Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 3183 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (51)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VIDEO: A camera on a toy car drives into a pride of lions. (Original Post)
Coyotl
Nov 2013
OP
Whoa! That's about a $3,000 camera (body only--NO Lens). I would have thought...
BlueJazz
Nov 2013
#10
While this is cool, I'm really surprised they used a time-elapse camera instead
Javaman
Nov 2013
#11
They used the highest resolution digital camera available = best photos possible
Coyotl
Nov 2013
#13
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)1. kitties
BIG kitties
sakabatou
(42,083 posts)2. Cool!
Merlot
(9,696 posts)3. This was Amazing! Loved it when the big cat picked up the "toy" and ran away
I wish they would have shown more of the footage.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)4. I know I shouldn't be surprised, but
I always have to laugh when you see these big cats have almost exactly the same behaviors as the little kitties.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)5. I'm surprised this wasn't done sooner.
Coming up next, a little submarine to go check out the fish?
ChazInAz
(2,535 posts)6. Anyone else notice?
The lioness on the left had a cataract in her right eye.
LittleGirl
(8,261 posts)7. now that you mention it...yes! eom
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)8. k&r thanks for posting. nm
7962
(11,841 posts)9. very interesting! wish they wouldve shown more!
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)10. Whoa! That's about a $3,000 camera (body only--NO Lens). I would have thought...
...a less expensive camera would have been just fine. Great photos !
Javaman
(62,442 posts)11. While this is cool, I'm really surprised they used a time-elapse camera instead
of a Go-Cam.
Odd.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)13. They used the highest resolution digital camera available = best photos possible
Javaman
(62,442 posts)14. Thanks for the info. nt
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)12. Awesome find, KnR & Shared, my Mom loved the video.