Science
Related: About this forumUT chemists turn seawater into fresh water with a battery
Chemists at The University of Texas at Austin and the University of Marburg in Germany are on the verge of a breakthrough in the worldwide quest for potable water.
The new method requires so little energy, in fact, that it can run on a store-bought battery.
By creating a small electrical field that removes salts from seawater, the chemists have found a new method for the desalination of seawater that consumes less energy and is dramatically simpler than conventional techniques, according to a press release from UT-Austin.
The process avoids the problems confronting current desalination methods by separating salt from water at a microscale.
More at http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/UT-chemists-turn-seawater-into-fresh-water-with-a-4679663.php?cmpid=hpts .
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)We are on the verge of destroying our water supply here and have on other continents.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)But this is an excellent start.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Silly question...
quakerboy
(13,918 posts)And other prepackaged food items.
mc51tc
(219 posts)UT research is some of the best. I hope this turns into something big for affordable desalination in the near future.
As Walter Cronkite said: "What starts at the University of Texas, changes the world" - very true if this research pans out for sure.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)For a salt and battery!
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)just in case they come back
R0ckyRac00n
(84 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,515 posts)Lugal Zaggesi
(366 posts)Here's a nicer writeup of this development in the University of Texas at Austin's own "Texas Science News":
http://web5.cns.utexas.edu/news/2013/06/desalting-the-ocean/
Thursday, June 27th, 2013
It's a nice start, but they have a few hurdles left:
Thus far Crooks and his colleagues have achieved 25 percent desalination. Although drinking water requires 99 percent desalination, they are confident that goal can be achieved.
OK, maybe they can put these chips in series, desalinate the desalinated water...
The other major challenge is to scale up the process. Right now the microchannels, about the size of a human hair, produce about 40 nanoliters of desalted water per minute. To make this technique practical for individual or communal use, a device would have to produce liters of water per day. The authors are confident that this can be achieved as well.
At least the authors are confident...
40 nanoliters of 25% desalinated water per minute.
Let's assume they get it working to 99% desalination. This was a proof of principle, said Knust. Weve made comparable performance improvements while developing other applications based on the formation of an ion depletion zone. That suggests that 99 percent desalination is not beyond our reach. OK, let's say that's doable - and doesn't slow down the process too much.
Now, the speed - there are 1440 minutes per day.
"nanoliter" is 1 billionth of a liter.
A billion of these 'water chips' could do 40 liters per minute, or 57,600 liters per day.
Divide by 1000 - a million of these chips could give 57.6 liters per day.
Let's say 100,000 chips - that would give 5.76 liters/day. About 1.5 gallons of water.
That's still a lot of store-bought batteries.
If they could make each chip desalinate 99%, and 10 times faster, that's still 10,000 chips needed working 24 hours to produce 5.76 liters of potable water. How much power ? How long before the chips clog or degrade ? Did going from 25% to 99% desalination make the chips slower, not faster ? How reliable is the tubing taking seawater (already de-sedimented) into thousands of tiny human-hair-width microchannels ?
Most current methods for desalinating water rely on expensive and easily contaminated membranes. The membrane-free method weve developed still needs to be refined and scaled up, but if we can succeed at that, then one day it might be possible to provide fresh water on a massive scale using a simple, even portable, system.
True - I like that the approach involves no vaporization/condensation or membranes.
still needs to be refined and scaled up - yes, and let's hope it is still affordable when it is.
Good luck.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)That and the prohibitive cost of scaling up have especially plagued every desalination effort I've heard of.
And while I will continue to hope for success with each new method discovered, I recall previous efforts that withered into obscurity, some never to be heard of again.
gristy
(10,667 posts)I was pretty sure this was not what the headline implied it was.
Lugal Zaggesi
(366 posts)like the Ogallala Aquifer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer
In the United States, the biggest users of water from aquifers include agricultural irrigation and oil and coal extraction.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...as an investment by unscrupulous snakes in the commodity exchanges who are betting on future shortages of fresh water in lakes, rivers and aquifers. This is being done internationally where conceivably the people would lose the right of ownership and use of resources in their own countries, without the permission of the likes of T. Boone Pickens say, or even worse Citibank.
In any event, technology will always trump in the demand/supply scarcity game that is played. Which is why the monopolies want to control and own new technology to protect their positions in the old one. Like the oil companies.
[center]THE NEW OIL
[/center]
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)if only to bring ruin on those who have sought power and control through the purchasing of water rights.