Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:08 PM Jun 2013

Why Having A Liquid Nitrogen Pool Party Is A Bad Idea

Note to Fox News: it wasn't a cloud of toxic chlorine.
By Francie Diep


So you probably know it's not a good idea to swim in a pool with liquid nitrogen. You might not know exactly why—we'll discuss this further ahead—but it just sounds like a bad idea, right?

Right. German liquor company Jägermeister recently hosted a party in Mexico, during which staffers poured what appeared to be numerous 10-liter dewars of liquid nitrogen into the water, creating a foggy effect. In videos, you can hear partiers "Woo!"-ing… and then, not two minutes later, those not in the water pointing and saying, in Spanish, "Somebody's fainted. Someone else has fainted." Another video shows partiers jumping into the pool to pull limp bodies out of the water.

What happened? Not what others have reported, according to ChemBark, a blog by St. Louis University chemist Paul Bracher. Fox News Latino, the U.K.'s the Daily Mail, KTLA and others have said the nitrogen reacted with chlorine in the pool to form a "toxic cloud."

"This is almost certainly incorrect," Bracher wrote. Actually, molecular nitrogen is inert and shouldn't react with anything in the pool, he said. Instead, the nitrogen displaced oxygen from the air above the pool, "leaving none for the swimmers to breathe." Yipes!

more
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-06/why-having-liquid-nitrogen-pool-party-bad-idea

There is no "almost certainly" about it. N2 is essentially inert unless very high energies are applied to it, or certain catalysts (biological or otherwise).

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Having A Liquid Nitrogen Pool Party Is A Bad Idea (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2013 OP
Hm. About breathing nitrogen: Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #1
Well, actually, Jack Nicholson, et al, do breathe nitrogen...with every breath... DreamGypsy Jun 2013 #5
correct on being inert SCantiGOP Jun 2013 #15
1954 -- New Mexico Military institute Downwinder Jun 2013 #2
Hold my beer. WATCH THIS!! longship Jun 2013 #3
LHe? That stuff is lethal. It can freeze you, asphyxiate you and explode, all at once. DetlefK Jun 2013 #8
Uhm! No! It cannot explode. longship Jun 2013 #10
I'm not talking about combustion. I'm talking thermal expansion. DetlefK Jun 2013 #11
Helium will suffocate you just as fast. formercia Jun 2013 #19
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb Warpy Jun 2013 #4
Dry ice would do the same thing JayhawkSD Jun 2013 #6
The big difference is that CO2 rwsanders Jun 2013 #16
2 posters hit the nail on the head TxDemChem Jun 2013 #7
It certainly did not react. N2 is called an "inert gas" in industry. eppur_se_muova Jun 2013 #12
I know! TxDemChem Jun 2013 #14
N2 will react. formercia Jun 2013 #20
Yes, yes ... with magnesium, with lithium. Not with anything found in a pool at room temp. eppur_se_muova Jun 2013 #21
I sense mercuryblues Jun 2013 #9
Well, DUH ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inert_gas_asphyxiation eppur_se_muova Jun 2013 #13
1986: 1700 dead at Lake Lyos, Cameroon Iterate Jun 2013 #17
unsurprisingly this has made it to the "Cool" classification intaglio Jun 2013 #18

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
5. Well, actually, Jack Nicholson, et al, do breathe nitrogen...with every breath...
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:03 AM
Jun 2013

...since the Earth's atmosphere is ~78% nitrogen. However, our lungs only absorb the oxygen, and only a small part of the oxygen, ~20% of the atmosphere, on each breath. The nitrogen acts as an inert gas.

However, some animals inhale other bad things.

SCantiGOP

(13,866 posts)
15. correct on being inert
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 04:06 PM
Jun 2013

That is why potato chip bags are filled so fully with nitrogen. Unlike regular air, that would ruin the chips in a few days, the nitrogen cannot react with the organic matter so it stays fresh.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
2. 1954 -- New Mexico Military institute
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jun 2013

On May 31, 1954 between 9 and 9:30 p.m., tragedy struck during Final Ball. Three cadets, Donald Wallace Vertress, Wood Mullinax Moore and Perry George Vlahopoulas, were assisting with decorations for Final Ball in the Luna Natatorium when a pump used to spray water malfunctioned. The three decided to prime the pump and in doing so went into the swimming pool where carbon dioxide was given off by dry ice on a platform under a decorative bridge across the pool. The noxious gas given off by the dry ice suffocated or asphyxiated the cadets. The announcement was made to a stunned and grief torn crowd about 10:30 that evening, turning one of the NMMI's finest galas into one of its greatest tragedies.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Hold my beer. WATCH THIS!!
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jun 2013

Darwin Award coming right up.

Anyway, they should have used liquid helium. It's crazy stuff.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
8. LHe? That stuff is lethal. It can freeze you, asphyxiate you and explode, all at once.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:16 AM
Jun 2013

There are reasons for laboratory safety briefings. If you don't watch out, if you don't know what you are doing, if you don't keep a clear head
That.
Stuff.
Can.
Kill.
You.

longship

(40,416 posts)
10. Uhm! No! It cannot explode.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 10:30 AM
Jun 2013

Helium is an inert gas and does not interact with anything.

I've worked with it; it's weird stuff, but relatively safe. (For stuff that's at about 3 degrees above absolute zero.)

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
11. I'm not talking about combustion. I'm talking thermal expansion.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 10:44 AM
Jun 2013

Even the tiniest amounts of energy are enough to bring it to boil and it has a far greater volume as gas than as liquid. If that much heat sneaks in while the liquid Helium is in a closed vessel, the pressure will rise until the vessel explodes (if some idiot forgot to open the safety valve), sending shrapnel flying, pushing oxygen out and freezing the vicinity so cold, you get skin-damage.


