Anthropology
Related: About this forumHow Do You Say ‘Disagreement’ in Pirahã?
In his 2008 memoir, Dont Sleep, There Are Snakes, the linguist Dan Everett recalled the night members of the Pirahã the isolated Amazonian hunter-gatherers he first visited as a Christian missionary in the late 1970s tried to kill him.
Dr. Everett survived, and his life among the Pirahã, a group of several hundred living in northwest Brazil, went on mostly peacefully as he established himself as a leading scholarly authority on the group and one of a handful of outsiders to master their difficult language.
His life among his fellow linguists, however, has been far less idyllic, and debate about his scholarship is poised to boil over anew, thanks to his ambitious new book, Language: The Cultural Tool, and a forthcoming television documentary that presents an admiring view of his research among the Pirahã along with a darkly conspiratorial view of some of his critics.
In 2005 Dr. Everett shot to international prominence with a paper claiming that he had identified some peculiar features of the Pirahã language that challenged Noam Chomskys influential theory, first proposed in the 1950s, that human language is governed by universal grammar, a genetically determined capacity that imposes the same fundamental shape on all the worlds tongues.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/22/books/a-new-book-and-film-about-rare-amazonian-language.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120322
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Chomsky's "Universal Grammar" has always stunk like BS to me.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)this makes me very sceptical of his academic abilities.
Judi Lynn
(160,649 posts)groovedaddy
(6,229 posts)to reject his religion. He found out that they had far more to teach him than what he was trying to foist on them.