Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(164,164 posts)
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 07:27 PM Mar 2019

Genetically engineered salmon OK'd for human consumption in U.S.

MARCH 14, 2019 / 4:00 AM

By Jessie Higgins

EVANSVILLE, Ind., March 14 (UPI) -- Genetically engineered salmon have become the first animal with a modified gene structure that can be sold for human consumption in the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration last week lifted an import ban on a line of genetically modified Atlantic salmon raised in Canada. The Massachusetts company that raises that fish, AquaBounty, announced its intention to import salmon eggs into the United States.

"We are delighted," CEO Sylvia Wulf said in a statement. "We will immediately start the process to import [our] eggs from our hatchery in Canada to begin grow out at our Indiana facility."

The FDA originally approved the sale of AquaBounty's genetically modified salmon in 2015. But Congress stopped the company from importing it while regulators created labeling guidelines for genetically modified food animals.

More:
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/03/14/Genetically-engineered-salmon-OKd-for-human-consumption-in-US/6121552486311/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Genetically engineered salmon OK'd for human consumption in U.S. (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2019 OP
Glad I don't like fish Red Mountain Mar 2019 #1
I am with you rurallib Mar 2019 #3
Not by me! cp Mar 2019 #2
I personally think two billion years would be more appropriate. NNadir Mar 2019 #4
Personally I lean more towards trusting in science and in this case the article says they only cstanleytech Mar 2019 #5

cp

(8,375 posts)
2. Not by me!
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 07:31 PM
Mar 2019

Prefer the European Precautionary Principle--make sure it's safe (and that may take decades) before unleashing it.

NNadir

(38,548 posts)
4. I personally think two billion years would be more appropriate.
Reply to cp (Reply #2)
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 08:38 PM
Mar 2019

I say this as a person with a modified genome. In fact, all of the genes in my body have been modified from those of my ancestors from a billion years ago.

I question whether I am safe.

cstanleytech

(28,596 posts)
5. Personally I lean more towards trusting in science and in this case the article says they only
Reply to cp (Reply #2)
Thu Mar 14, 2019, 09:27 PM
Mar 2019

changed some of the genes regarding the growth rate so that they reach maturity faster.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Genetically engineered sa...