The phantom menace of militant atheism

[mr blur]

My family went into central London last week. After they'd gone, I found myself checking the web for reports of bomb blasts. Absurd and paranoid of me, of course. Rationally, I know that a motorist is more likely to kill you than a terrorist. Ever since Iraq, I have also known that the intelligence services' "threats" can be imaginary. But I know this, too, and so does everyone else: if a bomb explodes, no one will think that a "militant atheist" has attacked his or her country. No one will mutter: "I wonder if someone has taken this god delusion argument too far." Or: "Atheists should have known that violent words lead to violent deeds."

The police don't send undercover agents into sceptic societies and parliament doesn't pass emergency laws to combat atheist violence. Fanatics threaten European Muslims if they abandon their faith but no atheist will attack them if they keep it. No one thinks that atheists threaten the lives of their fellow citizens anywhere in the west.

And yet across what passes for the intelligentsia, moral equivalence holds sway. There is militant religion on one side and militant atheism on the other. We've no obligation to make a choice between them. Indeed, we should devote our energies to attacking atheism rather than religion. You'd never guess it from the way believers and conventional intellectuals throw the term around, but "militant atheism" has a specific meaning. Marxist-Leninists, who persecuted all faiths whenever they assumed dictatorial power, were authentic militants. If you want to see militant atheism today, look at China, which sends supporters of Falun Gong to its black jails and bulldozes Catholic churches.

<snip>

An interesting piece which makes some points we'll all recognise.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/07/militant-atheism-religious-apologists-intellectuals

[Exultant Democracy]

1. Until atheist start blowing up things, or picketing funerals calling us militant is absurd.

Last edited Sun Sep 7, 2014, 02:15 PM - Edit history (1)

[Warpy]

2. Bullies hate to be called on their behavior

and will always claim to be the victim when they are.

[PoutrageFatigue]

3. ^^^This^^^

It happens on this very board...

[Curmudgeoness]

4. Excellent.

I am glad that you posted this here, but I do think that it deserves a post in Religion. This is nothing new to us, but there are people who maybe should think about this elsewhere.

[Cartoonist]

5. Indeed, we should devote our energies to attacking atheism rather than religion.

Wha? Religion is responsible for more death and oppression than atheism could ever hope for, and it doesn't.

The writer makes the mistake of calling Marxist-Leninists and the Chinese government militant atheists. Their policies were more politically based than religious based.

[Rainforestgoddess]

6. The author is giving an example of the general ideology

Not proposing an action.

[trotsky]

7. Both sides do it! They're the same! Dawkins is no different than a rabid fundamentalist!

Uh huh.

[AtheistCrusader]

8. That must be the origins of this comic.

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/extremists