Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

struggle4progress

(120,360 posts) Thu Apr 28, 2011, 02:41 PM Apr 2011

Hubble Telescope Discoveries Excite New Generation of Astrologers

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hubble Telescope Discoveries Excite New Generation of Astrologers (Original Post) struggle4progress Apr 2011 OP

This thread needs photos! 1monster May 2011 #1

Astrologers? svpadgham Dec 2011 #2

I hope so Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #6

Are you really that bored? laconicsax Dec 2011 #3

This post is from April, when DU3 was first opened for testing struggle4progress Dec 2011 #4

Didn't notice that, sorry. laconicsax Dec 2011 #5

1monster

(11,026 posts)

1. This thread needs photos!

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Tue May 17, 2011, 04:03 PM

May 2011

svpadgham

(670 posts)

2. Astrologers?

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 11:49 AM

Dec 2011

Don't you mean astronomers?

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)

6. I hope so

Reply to svpadgham (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 04:44 PM

Dec 2011

Would be pretty F$@ked up if he didn't

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

3. Are you really that bored?

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 11:54 AM

Dec 2011

struggle4progress

(120,360 posts)

4. This post is from April, when DU3 was first opened for testing

Reply to laconicsax (Reply #3)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:01 PM

Dec 2011

I made a number of quick posts back then in various forums to test the software

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

5. Didn't notice that, sorry.

Reply to struggle4progress (Reply #4)

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:03 PM

Dec 2011

Reply to this discussion