Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

[cleanhippie]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=140029

[EvolveOrConvolve]

1. Yea, it's a pretty chicken-shit thing to do

He's essentially skirting the rules by posting in one group to complain about his block in another group. Normally I wouldn't even respond, but he has no fucking shame.

[cleanhippie]

3. It's the usual passive-aggressive bullshit.

And it's hilarious!

[Bryce Butler]

2. SMH

[Warren Stupidity]

4. How is that post remotely within the religion group SOP?

And as I alerted on it, I assume that the religion group hosts have decided to not lock it. So much for their strong defense of "we need hosts". No we don't, they are useless.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

5. I alerted on it as well

It's being discussed in the Hosts forum.

[Warren Stupidity]

9. There is an honest debate that that shit stirring meta op is within the SOP?

No really there isn't, that was a rhetorical question.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

13. Well, as much "debate" as can be had with three posts

One of which came from a non-host.

[Warren Stupidity]

15. My opinion that host for the religion group

are useless has been reinforced.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

17. Yep

If it's going to be a free-for-all, poo-flinging shitstorm of OT posts that are left by the hosts, there's no reason to have hosts.

I made my case, but obviously they shut me down 'cuz I'm one of them meanies from A&A.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

18. But, pinto is arguing for a lock

So there's that, at least.

[Warren Stupidity]

19. Sort of. He wants to lock it

in the interests of group harmony, with no suggestion that the op is off topic meta at all.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

20. Better than nothing

I guess...

[defacto7]

21. I noticed.

I made it very clear that it is a violation of SOP and meta shit stirring.

I'm not a host of religion though, but it couldn't be more clear that it's a violation. It's even spelled out in the host group OP.

Not a reasonable doubt about it.

[kdmorris]

6. Hey, he can go get himself his own group if he has a problem with ours.

Since my response to him when laconicsax was PPR'd was the only hide I have EVER gotten in DU2 or DU3.. I will keep my thoughts on him out of this post to avoid another hide.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

7. I've never had a hide, but if I ever do it will be because of him

And I'll also refrain from elaborating so I don't get my first.

[kdmorris]

14. I had him on ignore for a long time after laconicsax was PPR'd

But about a month ago I took everyone off of ignore (LOL all 3 of them). I figured things would have changed in the last year, while I've been basically MIA with the babies. Oh, well, I guess things never change.

[awoke_in_2003]

41. laconicsax was ppr'ed? nt

[LostOne4Ever]

42. I was not on DU when it happened but I think they are referring to this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12308733

[kdmorris]

44. Yep, that's the one. n/t

[kdmorris]

43. Yes, about 2 years ago :( n/t

[SecularMotion]

8. I think I hit a nerve.

[cleanhippie]

10. You bet your ass you did!

Well done. Few are more deserving of the walloping he is getting.

[LostOne4Ever]

11. I really think he needs to change his avatar

To a constipated bull...cause I know of no other way to be that full of bullshit!

To the jury: yes it was worth it!

[cleanhippie]

12. +1

[Curmudgeoness]

27. Yes, it was worth it!

There are few things worth it, but I love your comment.

[onager]

16. Wow. Somebody got their jimmies rustled.

But I fully support the idea of a shiny new atheist group.

As long as they call it "Inter-Atheist." Sure to be a rousing success, based on past experience.

[defacto7]

22. I like interfacts

[mr blur]

23. It's a pretty desperate move, though completely believable.

9 Recs from the usual suspects.

I think we should have a separate new Atheist Group but only for me so that nobody who dares to ̶ ̶a̶r̶g̶u̶e̶ discuss progressive theology with me is allowed to speak. And my wife agrees.

[cleanhippie]

24. Desperate? Perhaps. Petulant, idiotic, and self-absorbed? Completely.

[Warren Stupidity]

25. Well that was fun.

It only took over 24 hours and a bit of Host Shaming to get them to do their job.

[beam me up scottie]

26. Now what did I miss?

Having trouble getting on the internet lately grrrr.

[intaglio]

28. I thought it was pretty funny when he said

Groups are, by definition, formed by people who share common interests, ideas or beliefs

and then proceeded to ignore the first 2 elements and concentrate only on the belief side.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

29. And now certain people are complaining about this thread...

...in a Host Forum thread about the original Religion thread. The irony's thick enough to cut with a knife.

[cleanhippie]

30. I don't think irony is a word in their dictionary.

Neither is hypocrisy.

[AlbertCat]

31. I don't think irony is a word in their dictionary.

Oh GAWD!

Whatever you do don't bring the dictionary into this.... or anything!

[cleanhippie]

32. Lol! Shit, my bad. I forgot about that.

[Rob H.]

33. I'd like to formally withdraw any and all support

for having hosts in that group. I still think safe havens, such as this one, need them for reasons that should be obvious, but they appear to serve no useful purpose there.

And he and his supporters know damned well why he got blocked, and it wasn't because he was tolerant of religion. His gravedancing when laconicsax got PPRed would've been reason enough, but it was far from the only reason.

[Capt. Obvious]

35. Can someone explain what team bayer is?

Never mind - figured it out.

[rexcat]

36. Looks like someone else wants another AA group...

If AA doesn't speak for all atheists and agnostics then I say a new room should be started.

No Justin we don't need another AA group and some should keep their nose out of our business.

[JNelson6563]

37. Interesting to see who rec'd that shit.

Funny how some claim we should all get along and achieve mutual respect but then recommend a shit stirring post like that.

Julie

[trotsky]

38. Because, duh, it's not shit-stirring when they do it!

Silly!

[skepticscott]

39. No, according to some

shit-stirrers over there, there just giving as good as they get and calling things like they see them.

Of course, when they get a dose of the same, it's "bigotry".

[onager]

40. I see the spies have visited again...