Religion
Related: About this forumIn Sikh Response to Hateful Beating, A Lesson for Us All
http://www.nationofchange.org/groundbreaking-report-calculates-damage-done-fracking-1380897256Last month, after dropping off his wife and infant son at home, Dr. Prabhjot Singh went for an evening walk with a friend near Central Park in New York City. Minutes later, he was attacked by a group of young men who grabbed his beard and beat him while yelling "terrorist!" "get him!" and "Osama!"
The attack resulted in several lost teeth and a fractured jaw. At a press conference two days later, when asked what he might say to his perpetrators, Dr. Singh replied:
In the wake of Oak Creek and the attack on Dr. Singh, I have witnessed SALDEF, their affiliates, and the greater Sikh community embrace their crises with a clear message in alignment with their values of seva (selfless service), nimarta(respect and humility), sanghat (community), and most especially chardi kala(maintaining optimism and high spirits, even during times of adversity).
They prayed for their perpetrators, seeking not revenge but compassion and awareness. They did not speak against Muslims, with whom they are mistakenly identified, but advocated for respect and understanding of all faiths. They did not surrender to rage in defense of their freedom of religion and expression, but welcomed questions about their faith. These are actions and values that are inherently Sikh. They are also inherently American.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)No question.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Which is more likely...that the perpetrators are Christian, or atheist?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)But I imagine them to be Christians in name only.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)that the "No True Christian" argument is intellectually bankrupt.
Try again.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Anyone can claim to be anything. That doesn't make it so.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Give us THE list of the things someone has to do, say, confess to and believe in order to be "True" Christian. And then give your irrefutable evidence and arguments as to why no one who doesn't do every one of those things can possibly be considered a "True" Christian.
Failure to respond with an actual list, and attempts to deflect from the need for one will be considered proof of your intellectual bankruptcy.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)"will be considered proof".
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)that you don't have jack to back up your statement? Just more dodges and deflection, as is endemic on this board.
"No True [insert anything]" is a horseshit argument. Always has been. Always will be. But feel free to use it as much as you need to if it makes you feel at home here.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Are you trying to start something? WTF?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 6, 2013, 09:25 PM - Edit history (1)
that the people involved are "Christians in name only". You were asked for the criteria that someone has to meet to be a "True" Christian, not just one "in name only". You dodged that request, and didn't provide squat (because, as every intelligent person reading this knows, you have none that pass the laugh test, other than your own purely subjective and invented opinions). Which, unless someone (like maybe, Jesus) has appointed you personally as arbiter of who is and isn't a "True" Christian, are irrelevant and worthless.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)was driven by their hate, but I don't see that they have been identified.
What was nice to read is that people in the neighborhood came to his assistance and possibly saved his life.
He is the opposite of those that attacked him.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Looks like he was attacked by a rather large gang, but that many others in the community helped him.
rug
(82,333 posts)I think this is the link you want to put in.
http://www.yesmagazine.org/peace-justice/in-sikh-response-to-hateful-beating-a-lesson-for-all-of-us