Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 02:58 PM Mar 2013

Mars Rover Curiosity Has First Big Malfunction

Marc Kaufman
for National Geographic News
Published March 1, 2013

The Mars rover Curiosity experienced its first significant malfunction on Wednesday, when one of its two onboard computers became corrupted and failed to turn off and enter "sleep mode" as planned.

The Curiosity team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory sent up commands to switch all operations from the corrupted A computer to the twin B computer early Thursday morning, according to a Thursday NASA statement.

Most spacecraft have a backup computer to step in if the primary computer fails. (Related: Meet One of Curiosity's Earthbound Twins.)

Richard Cook, project manager for the Curiosity project, said the problem was the most serious experienced by the rover so far in its nearly 7 months on the red planet.

Cook said the team was most concerned Wednesday night, before they got a handle on the nature of the problem. But once they began to understand better, it became clear that switching to the other computer was necessary and unlikely to have long-term consequences.

He said he hoped Curiosity would resume science work in about a week.

more

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/03/130301-mars-rover-curiosity-malfunction-science-space-nasa-jpl/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mars Rover Curiosity Has First Big Malfunction (Original Post) n2doc Mar 2013 OP
I worked on a team writing code for a NASA satellite ground station. drm604 Mar 2013 #1
Thanks for posting this. red dog 1 Mar 2013 #2

drm604

(16,230 posts)
1. I worked on a team writing code for a NASA satellite ground station.
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 04:24 PM
Mar 2013

This was back in the late 80s, early 90s. All of the code was written so as to store regular checkpoints so that if it became necessary to fail over to the backup computer, it could resume where it had left off without any loss of state or data.

NASA is big on redundancy, for obvious reasons.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Mars Rover Curiosity Has ...