Science
Related: About this forumPhysicist Proposes New Way To Think About Intelligence
By: Chris Gorski, ISNS
(ISNS) -- A single equation grounded in basic physics principles could describe intelligence and stimulate new insights in fields as diverse as finance and robotics, according to new research.
Alexander Wissner-Gross, a physicist at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Cameron Freer, a mathematician at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, developed an equation that they say describes many intelligent or cognitive behaviors, such as upright walking and tool use.
The researchers suggest that intelligent behavior stems from the impulse to seize control of future events in the environment. This is the exact opposite of the classic science-fiction scenario in which computers or robots become intelligent, then set their sights on taking over the world.
The findings describe a mathematical relationship that can "spontaneously induce remarkably sophisticated behaviors associated with the human 'cognitive niche,' including tool use and social cooperation, in simple physical systems," the researchers wrote in a paper published today in the journal Physical Review Letters.
more
http://www.insidescience.org/content/physicist-proposes-new-way-think-about-intelligence/987
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)in my layman's opinion.
"The proposal requires that a system be able to process information and predict future histories very quickly in order for it to exhibit intelligent behavior. Wissner-Gross suggested that the new findings fit well within an argument linking the origin of intelligence to natural selection and Darwinian evolution -- that nothing besides the laws of nature are needed to explain intelligence."
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Sounds like something that could rapidly become infinitely recursive, and probably should be avoided
delrem
(9,688 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Is self awareness necessary for intelligence?
Or vice versa for that matter.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Too often not, from what I've seen. Rightwingers are extremely self aware. Exclusively. But intelligence? That defies belief.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)"The universe exists in the present state that it has right now. It can go off in lots of different directions. My proposal is that intelligence is a process that attempts to capture future histories," said Wissner-Gross.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Well suggest that scientists need to keep looking for intelligence and wisdom - it has to be somewhere out there.
it sure ain't on this planet!
littlemissmartypants
(22,656 posts)"The researchers suggest that intelligent behavior stems from the impulse to seize control of future events in the environment."
bananas
(27,509 posts)If they put this into smartphones, it'll be like living with your mother!
"Pick up your socks!"
"Don't drive so fast!"
Archaic
(273 posts)Very interesting. I have a buddy who is WAY into cognitive neuroscience, and he'll get a kick out of this.
bananas
(27,509 posts)website: http://www.alexwg.org/
paper: http://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pdf
skynet/terminator/forbin video:
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)I was talking with another DUer... Was it gliderguider? But he was talking about a project to characterize and monitor consumption in terms of entropy. The conversation moved to information entropy, and how all the concepts of entropy are really connected and central to everything - and how in this concept may be the really big fish in the sea of scientific breakthroughs.
It has the ability to solve so many problems. Oddly, in many cases it requires a stream good, truly random numbers too. Entropy is a probabilistic entity. However due to Quantum Mechanics, we now know that at a fundamental level our universe may be a probabilistic entropy (God does play dice) too.
hunter
(38,311 posts)Accelerando by Charles Stross
The ebook is Creative Commons Free!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)But Peter Watts' Blindsight is even more focused on these sorts of questions.
Also Creative Commons free.. http://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)That still does not get at what it is to experience the color red. It may be that perceptual consciousness emerges from sufficiently complex functional consciousness, we just don't know.