Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forum"Starbucks Using Sodomites' Semen In Lattes"
Yep, that's the actual title of this little gem of a video I came across. Watch it and tell me that this guy isn't just OOZING christian love.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Starbucks Using Sodomites' Semen In Lattes" (Original Post)
EvolveOrConvolve
Nov 2014
OP
RussBLib
(10,464 posts)1. the article was a fake
...but, hey, a man of GAWD said it was true! So who you gonna believe!?! A man of GAWD!! or some silly site called a Snopes or Snoopes or whatever the devil calls it!!
Even the story the fool put up on the screen said the story was fake, but a man of GAWD would not DARE mislead anyone, would he? That's the DEVIL'S job!!
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)2. So bizarre.
I didn't get the cartoon posted earlier about this, but now I see where it started. Good Lord!
onager
(9,356 posts)3. One a them damn Canucks mighta started this...
Heather Mallick, Canadian journalist, describing her interview with Bill O'Reilly in 2004:
And then he asked me if I was a socialist, and I said, "Certainly," and it was as if I'd said I like donkey semen in my latte instead of milk...
It was like talking to a manic child who had eaten 800 cherry Pop Tarts for breakfast. He kept interrupting, so that no point could be made that could win a reply, much less a reasoned response not so much a gabble of sound bites as a howling from Bedlam.
It was like talking to a manic child who had eaten 800 cherry Pop Tarts for breakfast. He kept interrupting, so that no point could be made that could win a reply, much less a reasoned response not so much a gabble of sound bites as a howling from Bedlam.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1508779
(The original article in the Globe & Mail is long dead, but I found the article in an old DU thread.)