It sounds like it could be, and thats good enough. If Rep. Fincher were to read his Bible carefully, he might find a word or two about hypocrites.
http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2013/6/12/god-is-opposed-to-food-stamps-let-s-try-an-evidence-based-approach-to-hunger-instead#
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 968 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
God is opposed to food stamps? Let’s try an evidence-based approach to hunger instead. (Original Post)
cleanhippie
Jun 2013
OP
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)1. The problem is, “God helps those who help themselves,” isn't Biblical.
It appears Nowhere in the Bible. These sacrilegious goons are frauds.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)2. Jesus certainly believed in feeding the hungry
Remember when he multiplied the loaves and fishes to feed the multitude gathered to hear him speak?