American scientists in the 1920s actually wanted to conduct this horrifying, racist study

[Judi Lynn]

American scientists in the 1920s actually wanted to conduct this horrifying, racist study
The Conversation
23 Feb 2015 at 13:57 ET

In the late 1920s, scientists hatched an outrageous plan to settle a question at the heart of American racial thought: were differences between racial groups driven by environment or by heredity? In other words, was the racist social order of the time – white over black — an inevitable and genetically driven outcome? Or did the environment in which all Americans lived create the deep disparities and discord between races that defined the social, economic and political reality of the United States?

A committee on “Racial Problems,” jointly sponsored by the venerable National Research Council and the Social Science Research Council, discussed an experiment: create racial orphanages, separate institutions where children of different races would be received as close to birth as possible. The idea was to compare white and black children under similar conditions. Scientists could closely monitor the institutionalized children as they developed to figure out whether differences were due to innate characteristics or environmental influence. Nursery schools and foster homes were proposed as places of comparative study too, but most of committee’s discussions focused on the idea of racial orphanages.



Morton and contemporaries believed differences in skull size among races explained variance in
intelligence. Here scientists fill skulls with water to measure capacity. Morton filled them with lead shot.
Washington Matthews

Science has made claims about race in America since the late 18th century, when Thomas Jefferson hypothesized that the differences between races are “fixed in nature.” In the 19th century, anthropologists such as Samuel Morton argued for a racial hierarchy of intelligence and believed human races evolved from separate origins. Eugenicists tried to quantify the hereditary nature of race difference in the early 20th century, using their science to develop social policy, including forced sterilization and anti-immigration laws. Racism has indeed left its stain on scientific thought.

The committee on “Racial Problems” was no different. Its 1930 report alleged the racial orphanage experiment could “throw light” on how heredity and environment influenced health, vigor, intelligence and sociability. To do this, scientists would try to improve the condition of the black children in the study by altering environmental factors, including shielding the children from racism, offering improved nutrition, and providing better educational opportunities than they might otherwise have had.

More:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/american-scientists-in-the-1920s-actually-wanted-to-conduct-this-horrifying-racist-study/

[NickB79]

1. I have a feeling that even if the experiments were conducted

The results would have never been published, as they would have found no difference between the races.

And such knowledge would have been very infuriating to a large number of people at the time.

[hunter]

2. I can't see how it would be possible to remove social biases in such a study.

Racist researchers and workers would treat the black kids differently than the white kids, and their own reports on the children's "progress" would undoubtedly be biased in favor of white superiority.

These social "scientists" were quacks, racists, and eugenicists. Their "research" would have been bullshit.

In any case, most orphanages of the 1920's were pretty damned horrible, especially for black children.

[AverageJoe90]

3. "as they would have found no difference between the races." And that's if.....

the study was even conducted honestly; which would have been hard to do, as TPTB had ways of silencing research that contradicted their favored agitprop flavor of the times, which happened to be racial eugenics in the 1920s and 1930s.