Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 04:48 PM Sep 2014

Asteroids: between a rock and a hard place

In February 2013, a large asteroid ripped over the Chelyabinsk district of Russia, trailing cartoonish lines of smoke as it made its shallow entry, radiating so much light and heat that onlookers were left with reddened faces. Skin peel. When the asteroid exploded, 15 miles up, there was a terrible, prolonged bang – a noise that has rung on, in its way, ever since.


We now know that the explosion over Chelyabinsk occurred with a force equal to 500 kilotons of TNT, or a couple of dozen Nagasaki bombs


snip
a Nasa scientist called Bill Cooke said the likely frequency of such meteor strikes was being re-evaluated. That month, a trio of studies published in the journals Nature and Science suggested impacts of Chelyabinsk's magnitude were between three and 10 times more likely to happen than previously supposed.

snip
Chelyabinsk in 2013. Sudan in 2008. Impacts over Indonesia, Egypt, Australia, Argentina, California and Finland; four in the north Pacific and three in the south, two in the south Atlantic and one in the north, four in the Indian Ocean, one in the Med, one in the Arabian Sea, one in the Tasman and one off Antarctica. Call them what you like – "city‑killers" or "pesky ones" – there have been 26 meteorite strikes since the turn of the century that were large enough to cause a kiloton-class pop.

Lu believes we should be worried by that.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/20/asteroids-rock-hard-place-meteor-strike-russia-nicaragua

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Asteroids: between a rock and a hard place (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Sep 2014 OP
There's no doubt we should be worried friendly_iconoclast Sep 2014 #1
A good read. R&K nt longship Sep 2014 #2
Quoting my project lead... Xipe Totec Sep 2014 #3
Ignorance is bliss. nilesobek Sep 2014 #4
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
1. There's no doubt we should be worried
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 05:12 PM
Sep 2014
http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/index.html

The Earth Impact Database (EID) comprises a list of confirmed impact structures from around the world. To date, there are 184 confirmed impact structures in the database. The database was conceived in its earliest form when a systematic search for impact craters was initiated in 1955 by the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, under the direction of Dr. Carlyle S. Beals.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
3. Quoting my project lead...
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 06:21 PM
Sep 2014

Back when I was working in the space program:

If you're not worried, you obviously don't understand the problem.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
4. Ignorance is bliss.
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 11:26 PM
Sep 2014

Our solar system was likely formed by colliding matter, billions of times. The larger bodies usually absorbs the smaller bodies which does not bode well for Earth and its captured satellite, the Moon.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Asteroids: between a rock...