Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 04:11 AM Apr 2013

Four-thousand year old gold-adorned skeleton found near Windsor

Last edited Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Archaeologists, excavating near the Royal Borough, have discovered the 4400 year old gold-adorned skeleton of an upper class woman who was almost certainly a member of the local ruling elite.

She is the earliest known woman adorned with such treasures ever found in Britain.

The individual, aged around 40, was buried, wearing a necklace of folded sheet gold, amber and lignite beads, just a century or two after the construction of Stonehenge some 60 miles to the south-west. Even the buttons, thought to have been used to secure the upper part of her now long-vanished burial garment, were made of amber. She also appears to have worn a bracelet of lignite beads.

The archaeologist in charge of the excavation, Gareth Chaffey of Wessex Archaeology, believes that she may have been a person of power – perhaps even the prehistoric equivalent of a princess or queen.

It’s known that in southern Britain, some high status men of that era – the Copper Age – had gold possessions, but this is the first time archaeologists have found a woman of that period being accorded the same sort of material status.



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/fourthousand-year-old-goldadorned-skeleton-found-near-windsor-8581819.html














18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Four-thousand year old gold-adorned skeleton found near Windsor (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 OP
From Wessex Archaeology ... eppur_se_muova Apr 2013 #1
added the photos in the link thanks N/t Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #5
Interesting. I wonder what that society was like. /nt Ash_F Apr 2013 #2
This article is slightly out of archaeological date. Stonehenge has been pushed back 5k yrs earlier. DRoseDARs Apr 2013 #3
I think they are referring to Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #4
No; they just found a settlement 2km from Stonehenge that was 5000 years older than it muriel_volestrangler Apr 2013 #6
Why do non-Scientists insist on writing science articles? Goddamn it that's obnoxious. nt DRoseDARs Apr 2013 #9
Maybe there aren't enough scientists writing for the average reader FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #10
For those who can't easily relate to that area dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #7
Or, perhaps for those not British, in the middle of the reservoirs under the Heathrow flight path muriel_volestrangler Apr 2013 #8
Angling for donkeys ? Peculiar behavior for a Democrat. nt eppur_se_muova Apr 2013 #11
Its what we call dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #12
Thanks for the explanation ... eppur_se_muova Apr 2013 #13
Coarse fishing dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #14
The origin of the name is not as clear-cut as I thought ... eppur_se_muova Apr 2013 #15
Interesting dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #16
Donkeys years Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2013 #17
Way cool. I love British history. HooptieWagon Apr 2013 #18
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
3. This article is slightly out of archaeological date. Stonehenge has been pushed back 5k yrs earlier.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 05:24 AM
Apr 2013

Announced just yesterday.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,262 posts)
6. No; they just found a settlement 2km from Stonehenge that was 5000 years older than it
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:13 AM
Apr 2013

Here's the website for the excavation: http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/classical-studies/amesbury/index.shtml

The dating of Stonehenge has not changed. Discovery just wrote a misleading title for their web page.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
10. Maybe there aren't enough scientists writing for the average reader
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 02:52 PM
Apr 2013

In pursuit of new knowledge, they might forget the value in talking "down" to the average citizen and explaining what they're learned.

But science needs the support of the whole community. Needs the money to test the latest theories; needs the good will of the community to teach the real stuff in schools and not someone's fairy tale.

That requires that we all understand and appreciate as much of this vast, ongoing accumulation of knowledge as possible.

All of us; including those who haven't spent the years of advanced study necessary to understand all the details.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
7. For those who can't easily relate to that area
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:17 AM
Apr 2013

its the end of the southern Colne Valley which runs down from St Albans. That's a huge gravel strip from the end of the last ice age here. Most of the pits in that area have been using for angling for donkeys years now - I use some myself. The one referred to here must be one which is still being worked and its good to know that Cemex are working closely with the archeologists.

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
13. Thanks for the explanation ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 05:20 PM
Apr 2013

I figured there was some kind of "sea donkey" or something, but couldn't imagine what it was.

(I don't know what a "coarse" is either, BTW .. )

There's a reason it's known as Angle-land.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
14. Coarse fishing
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 05:34 PM
Apr 2013

is everyday freshwater fish in lake and rivers. That excludes some trout and salmon which are game fish. What are in the sea are classed as sea fishing. Coarse and game require licenses to fish.

btw - the guy in the picture and I have been friends since we were 5 years old.

In passing - the Angles were those from what is now southern Denmark who settled here long ways back.

See :

Settlers in Britain

The Romans invaded Britain in AD43. After that, for 400 years southern Britain was part of the Roman world. The last Roman soldiers left Britain in AD 410, and then new people came in ships across the North Sea. Historians call them Anglo-Saxons. The new settlers were a mixture of people from north Germany, Denmark and northern Holland. Most were Saxons, Angles and Jutes. There were some Franks and Frisians too. If we use the modern names for the countries they came from, the Saxons, Franks and Frisians were German-Dutch, the Angles were southern Danish, and Jutes were northern Danish.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primaryhistory/anglo_saxons/who_were_the_anglo-saxons/

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
15. The origin of the name is not as clear-cut as I thought ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 05:41 PM
Apr 2013

The name of the Angles is thought to derive from the name of the area they inhabited, Angeln. The latter has been hypothesized to originate from the Germanic root for "narrow" (compare German eng = "narrow&quot , meaning "the Narrow [Water]", i.e. the Schlei estuary; the root would be angh, "tight". Another theory is that the name meant "hook", as in angling for fish; Julius Pokorny, a major Indo-European linguist, derives it from *ang-, "bend" (see ankle).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angeln#Name

I thought the Angles were so named for their habit of fishing.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
18. Way cool. I love British history.
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 02:35 AM
Apr 2013

My earliest known ancestors (mothers side) were from Saxony. Emmigrated to Brittany, then a short time in Normandy (couple hundred years), then to England at or about the time of the Norman invasion. I like learning what they were about...how they lived, might have dressed, etc.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Four-thousand year old go...