Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:15 PM Jan 2015

Why A Fake Article Titled “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?” Was Accepted By 17 Medical Journals


As a medical researcher at Harvard, Mark Shrime gets a very special kind of spam in his inbox: every day, he receives at least one request from an open-access medical journal promising to publish his research if he would only pay $500.

"You block one of them with your spam filter and immediately another one pops up," Shrime, an MD who is pursuing a PhD in health policy, tells me.

These emails are annoying, for sure, but Shrime was worried that there might be bigger issues at stake: What exactly are these journals publishing and who is taking these journals to be credible sources of medical information?

Shrime decided to see how easy it would be to publish an article. So he made one up. Like, he literally made one up. He did it using www.randomtextgenerator.com. The article is entitled "Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?" and its authors are the venerable Pinkerton A. LeBrain and Orson Welles. The subtitle reads: "The surgical and neoplastic role of cacao extract in breakfast cereals." Shrime submitted it to 37 journals over two weeks and, so far, 17 of them have accepted it. (They have not "published" it, but say they will as soon as Shrime pays the $500. This is often referred to as a "processing fee." Shrime has no plans to pay them.) Several have already typeset it and given him reviews, as you can see at the end of this article. One publication says his methods are "novel and innovative"!. But when Shrime looked up the physical locations of these publications, he discovered that many had very suspicious addresses; one was actually inside a strip club.

more
http://www.fastcompany.com/3041493/body-week/why-a-fake-article-cuckoo-for-cocoa-puffs-was-accepted-by-17-medical-journals
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why A Fake Article Titled “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?” Was Accepted By 17 Medical Journals (Original Post) n2doc Jan 2015 OP
I don't care for that link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2015 #1
Didn't notice that on my browser n2doc Jan 2015 #2
17 or 37 journals? that's a who's who of pay-to-play resume-fluffing scams. unblock Jan 2015 #3
Here's an incomplete list of fraudulent scientific journals: DetlefK Jan 2015 #4
"Pinkerton A. LeBrain" Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #5

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. I don't care for that link.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:19 PM
Jan 2015

It tried twice to open a pdf file when I clicked through onto it. I really don't like websites that try to automatically do things other than simply display the page unless I ask them to.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. Didn't notice that on my browser
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:21 PM
Jan 2015

I think the pdf is a pdf of the science article discussed by the page. It is in an embedded window on my browser (Safari).

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
4. Here's an incomplete list of fraudulent scientific journals:
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 07:45 AM
Jan 2015
http://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/

If a journal asks YOU to do the text-formatting, then it's fake. A real journal has editors for that.






And one more thing:
?w=450
http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/20/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-laced-anti-spam-paper/
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Why A Fake Article Titled...