Science
Related: About this forumNumberphile: '60'
The ancient Babylonians used a number system with base 60 (sexagesimal). Tablet image courtesy of Bill Casselman and Yale Babylonian Collection
Sixty is the smallest number divisible by the numbers 1 to 6. (There is no smaller number divisible by the numbers 1 to 5). 60 is the smallest number with exactly 12 divisors.
The Babylonian number system had a base of sixty, inherited from the Sumerian and Akkadian civilizations, and possibly motivated by the large number of divisors which 60 has. The sexagesimal measurement of time and of geometric angles is a legacy of the Babylonian system.
Blues Heron
(5,926 posts)ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)but not base 60 in the classic sense...
The marks he made were still base10...
sP
Orrex
(63,172 posts)Or 30 at least.
Or maybe 6.
Very interesting, all the same!
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)I have a system to count to 100 on two hands that I've been using for about seven years.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)laconicsax
(14,860 posts)And what's multiplication if not just fancy counting?
http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1914
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)smbc is great....
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Stupid Wikipedia telling me that repeated tetration is actually called pentation and repeated pentation is hexation.
daaron
(763 posts)What's a 6-shot espresso called?
A 'sex'! (Or a 'hex' - same thing).
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)I'm addicted to caffeine just like everyone else, but you have to draw the line somewhere...
marble falls
(57,013 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)daaron
(763 posts)60 is two times the product of the three smallest primes (2*3*5 = 30).
Whoooaaa... Heavy, man.
Dig it in binary:
1*(2^5) + 1*(2^4) + 1*(2^3) + 1*(2^2) + 0*(2^1) + 0*(2^0) = 32 + 16 + 8 + 4 = (111100) base2
What's a left bit shift? Oh yeah, multiplication by 2:
1111000 = (120) base10
Like wow, man: (2*2*2)*(3*3)*5 = (2^3)*(3^2)*(5^1) = 8*9*5 = 8*45 = 360.
It must mean something.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)"We are the music makers, we are the dreamers of dreams" -Willy Wonka.
In a long ago post I talked about set numbers, how any set of integers can be encoded in an integer, (sum(2^n for each n in set)). 60 is set number for {2,3,4,5} all the numbers up to six, excluding 1, 0. 10*6 = 60. So in this context I just made up, 60 is significant in that regard. But the real significant thing is that there are infinity of such systems where 60 is significant in its own way. Its all about what we put into it.
2+3+4+5 = 14, the fourteenth card of the Tarot:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperance_(Tarot_card)
In gematria, the significance of the number 60: (note 4th definition)
http://www.billheidrick.com/works/hgm1/hg0060.htm
daaron
(763 posts)Unfortunately, what that something is is utterly opaque.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)...42 is all we've got.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)I mean really literally, they divorced message meaning from the bits and bytes needed to transmit it, and that was it. The thought doing that is so second nature to us today, but it was conceptually tough back then. Meaning is just a map from the bits and bytes of our experiences to some other proverbial bits and byte in our heads, and that map is different for different people, and I don't just mean "yo" to a rapper and "yo" to a Spanish speaker, I mean different to everybody, in more subtle ways. We literally create meaning by creating that stimulus response map in our heads.
So what did I say? Oh yes, temperance. Um, wikipedia:
Some Jungians say that Temperance represents the unconscious, which can guide us, they contend, to a deeper understanding of ourselves. The one foot on the land, the other in the water, represents the unification of the external and internal, conscious and unconscious, realms.
Yes, know thyself, the unification of conscious and unconcious mind. That's what I'm talking about. My meaning was that meaning can be created, and generally is, but at a subconscious level where we don't see it, so we consider meaning to be an absolute an external phenomenon when it is actually a totally internal one, unique to ourselves. Yeah, that's what I meant. I wasn't just drunkenly babbling bullshit, I swear!
Honest.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)All lost to Europe during the dark ages. Reminds of of the tenuousness of knowledge, we would do well never to forget.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)and came up with a value of 3.125 or 25/8.
The ancient Babylonians generally calculated the area of a circle by taking 3 times the square of its radius (pi=3), but one Old Babylonian tablet (from ca. 1900-1680 BCE) indicates a value of 3.125 for pi.
http://ualr.edu/lasmoller/pi.html
A good book on the subject is Beckmann's History of Pi is terrific and includes the black hole of progress in pi (and most everything else) from the Roman Empire to the Renaissance in a chapter aptly called 'Night.'