Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Neanderthals and Sapiens were separate species (Original Post) prodigitalson May 2021 OP
No, it just seems like some of their political offspring act like mules. marble falls May 2021 #1
I don't know why I never thought to ask the question 70sEraVet May 2021 #2
Not necessarily. Dogs, coyotes, and wolves interbreed with enthusiasm Glorfindel May 2021 #3
Gonna read that tonight. Aren't dogs, coyotes and wolves prodigitalson May 2021 #5
Ligers, and Tigons and ??!??!!! Oh, my! ; ) electric_blue68 Jun 2021 #12
The concept of "species" is fuzzy Random Boomer May 2021 #4
Homo sapiens did not branch off from Neanderthals. PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2021 #11
Separate species can produce viable offspring Warpy May 2021 #6
So usually the offspring is sterile but not always? prodigitalson Jun 2021 #7
Female offspring are sometimes fertile Warpy Jun 2021 #8
Thanks for the info prodigitalson Jun 2021 #9
Very rarely but it has happened. NT Warpy Jun 2021 #10

70sEraVet

(3,496 posts)
2. I don't know why I never thought to ask the question
Wed May 19, 2021, 09:13 AM
May 2021

I guess that the scientific breakthroughs of DNA analysis are much swifter than the derailments of old ideas.
Apparently, the scientific community is wrestling with the same question.
I had trouble copying this link.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-neandertal-brethren/

Glorfindel

(9,729 posts)
3. Not necessarily. Dogs, coyotes, and wolves interbreed with enthusiasm
Wed May 19, 2021, 09:45 AM
May 2021

and their offspring are fertile. Wolf-dogs, coydogs, and coywolves are real things, and living among us. The coywolves, especially, are thriving. Here's an article:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/coywolves-are-taking-over-eastern-north-america-180957141/

Random Boomer

(4,168 posts)
4. The concept of "species" is fuzzy
Wed May 19, 2021, 02:42 PM
May 2021

Humans have created this abstract concept of species, and it is a generally useful idea, but the details of what separates similar animals into two separate species are less precise than many people realize.

Homo sapiens has only existed for about 300,000 years and our branching off from Neanderthals and Denisovans hominoids is recent enough that we could still breed and produce viable offspring. Whether we can even call ourselves separate species may have more to do with human pride than with scientific fact.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,853 posts)
11. Homo sapiens did not branch off from Neanderthals.
Tue Jun 8, 2021, 10:51 AM
Jun 2021

We had a common ancestor 300,000 to 700,000 years ago. So we are (were) more or less cousins.

We have learned an enormous amount about Neanderthals in recent years. I highly recommend Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death, and Art by Rebecca Wrag Sykes. She points out that most of what we know about them comes from bones and stones. Almost nothing else that they had or used or made has survived. But what we've been able to glean from bones and stones, as well as some DNA testing, is remarkable.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
6. Separate species can produce viable offspring
Mon May 31, 2021, 01:34 PM
May 2021

but usually the first generation males are sterile. The examples are horse-donkey producing mules, offspring between lions and tigers.

We did share a vast amount of DNA with them, I think around 95%. Better facial reconstructions have shown they might be stared at on a subway, but they really weren't all that different from us. The lifestyles at the time were quite similar and likely technology was shared along with DNA.

Bottom line is that they were human, they were people, and we didn't always pick fights with them.

prodigitalson

(2,419 posts)
7. So usually the offspring is sterile but not always?
Tue Jun 1, 2021, 01:49 PM
Jun 2021

So would it be safe to say there were enough differences to classify them as separate (human) species, but ones that were more genetically similar than a tiger and a lion or a donkey and a horse?

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
8. Female offspring are sometimes fertile
Tue Jun 1, 2021, 02:16 PM
Jun 2021

which is how we get things like designer wild/domestic cat hybrids. The fertility rate isn't 100% for females, which is why we have such a low percentage of Neandertal DNA in modern humans outside Africa. The farther apart the species are, the lower the female fertility rate.

We were very close to Neandertals, about 95%. Fertility among female hybrids was likely common, while males shot blanks. Some studies have suggested an early disappearance of the Neandertal Y chromosome fairly soon after contact, but that hasn't been conclusively proven. Studies have also suggested Neandertal populations had declined to a point inbreeding was beoming a problem by the time we left Africa, but that hasn't been conclusively proven. All we know for sure is that part of that species lives on in us, that we didn't simply see them and slaughter them like people thought we did 50 years ago.

(I'd love to see a friendly domestic cat with the Pallas cat coat and range of facial expressions, but alas, the divergence was too long ago and they're most likely incompatible)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»If Neanderthals and Sapie...