Wed Mar 28, 2012, 11:43 PM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
Any other Carl Jung fans here???
I've been reading his stuff and it has been very enlightening for this "introverted sensation" type.
![]()
|
10 replies, 6535 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Odin2005 | Mar 2012 | OP |
Gurgen4 | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
GliderGuider | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
mecherosegarden | Feb 2013 | #10 | |
Odin2005 | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
Shagman | May 2012 | #7 | |
GliderGuider | May 2012 | #8 | |
tama | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
Still Blue in PDX | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
Omniscientone | May 2012 | #6 | |
deJong | Nov 2012 | #9 |
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 03:37 AM
Gurgen4 (39 posts)
1. No offense, but...
I've always considered Carl Jung more or less a reactionary and banal fool especially when you put him beside Freud and Marx and his other contemporaries.
Here are some examples of Jung's morally and logically bankrupt ideology. Most of it is subversive, insidious and downright creepy. "Your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes." (Makes no sense whatsoever) Man needs difficulties; they are necessary for health. (Huh?) In all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order. (Kant actually refuted this line of thaught.) The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely. (Especially if you're a mass murderer, a Nazi, a boor. ) I have treated many hundreds of patients. Among those in the second half of life - that is to say, over 35 - there has not been one whose problem in the last resort was not that of finding a religious outlook on life. (Reactionary bullshit.) |
Response to Gurgen4 (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 12:48 PM
GliderGuider (21,088 posts)
2. Interesting. I read all the quotes you posted
and found them self-evident, obviously true in my own experience. I find Jung's insight much deeper than Freud's.
It's interesting how two such intelligent people as you and I can have such polar opposite views of life, isn't it? |
Response to GliderGuider (Reply #2)
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:12 AM
mecherosegarden (745 posts)
10. +1
N/T
|
Response to Gurgen4 (Reply #1)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 08:17 PM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
3. he was speaking from a psychological prespective, not a philosophical one.
He was speaking of lived human experience rather than metaphysics. And he is using "Religion" in a different way most people use it today.
The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely. (Especially if you're a mass murderer, a Nazi, a boor. )
He was speaking of the Shadow complex, here. The things we hate and deny in ourselves are what you repress and then project onto other people. |
Response to Gurgen4 (Reply #1)
Sun May 27, 2012, 12:54 PM
Shagman (135 posts)
7. easy to misinterpret
You need a little background in Eastern thought systems before Jung's deeper meanings make any sense. He seems to have foreseen some of our postmodern avenues of scientific research, such as chaos theory and quantum mechanics, which were also informed by Eastern thought. I'm not keen on synchronicity, but that may be because I don't understand quantum physics as well as I'd like.
|
Response to Shagman (Reply #7)
Mon May 28, 2012, 08:32 PM
GliderGuider (21,088 posts)
8. The idea of synchronicity feels like an intuitive recognition of quantum entanglement.
Physicists hate it when we say things like that.
![]() |
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 10:55 AM
tama (9,137 posts)
4. Yup
I've read only the autobiography and bits from here and there. His influence spreads to many directions. A local public shaman tells that reading Jung during his most difficult time helped him a lot not to feel so alone with his experiences. Pauli, one of the fathers of Quantum theory, shared Jung's interest in what Jung called synchronicity: http://www.metanexus.net/essay/wolfgang-pauli-carl-jung-and-acausal-connecting-principle-case-study-transdisciplinarity
|
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 10:39 PM
Still Blue in PDX (1,999 posts)
5. I sort of know about jungian archetypes as they apply to the Tarot.
That's all.
![]() |
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Sun May 20, 2012, 01:03 AM
Omniscientone (12 posts)
6. I have just discovered Jung's stuff
and it is fantastic. I want to get my hands on The Red Book and read it.
|
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 04:30 PM
deJong (7 posts)
9. fan
I've been a fan of Jung since I was a teen and read Memories, Dreams, Reflections. He inspired me to go to school and become a psychologist. And those quotes that the earlier poster was disparaging? They all make sense to me. And it's pretty easy to take a single sentence out of context and mock it.
|