NASA, Boeing, SpaceX Outline Objectives to Station Flights

[friendly_iconoclast]

(Note: Copyright provisions do not apply as this is a U.S. Government product)

http://www.nasa.gov/content/nasa-boeing-spacex-outline-objectives-to-station-flights/#.VMeJZ1omV5m

By Steven Siceloff,
NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Fla.

American spacecraft systems testing followed by increasingly complex flight tests and ultimately astronauts flying orbital flights will pave the way to operational missions during the next few years to the International Space Station. Those were the plans laid out Monday by NASA's Commercial Crew Program officials and partners as they focus on developing safe, reliable and cost-effective spacecraft and systems that will take astronauts to the station from American launch complexes.

According to Boeing, the company’s schedule calls for a pad abort test in February 2017, followed by an uncrewed flight test in April 2017, then a flight with a Boeing test pilot and a NASA astronaut in July 2017.

SpaceX said they anticipate a pad abort test in about a month, then an in-flight abort test later this year as part of its previous development phase. An uncrewed flight test is planned for late 2016 and a crewed flight test in early 2017.

Speaking for the first time together since the awarding of the final development and certification contracts, officials from NASA's Commercial Crew Program, Boeing and SpaceX revealed some of the details of their plans to cross the chasm from spacecraft and launch system design to flight tests, certification and operational missions to the station.

"It’s an incredible testament to American ingenuity and know-how, and an extraordinary validation of the vision we laid out just a few years ago as we prepared for the long-planned retirement of the space shuttle," said Charlie Bolden, NASA administrator, during the briefing at the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. "This work is part of a vital strategy to equip our nation with the technologies for the future and inspire a new generation of explorers to take the next giant leap for America."

Boeing and SpaceX were selected in September 2014 to finalize their respective CST-100 and Crew Dragon spacecraft along with the rockets that will lift them into orbit and all of the ground and mission operations networks essential for safe flights. Both companies have worked with NASA’s Commercial Crew Program throughout multiple development phases, continuing to advance their designs before being chosen to complete their systems, reach certification and then fly astronauts to the station.

The goal of NASA's effort is to provide an American launch vehicle and spacecraft capable of safely carrying astronauts to the station. Unlike other NASA spacecraft, though, this new generation of human-rated vehicles will be designed, built, operated and owned by the companies themselves, not NASA. NASA will buy space transportation services from the companies for astronauts and powered cargo. It will be an arrangement like the one the agency uses already with the Commercial Resupply Services initiative that uses privately developed and operated rockets and spacecraft to deliver critical cargo to the station.

"There are launch pads out there already being upgraded and there is hardware already being delivered," said Kathy Lueders, manager of the Kennedy Space Center-based Commercial Crew Program. "Both companies have already accomplished their first milestones."

The new spacecraft will allow the station's crew to expand to seven astronauts and cosmonauts, which means twice as much time for research aboard the one-of-a-kind scientific platform – 80 hours a week instead of the current 40. Also, the handoff of flight to low-Earth orbit will permit NASA to pursue the challenges of deep space exploration and the journey to Mars with the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft.

Boeing and SpaceX each proposed a set of objectives and milestones that suits their development, testing and flight plans. NASA's role is to evaluate progress and make sure it meets stringent safety requirements, including a safe launch abort system built in to provide astronauts a means of escaping a potentially catastrophic situation. The agency placed a premium on giving providers the freedom to come up with innovations in design, manufacturing and testing.

Ultimately, NASA expects to have two separate spacecraft and launch systems it can turn to for flights of crew to the station and low-Earth orbit. The companies also can provide space transportation services to private citizens, companies and institutions in what could become a new industry for the American aerospace sector. The STS-135 mission, the final flight of the space shuttle, delivered an American flag to the station as a prize for the first Commercial Crew astronauts to visit the orbiting laboratory. A second flag will be taken to the station and brought back as a symbol of success as well.

"When we have both of these flags on the ground with their crews safely returned, we'll all be winners," Lueders said.

Boeing and SpaceX anticipate using facilities at Kennedy and the adjacent Cape Canaveral Air Force Station for aspects of processing and launch.

