This message was self-deleted by its author

[hrmjustin]

This message was self-deleted by its author (hrmjustin) on Fri Oct 2, 2015, 08:45 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[Heddi]

1. Who's your buddy?

give us a name so we can pray more directly.

[hrmjustin]

2. He knows who he is.

[AtheistCrusader]

3. No worries, we can recognize patterns as well.

I'll take a hit in his memory as well.

[hrmjustin]

4. I am sorry Atheistcrusader i don't get your post.

[AtheistCrusader]

10. Same mechanism as the other thread.

You didn't object to it when I posted it first time, so I presume it's acceptable. If the SOP changed, I haven't reviewed it today. Apologies in advance if so.

[hrmjustin]

11. Posted what?

[AtheistCrusader]

12. My last thread in this venue.

We actually talked about it for a few posts. Seemed ok.

[hrmjustin]

13. Thd pot thread?

[AtheistCrusader]

14. Yeah. I can't sort by thread on my phone, so I can't get it for you.

First Church of Cannabis.
They let me in.

[hrmjustin]

15. oh congratulations.

[Heddi]

5. Yeah but I don't. I'd like to know who I'm praying for

Maybe it's someone that I dislike, like the guy whose dog takes a poop on my front stoop every day and he maybe picks it up one out of 4 times. I don't want to pray for that guy.

You kind of owe it to your audience if you want them to pray for someone.

[rug]

7. Who said prayers don't work?

[hrmjustin]

8. lol not me.

[kentauros]

9. Oh, you're bad!

[An Atheist]

16. Jury results

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service On Thu Jun 4, 2015, 07:31 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Yeah but I don't. I'd like to know who I'm praying for

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1225&pid=683

REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS Disruptive post in the Prayer Circke safe haven.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jun 4, 2015, 07:51 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: I think I could support most hides within this "safe haven". Just not sure that this "prayer request" is what this haven is all about. Have to leave it alone without a tad more explanation.

Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Seems like an overreaction. Seems like Heddi is the voice of reason by proving constructive feedback.

Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: What kind of ass-hat harasses someone asking for prayers? If you don't wanna send up a prayer, bugger off and leave the person alone. Hide this tool. -N

Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: What an awful place. How petty to ban a poster just because they don't pray. Maybe instead of making nasty comments about a respected DUer who is loved by all, the hosts should rewrite their sop which says "All are welcome, regardless of faith or spiritual persuasion". Too bad they don't practice what they preach. Ugh.

[truebrit71]

17. Wow, not satisfied with banning the poster you alert on the thread as well....

.... speaks volumes about your character....

[hrmjustin]

19. Not my alert but i wish you guys would n8t post these jury results in this room.

[Kurska]

20. I'll self delete and pm the guy.

I respect your safe haven status.

[hrmjustin]

21. Thank you.

[Kurska]

23. No problem EOM

[hrmjustin]

22. Can you please self delete this and send it to the poster in a pm.

Thank you.

[hrmjustin]

24. Your still in my prayers.

[hrmjustin]

25. kick.

[XemaSab]

27. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Tue Sep 29, 2015, 08:34 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

In my prayers, buddy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/123046420

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is a not so veiled personal attack on another member's post on the passing of DUer xchrom.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1225678

All you have to do is read the first reply.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Sep 29, 2015, 08:46 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seriously, this bullshit is above my pay grade.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: meh
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm a lumberjack and I'm okay
I sleep all night and I work all day
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[okasha]

28. Thank you XemaSab .

That was a truly pathetic case of alert-trolling.

Three months? Really? Someone's clearly obsessed with the OP.

[hrmjustin]

29. Hey Okasha!my sentence is over.

[okasha]

30. Great!

Some pathetic critter is trying to get you a new one, though. May the Lord Coyote rain down--uh, blessings-- on whoever it is.

[hrmjustin]

31. How are you?

[okasha]

32. Slightly deranged,

settling into the rhythm of the fall semester. It does get easier.

[hrmjustin]

33. Rug was asking about your newterm. I didn't know if it had started yet.

He missed you.

[okasha]

34. I've missed him.

I should be back in a week or so. Will probably spend much of next week making glazes, then some time should free up for more than reading here.

[hrmjustin]

35. Enjoy and good luck with school.

[kdmorris]

36. You can't alert after 24 hours

These are the jury results from rug's alert on Heddi's post in A&A. (I know it was rug's alert because he accidentally sent it to the group hosts first)

So, yeah, I think that this case of alert trolling is truly pathetic (not to mention a lie, since we didn't learn about xchrom's passing until June 13).

[okasha]

37. That,'a what I thought,

but the rules have become --flexible --lately. So what we have here is a straight up violation of a safe haven, and a dig at Justin. The rules in this group, however, are not flexible.

Xema Sab has been blocked from this group.

[rug]

38. Heddi's mocking of this safe haven is what is pathertic.

Along with your defense of it.

[okasha]

39. Hey, rug.

You could edit eight words out of your post title and still be right.

That post and some of its answers are pure grade A hypocrisy, given that the same little gaggle has attempted to get threads locked in safe havens as SOP violations.

And it's obviously aimed at Justin as well as you, or it wouldn't be posted in this thread.

[rug]

40. Yup, nothing more than mockery of this group.

Last edited Thu Oct 1, 2015, 02:38 PM - Edit history (1)

I thought Justin's thread was about xchrom who died around that time but it turns out it was about NYC SKP.

Either way, the trolling of this group is evident in that thread. And of course, they still have no compunctions at all about continuing it.

[hrmjustin]

41. It was an honest mistake but of course it will be thrown in your face till the end of time.

[rug]

42. Monkeys tend to do that.

[okasha]

43. They are what they are.

But this is probably as good a place as any to note that zero tolerance is now in effect in this group.

[hrmjustin]

44. So glad we have great hosts of this group.

[okasha]

45. We had an excellent role model.

[hrmjustin]

46. Lol well others may disagree but thank you.

[rug]

47. They sure are.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/123046420#post42

[okasha]

48. I could have written those responses for them

in my sleep, right down to the punctuation. They're kind of like a political candidate who hasn't had a new idea in forty years. All scripted, no improv.