Science
Related: About this forumTrump's Pick for Budget Director Isn't Sure the Government Should Fund Scientific Research
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trumps-pick-budget-director-isnt-sure-government-should-fund-scientific-researchIf confirmed by the Senate to lead the Office of Management and Budget, Mulvaney, a deficit hawk who recently spoke before a chapter of the right-wing-fringe John Birch Society, would be in charge of crafting Trump's budget and overseeing the functioning of federal agencies. One thing he seems to believe the budget and the agencies should not be funding is research into diseases like the Zika virus.
Two weeks before Congress finally passed more than $1 billion to fight the spread of Zika and its effects, Mulvaney questioned whether the government should fund any scientific research. "[D]o we need government-funded research at all," he wrote in a Facebook post on September 9 unearthed by the Democratic opposition research group American Bridge. Mulvaney appears to have deleted his Facebook page since then.
If there wasn't a trend to Trump's cabinet picks I would be less worried, but all of them believe in regressive, anarcho-capitalist "the market will solve it" principles.
And we're screwed anyway: Trump already wants to scrap climate change research.
If Mulvaney guts funding, and you're an epidemiologist whose area of expertise is vaccines, and you don't depend on funding from pharmaceutical companies to avoid conflict of interest, you're screwed.
Our Government research agencies are the bedrock for R&D, gutting agencies will see us lose ground to China and Russia, and affect researchers or all stripes directly.
#GoodGoingAmerica
#YouDidIt
Turbineguy
(40,214 posts)would depopulate the country nicely.
Nice in the republican sense.
bluedigger
(17,450 posts)Turbineguy
(40,214 posts)It's not fair to Germans. They did not elect this guy.
OK, just this once: Eindmarktlossung.
bluedigger
(17,450 posts)Give credit where credit is due, I say.
JHan
(10,173 posts)Defense Funding.
Because our military industrial complex isn't YUUUUUGGGGEEE enough..
Girard442
(6,919 posts)...is to die atop a giant heap of money, of a disease that could have been prevented if only the CDC had been able to research it.
zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)Someone ought to ask him which research programs over at DARPA he wants to defund, or those in the many labs that the DoD runs.
JHan
(10,173 posts)even if it breaks the budget.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.