Boeing's CST-100 program will be based at Kennedy with the spacecraft being assembled inside one of the hangars formerly used to process space shuttles. Riding atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket, the CST-100 will launch from Cape Canaveral’s Space Launch Complex 41. A tower designed for the needs of astronauts and support staff is already under construction at SLC-41.

The work comes at a time when NASA is marking significant progress in a number of areas. For instance, the space station has housed crew members for 14 straight years and a NASA astronaut and Russian cosmonaut are getting ready for a yearlong residency there. There also is a NASA spacecraft already in development to carry astronauts on deep space missions along with a massive new rocket for it in manufacturing. Not to mention the New Horizons probe closing in on Pluto.

"Never before in the history of human spaceflight has there been so much going on all at once," said John Elbon, vice president and general manager of Boeing's Space Exploration division. "NASA's exploring places we didn't even know existed 100 years ago."

SpaceX leased Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy and will build a facility at the base of the pad that will be used for processing its Falcon 9 rockets and Crew Dragon spacecraft for launch. The company launches cargo-carrying Dragons and other uncrewed spacecraft from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral.

"We understand the incredible responsibility we've been given to carry crew," said Gwynne Shotwell, president of SpaceX.

Speaking in front of the agency's astronaut corps, the panelists offered an appealing vision of space travel including long-term spaceflight research and deep space missions.

"It's a great time to be a part of the American space program, which is on its way to Mars," said astronaut Mike Finke, who commanded the International Space Station and flew aboard the space shuttle. "There's not another group on this planet, or off this planet, that wants the success of the Commercial Crew Program more than we do."

The flights to the station are vital to NASA's goals, Bolden reiterated, and as the agency sets its eyes firmly on the Red Planet.

"It takes a lot of stuff to get off this planet and a whole lot more to get to Mars," Bolden said. "But that is the ultimate destination."

[Warren DeMontague]

1. When is the last time we put a human being on top of an Atlas rocket?

Gordo Cooper in '63, I think.

[friendly_iconoclast]

2. True- but Atlas rockets *work*, which is why they're still in use

They're like the Chevrolet OHV V-8 of launch vehicles...

[Warren DeMontague]

3. Oh, Im not saying it's a bad idea.

I just find it interesting from a historical perspective. Presumably the Spacex/dragon flights will fly on the Falcon.

[MannyGoldstein]

4. They must be way more powerful than the Atlases of yore?

The Boeing capsule probably weighs multiples of Mercury.

[Warren DeMontague]

8. I'm not a rocket scientist, even metaphorically, Manny. I am, however, a big ol' space nerd.

Looking at the evolution of the family of the thing, I'd say that the portion that looks to have remained mostly the same is just the central core, probably mostly just the fuel tanks, etc- although as others have noted it is now using 2 Russian Engines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_%28rocket_family%29



Mercury-Atlas:



The Atlas V:



A depiction of the Atlas V paired with the Boeing CST: (in these depictions the Atlas does not have the side SRBs it is shown with in the upper configuration)



In terms of aesthetics, I have to vote for the Falcon-Dragon combo. The Atlas with the CST sort of looks like some kind of giant knobby vibrator.

[gordianot]

5. Yes and the Atlas V uses a Russian RD-180 rocket engine.

[friendly_iconoclast]

6. About that: "U.S. Defense Department Balks at RD-180 Replacement Program"

http://spacenews.com/42537us-defense-department-balks-at-rd-180-replacement-program/

http://spacenews.com/ula-could-buy-as-many-as-30-more-russian-made-rd-180-engines/

In any event, there won't be any Russian-made RD-180 available after 2019

[gordianot]

7. How's that for irony?

The Soviet Union impounded a B-29 during WW-2 and copied reverse engineered it down to every nut and bolt. It became the basis for development in airframe for subsequent Soviet Intercontinental bombers. The early lead the Soviets had during the Cold War was rocket engines. Would be willing to bet an American replacement looks a lot like what is being used now. Back in the day when Republicans still believed in science even Reagan had to heed the warning of American and Soviet Scientists that nuclear war was not winnable. So space exploration was a logical use for what was originally designed for mass destruction. Guess it takes a new Cold War and arrogance to loose your perspective.

[friendly_iconoclast]

9. ULA was too cheap to buy a license to build RD-180s when US/RU relations were better

Instead, they chose the outsourcing route. Now it's biting them in the ass