Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:30 AM Jul 2015

NTSB: Co-pilot of spaceship unlocked braking system early

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal safety investigators said Tuesday the crash of a Virgin Galactic spaceship last year was caused by a catastrophic structural failure triggered when the co-pilot unlocked the craft's braking system early.

National Transportation Safety Board investigators said the resulting aerodynamic forces caused the brakes to actually be applied without any further action by the crew. Investigators said no safeguards were built into system to overcome the error of the co-pilot.

The spaceship broke apart over the Mojave Desert during a test flight 10 months ago. The accident killed the co-pilot and seriously injured the pilot.

NTSB officials said early in the investigation that the co-pilot prematurely unlocked equipment designed to slow the descent of the spacecraft during initial re-entry. Simply unlocking the spacecraft's brakes shouldn't have applied them, but investigators had said that might have happened anyway and the resulting stress may have contributed to the spacecraft's destruction.

more
http://www.sfgate.com/business/technology/article/Federal-officials-examine-probable-cause-of-6409137.php

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NTSB: Co-pilot of spaceship unlocked braking system early (Original Post) n2doc Jul 2015 OP
Why were no safeguard built-in? procon Jul 2015 #1
Software error...the copilot unlocked the brakes in preparation and the computer deployed them... haikugal Jul 2015 #2

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. Why were no safeguard built-in?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:46 AM
Jul 2015

Was it a madman, devil may care, roll the dice and take your chances on a shoestring thrill ride, or did they deliberately eliminate the safeguard to cut costs and show potential investors they were a potential goldmine?

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
2. Software error...the copilot unlocked the brakes in preparation and the computer deployed them...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:59 AM
Jul 2015

This has been a very exciting program with innovative engineering. They've had a good safety record...we'll see what they find out but I for one am glad they're building another one.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»NTSB: Co-pilot of spacesh...