I've worked with it, too, occasionally refilling the LHe-cryostat of a low-temperature STM.

Warpy

(111,174 posts)
4. Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:58 PM
Jun 2013

The same intensity of lethal fog could have been had for a lot less money with a few hundred pounds of dry ice.

If you want to kill off your guests, why waste money on liquid nitrogen?

(something tells me a "molecular gastronomist" was catering this disaster)

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
6. Dry ice would do the same thing
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

Carbon dioxide would also displace the oxygen and suffocate the swimmers.

rwsanders

(2,594 posts)
16. The big difference is that CO2
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jun 2013

would trigger the bodies defenses and they would know something is wrong. If the O2 is displaced, they would never feel short of breath.
There were a few USCG inspectors (and others) entering enclosed spaces that died because rusting actually consumed the O2 and left air that wouldn't support life, but didn't provoke the feeling SOB.

TxDemChem

(1,918 posts)
7. 2 posters hit the nail on the head
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:10 AM
Jun 2013

We breathe air that is approximately 78% N2 and 21% O2. Our bodies metabolize the O2 for various processes required to biologically function. The size of a diatomic oxygen molecule is very similar to that of diatomic nitrogen and carbon monoxide; therefore, in the presence of extreme concentrations of N2 or CO, the O2 is displaced and we essentially are suffocated. You will get lightheaded and possibly faint, or worse, die.

Figured I'd also add that diatomic nitrogen has a triple covalent bond, so it is pretty inert; it would take some work to break those bonds. I seriously doubt the nitrogen reacted with much of the chlorine to form any sort of hazardous product.

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
12. It certainly did not react. N2 is called an "inert gas" in industry.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:42 PM
Jun 2013

Find an easy way to get N2 to react, patent it, and you could become the richest person in history.


ETA: cf n2doc's "no 'almost certainly'" remark in the OP. With a name like n2doc, I suppose he could be an expert on N2.

TxDemChem

(1,918 posts)
14. I know!
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 03:07 PM
Jun 2013

My main concern was with the impurities that may be present in the canister they got the liquid nitrogen from, not so mich the N2 itself. I'm guessing they may have gotten 99.9% or even 99.99% purity. And if they allowed any air into the tank when they opened it. No telling what environment they opened it in and what the pressure of the canister was before opening. Either way, you're right. Under everyday conditions, the N2 won't react.

formercia

(18,479 posts)
20. N2 will react.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:31 PM
Jun 2013

An experiment in Basic Chemistry is to burn some Magnesium in Air, leaving a white powder. One would assume it is Magnesium Oxide, but if you add a few drops of Water, the odor of Ammonia soon be comes apparent. The Magnesium burns at a high temperature which, Besides the Magnesium Oxide, forms Magnesium Nitride, which will react with water to form Ammonia.

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
21. Yes, yes ... with magnesium, with lithium. Not with anything found in a pool at room temp.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jun 2013

Actually, lots of reactive metals react with nitrogen, but they are all a bit "exotic" and usually produced only by electrolysis. Not a practical approach to N2 fixation.

Thermodynamically, the reaction of N2 and O2 is exothermic, but the barrier of activation is absurdly high. IC engines produce traces of NOx this way, but only traces.

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
13. Well, DUH ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inert_gas_asphyxiation
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jun 2013
Accidental deaths[edit]

Accidental nitrogen asphyxiation is a possible hazard where large quantities of nitrogen are used.

Accidental nitrogen asphyxiation causes about eight deaths per year in the United States,[12] which is asserted to be more than from any other industrial gas. For example in 1981, shortly before the launch of the first Space Shuttle mission, two technicians lost consciousness and one of them died after they entered the Orbiter aft compartment which was pressurized with pure nitrogen as a precaution against fire.[13]

A laboratory assistant died in Scotland in 1999, apparently from asphyxiation, after liquid nitrogen spilled in a basement storage room.[14]

Occasional deaths are reported from recreational death from inhaling helium, but these are very rare from direct inhalation from small balloons. Entering large helium balloons has been fatal.[15] Accidental falls have been fatal after a person inhaled from a balloon, and lost consciousness. Lung rupture and fatal gas embolism has occurred from inhaling from a pressure tank, and although this is reported as helium inhalation death, it is a different process from inert gas asphyxiation.[16].



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inert_gas_asphyxiation



http://www.csb.gov/board-releases-safety-bulletin-on-nitrogen-asphyxiation-hazards-underscores-need-for-good-safety-practices/



In this case, the N2 was cold, thus denser than warmer air, and so accumulated in the pool instead of escaping.

Iterate

(3,020 posts)
17. 1986: 1700 dead at Lake Lyos, Cameroon
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jun 2013

In that case the initial reports also blamed toxic gases, largely because those who survived the gas escape from the volcanic lake were on slightly higher ground and were only exposed to the lighter, irritating gases such as hydrogen sulfide. The real killer was the heavier CO2 that flowed close to the ground.

In 2011, a woman was killed in a McDonald's restroom in Georgia from CO2 that had leaked from a soda machine.

CO2 is also used to kill chickens before slaughter. There is some controversy over the use of CO2 in fire suppression systems because of its lethal and narcotic effects on those trying to escape a fire.

As with the N2 in this incident, it is referred to as "inert gas asphyxiation" even though CO2 is not technically inert. In either case there is no struggle and no warning.

The promoters who pulled this stunt might barely be excused for not knowing about inert gas asphyxiation, but certainly not the reporters who should at least have been aware of past events and some high school chemistry.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
18. unsurprisingly this has made it to the "Cool" classification
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 06:13 AM
Jun 2013

on the front page.

Obvious really -195 degrees C

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Why Having A Liquid Nitro...