Science
Related: About this forumI have some questions about "counterfeit" eclipse viewing glasses.
I have some eclipse viewing glasses that I got from Amazon over a month ago. I tried a pair when I got them and they seem to work just as they should. The sun is reduced to a clearly visible disk and I felt no sign of discomfort or eye strain looking directly at the sun on a clear afternoon.
Amazon just notified several of their customers, including me, that the glasses we got from them aren't properly certified, and they recommend that we not use them to view the sun. (See https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029453375)
Since the glasses don't appear to pass an uncomfortable amount of visible light, is the reason for this supposed danger that they might pass harmful radiation in the infrared or ultraviolet regions of the spectrum? If so, is it infrared, ultraviolet, or both?
If it's ultraviolet radiation, I had cataract surgery in both eyes and my lens implants are opaque to ultraviolet light. Can I expect that to help protect my retinas?
Thanks for any information.
freddyvh
(276 posts)After I purchased 5 glasses.
They had the "certified" stamp on them from the ISO
It makes me wonder if any of the glasses are trustworthy
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)https://eclipse.aas.org/eye-safety/iso-certification
Towlie
(5,324 posts)The glasses are either safe or not safe. The article first says this:
How do you know if your eclipse glasses or handheld solar viewers are truly safe? You need to know that they meet the ISO 12312-2 (sometimes written as ISO 12312-2:2015) international safety standard. Filters that are ISO 12312-2 compliant not only reduce visible sunlight to safe and comfortable levels but also block solar UV and IR radiation.
Unfortunately, you can't check whether a filter meets the ISO standard yourself doing so requires a specialized and expensive piece of laboratory equipment...
Then later it says what you quoted above:
How can you tell if your solar viewer is not safe? You shouldn't be able to see anything through a safe solar filter except the Sun itself or something comparably bright... (etc.)
This is a direct contradiction. First it says you need assurance that invisible wavelengths are blocked, then it says you can judge according to what's visible.
Nitram
(22,801 posts)is the most harmful frequency. Basically, the glasses might be ok but if they are not certified, there is no way of knowing, and not worth the risk. I got online to replace the glasses I got from Amazon (a month ago) as soon as I got their email, and almost every certified product already had a backorder time of two or more weeks. The person I got on the chat helpline finally located some children's size glasses which were certified and immediately available.
Jim__
(14,076 posts)It emphasizes the not in the question: How can you tell if your solar viewer is not safe?
My reading of that is: failing that test means your viewer is not safe, passing it does not guarantee that it is safe. If that is their intended meaning, they should clarify their statement.
Warpy
(111,257 posts)I've been blind once, don't want to be blind again.
I'd stick to the two pieces of cardboard, one with a pinhole, the other with a white surface to focus the image on.
Canoe52
(2,948 posts)They also say welding goggles will work, but I've done welding and you can't see much through them, even the sun.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,616 posts)Embedded in this article is a list of manufacturers who have been investigated and are deemed reliable. All the solar glasses I have are on this list.