The dark future of American space exploration

[n2doc]

One by one they flickered to life. Venus, first, in 1962, and two and a half years later, Mars. Our spacecraft flew by those planets, orbited them, and became manmade meteors streaking toward the first soil we couldn’t generically call "earth." Later, when we grew ambitious and confident in our abilities, humanity reached for the outer planets, probing Jupiter and Saturn in 1973 and 1979. Each mission turned conjecture into fact, invalidated old assumptions, and brought us closer to one day answering the two fundamental questions of existence: where did all this come from, and where is it headed?

Mission successes don't happen in a void. For every newly lighted world there are crashed probes, lost spacecraft, and rockets destroyed on launch pads. The exploration of other worlds is a cumulative art, and with a steady cadence of missions comes an institutional knowledge for scientists and engineers. Every setback is its own library of insights. In 1964, when probe Mariner 3 missed Mars, its target, due to equipment failure, Mariner 4 was three weeks behind, and succeeded where its twin had failed.

The cadence cannot be interrupted, which is why many planetary scientists now eye warily their calendars. America's starvation budget for planetary exploration has stopped good missions from going forward, and keeps new missions from reaching the launch pad. One by one over the next three years, as missions end and spacecraft die, the outer planets will again go dark.

If NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto is extended beyond 2017, the entire active human presence at the outer planets will consist of a single probe the size of a grand piano. If the mission is not extended, humanity's 43-year exploration of the outer planets will end, and humanity's horizon will shrink by about 2.5 billion miles. Worse, because of the time necessary to build a spacecraft and the harsh reality of orbital mechanics, the earliest a new mission could be sent beyond the asteroid belt is sometime in the 2020s.

more

http://www.vox.com/2015/2/23/8052365/nasa-budget-europa

[hollysmom]

1. I thought this would be about the no-return policy of the new Mars exploration.

Humankind on Mars

[n2doc]

2. which is a scam

http://www.buzzfeed.com/danvergano/mars-aint-never-gonna-happen

[hollysmom]

3. never is a long time

sure it won't happen soon, but are they selling tickets or something, it may be a foolish dream but is it a scam?

[n2doc]

4. Doesn't have to be never

Just more than the decade that these folks who are signing up expected to wait. Since there are clear, extremely expensive and deadly issues to deal with, that aren't being dealt with, it is a scam.

[krispos42]

5. The wasted money in Iraq... $3,000,000,000,000

That could have funded NASA for a century and a half.

[LongTomH]

6. At least ESA, Japan, China and India will keep exploring!

A couple of decades ago, I would have thought you were crazy if you said that, India is likely to pull ahead of us in space exploration; now it seems almost inevitable.

I would have expected this kind of short-sightedness from a Republican White House; I'm dismayed to see it coming from a Democratic one.