Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumIf an Atheist is judged
By the actions of a few (Christopher Hitchens, misinterpretation of Dawkins, etc) then why is is not OK for Christians to be judged by the actions of, say Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron (though there are multitudes to choose from).
Just a thought that came to me in the shower.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Before anyone ever heard of Dawkins or Hitchens...
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Besides that, it is easier to bully the minority than to pick fights with the majority.
It is a slow process to gain acceptable for a minority, so we have a long way to go.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)b/c i'm not feeling patient, again.
maybe i should meditate more. i find 'quiet mind' practice heps put things in perspective. like standing on a mountaintop or on the white cliffs of dover for a few minutes.
me 'n my big mouth.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)and less religion discussions. Or we should just get drunk.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)i'll raise my glass to all you heathens on this terrible friday.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)it being 'good' friday n'all.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)The false dilemma between Hitchens\Dawkins vs. Comfort\Cameron falls somewhere near last on my list .....
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I have seem many times "Well Dawkins said this, so I'm gonna assume all atheists are like it" and they then flip out when you say something like "Well, you claim you're a staunch catholic, so I'm gonna question your views on x" you're being bigoted.
I was thinking the specific Dawkins/Comfort duality because both are taken out of context, and neither represent all Atheists/Christians. Kinda pointing out how silly it would be for them to say "Well, I heard Dawkins said X so all atheists are assholes" (not quite an actual quote) Maybe if they got compared in an equally bizarre manner it would seep in.