Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumMore information on the Exploration Gateway at Earth-Moon L2
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2188/1
A glimpse at a gateway
by Jeff Foust
Monday, November 12, 2012
<snip>
On Saturday, however, a NASA official provided a glimpse about what the agency was currently studying. Speaking at SpaceVision 2012, the annual conference of Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) in Buffalo, New York, Harold White, Advanced Propulsion Theme Lead at the Johnson Space Center, discussed the current state of NASAs studies of what it calls the Gateway Exploration Architecture. White, better known in some circles for his work on advanced propulsion physics (see Building a starships foundation, The Space Review, September 24, 2012), is the propulsion lead on the architecture study.
<snip>
The architecture starts in 2019 with the launch of the core spacecrafta generic service module plus a docking node similar to those on the US segment of the International Space Stationon a Space Launch System (SLS) heavy-lift rocket to the Earth-Moon L2 point. Then we would have a cadence of missions, about once every year, White said, increasing the mission duration and, in some cases, also increasing the capability of the platform by bringing up additional modules.
The initial crewed mission would fly to the platform at L2 on an Orion spacecraft launched by an SLS. That mission would last about 30 days, in order to gain experience on operations there. Before departing, the platform would transfer from the L2 to the L1 point on the other side of the Moon. After the crew left, the station would then move into a near rectilinear orbit, a stretched version of the halo orbits used to stationkeep around Lagrange points that, in this case, gives long dwell times over the lunar poles.
<snip>
The current architecture features what White called a decision tollgate in 2022: in effect, a fork in the road with two options. In one approach, the platform moves to low lunar orbit, where it could later support human missions to the lunar surface. ... <snip> ...
In the other option, the platform would move out into deep space, perhaps out to the Earth-Sun L2 point, about 1.5 million kilometers from the Earth, ... <snip> ...
<snip>
A glimpse at a gateway
by Jeff Foust
Monday, November 12, 2012
<snip>
On Saturday, however, a NASA official provided a glimpse about what the agency was currently studying. Speaking at SpaceVision 2012, the annual conference of Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) in Buffalo, New York, Harold White, Advanced Propulsion Theme Lead at the Johnson Space Center, discussed the current state of NASAs studies of what it calls the Gateway Exploration Architecture. White, better known in some circles for his work on advanced propulsion physics (see Building a starships foundation, The Space Review, September 24, 2012), is the propulsion lead on the architecture study.
<snip>
The architecture starts in 2019 with the launch of the core spacecrafta generic service module plus a docking node similar to those on the US segment of the International Space Stationon a Space Launch System (SLS) heavy-lift rocket to the Earth-Moon L2 point. Then we would have a cadence of missions, about once every year, White said, increasing the mission duration and, in some cases, also increasing the capability of the platform by bringing up additional modules.
The initial crewed mission would fly to the platform at L2 on an Orion spacecraft launched by an SLS. That mission would last about 30 days, in order to gain experience on operations there. Before departing, the platform would transfer from the L2 to the L1 point on the other side of the Moon. After the crew left, the station would then move into a near rectilinear orbit, a stretched version of the halo orbits used to stationkeep around Lagrange points that, in this case, gives long dwell times over the lunar poles.
<snip>
The current architecture features what White called a decision tollgate in 2022: in effect, a fork in the road with two options. In one approach, the platform moves to low lunar orbit, where it could later support human missions to the lunar surface. ... <snip> ...
In the other option, the platform would move out into deep space, perhaps out to the Earth-Sun L2 point, about 1.5 million kilometers from the Earth, ... <snip> ...
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1731 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More information on the Exploration Gateway at Earth-Moon L2 (Original Post)
bananas
Nov 2012
OP
bananas
(27,509 posts)1. For Obama’s Second Term, NASA Revives a Plan from Clinton’s Second Term
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/11/we-might-return-to-the-moon-or-we-might-not/
For Obamas Second Term, NASA Revives a Plan from Clintons Second Term
By David S. F. PortreeEmail Author
November 9, 2012 | 12:07 am |
<snip>
NASAs interest in the L point outpost concept is not new. In 1999-2000, Earth-moon and Earth-Sun L points became the darlings of the Decadal Planning Team (DPT), a NASA-wide group funded by President Bill Clintons Office of Management and Budget. The DPT seems to have been set up to develop plans that could take effect under President Al Gore.
The DPT advocated an outpost at Earth-moon L1, located between Earth and the moon. Astronauts at the outpost would have serviced giant space telescopes and visited the lunar surface (robotics technology was less advanced than it is today, so the DPT barely mentioned teleoperations in its plan).
Apart from its lunar objective, however, the DPTs philosophy was anathema to space planners eager for a reprise of NASAs Apollo glory days. Progress would have occurred on a pay-as-you-go basis, with no high-profile proclamation akin to President John F. Kennedys May 1961 moon speech. Development would have been slow and steady, with no sharp increases in NASAs budget to draw fire from spaceflight opponents.
The DPTs plans survived more or less intact until 2005, when President George W. Bush appointed Mike Griffin as NASA Administrator. Griffin and his lieutenants rejected the DPT approach in favor of a costly new large rocket and Apollo on steroids. Bush did not, however, adequately fund Griffins program, so NASA had little to show for it by the time President Barack Obama won the White House in 2008.
<snip>
For Obamas Second Term, NASA Revives a Plan from Clintons Second Term
By David S. F. PortreeEmail Author
November 9, 2012 | 12:07 am |
<snip>
NASAs interest in the L point outpost concept is not new. In 1999-2000, Earth-moon and Earth-Sun L points became the darlings of the Decadal Planning Team (DPT), a NASA-wide group funded by President Bill Clintons Office of Management and Budget. The DPT seems to have been set up to develop plans that could take effect under President Al Gore.
The DPT advocated an outpost at Earth-moon L1, located between Earth and the moon. Astronauts at the outpost would have serviced giant space telescopes and visited the lunar surface (robotics technology was less advanced than it is today, so the DPT barely mentioned teleoperations in its plan).
Apart from its lunar objective, however, the DPTs philosophy was anathema to space planners eager for a reprise of NASAs Apollo glory days. Progress would have occurred on a pay-as-you-go basis, with no high-profile proclamation akin to President John F. Kennedys May 1961 moon speech. Development would have been slow and steady, with no sharp increases in NASAs budget to draw fire from spaceflight opponents.
The DPTs plans survived more or less intact until 2005, when President George W. Bush appointed Mike Griffin as NASA Administrator. Griffin and his lieutenants rejected the DPT approach in favor of a costly new large rocket and Apollo on steroids. Bush did not, however, adequately fund Griffins program, so NASA had little to show for it by the time President Barack Obama won the White House in 2008.
<snip>