Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 04:24 PM Jan 2012

Would the world be better with or without Christianity?

Thought Experiment:

Let's just say we could convince every Christian that Christianity is untrue, a myth, and convince them not to practice it. Similar to a question Prof. Dawkins once asked Christopher Hitchens. But let's postulate for a moment that this could be achieved. Would it do any good? Would it do any harm? Or would it do nothing?

I opt for the latter. In reference to Dawkins' quote that "for good men to do evil, it takes religion," I argue lots of things can trigger a good man to do evil. Psychoses, hallucinations, fear, and the influence of drugs can make a person commit evil. And when I mention fear, I am not referring to Xenophobic fear, but more the 'seeing a shape moving in the night, and you shoot at it first' type of fear.

Christianity, and all religions for that matter, are pretty much what the believer makes of them.

Yes, there are cultic tendencies, and these are never more apparent than in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christianity. But in the end, these are more the fault of authoritarianism, of cult of personality or manipulation. The same thing happens at a Lyndon LaRouche movement, or a Maoist uprising, or in North Korea.

But many people choose religion for mundane reasons. The believer likes the congregation, or the church has a great youth program, or the believer really likes hymns. Or, as in many cases, the believer wants to change the world for the better.

Now, I am not advocating theism with this thread, but at the same time I am not viewing Christianity as all good or all bad. It is a tradition conceived at a time before germ theory, before genetics, before the theory of evolution - even before we knew the Earth was round. Like any tradition, it has changed with time, and has had reactions against those changes.

As any revolutionary will tell you, large sweeping changes usually don't occur during times of oppression, but during times when certain freedoms were extended, then taken away. Think the US after WWII, USSR after Glasnost, and a current example is Syria.

And of course, with every large sweeping change there is a backlash. But I digress.

Your thoughts?

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would the world be better with or without Christianity? (Original Post) Taverner Jan 2012 OP
I pretty much agree. But the problem with "What if...?" ... immoderate Jan 2012 #1
The world would be a better place without a lot of things. cleanhippie Jan 2012 #2
Provocative question, speaks more to the history of humankind than to... MarkCharles Jan 2012 #3
What's the magic of Christianity AlbertCat Jan 2012 #17
Adoption by the later Roman Empire? FiveGoodMen Jan 2012 #18
As far as I am concerned, most religions are equally un-magical. Or maybe.. MarkCharles Jan 2012 #20
Without. Deep13 Jan 2012 #4
Oh I agree - it can be very evil Taverner Jan 2012 #7
Hard to imagine one worse than Christianity. nt Deep13 Jan 2012 #8
At the risk of fatwa, I would say Islam does... Taverner Jan 2012 #16
Can be, but only because Christianity is weakened... Deep13 Jan 2012 #21
The core doctrine of many religions is evil. They never expected it to go so far. Taverner Jan 2012 #22
agreed. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2012 #13
I vote "Without" too. BiggJawn Jan 2012 #5
By "better," do you mean more promiscuous? ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #6
2 alternative histories... onager Jan 2012 #9
Or a third.... Taverner Jan 2012 #15
It would be better (saner) without all religion, mr blur Jan 2012 #10
I say without and (without going into many ideas on the thought), is the fact that each person... BlueJazz Jan 2012 #11
+1. I was going to say personal responsibility. PassingFair Jan 2012 #12
Come on. You would be taking away a shitload of material from stand up comedians! HopeHoops Jan 2012 #14
Well, if it HADN'T existed way back when.... AlbertCat Jan 2012 #19
Kick. iris27 Mar 2012 #23
 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
1. I pretty much agree. But the problem with "What if...?" ...
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 05:16 PM
Jan 2012

It's the rest of the hypothetical. I'm supposing that people will find some substitute to rationalize what they do. And they will remain ethically what they would have been as a Christian. Now what if we suppose some other ethical intervention? Might help.

--imm

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
2. The world would be a better place without a lot of things.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 06:14 PM
Jan 2012

Whether christianity is one of them is a matter of opinion, an opinion I do not share. I do feel, however, that the world would be better off if we could leave our religious inclinations behind as we progress into the next age of human evolution. Religion had its time and its place, and that time and place came and went some time ago, IMO.

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
3. Provocative question, speaks more to the history of humankind than to...
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 06:22 PM
Jan 2012

the appropriateness or inappropriateness of Christianity.

Your post begs other questions, namely: what is it about the history of civilization that gave the edge to Christianity over Judaism, Islam, Buddhist thinking, or Hindu thoughts? Was the evolution of Christianity as a major influence upon Western European and all American thinking more a result of finding gold and oil and other natural resources here and in Northwestern Europe, and is THAT the reason Hindu or Buddhist thought does not dominate the most advanced, richest, most influential democratic nations of our world of 7 billion people?

Think of a news broadcast on TV any night of the week. We KNOW that over 2 billion people out of 7 billion are followers of a Christian religion. Do we hear news events about the other 5 billion? Do we only follow cataclysmic events like earthquakes, tsunami's or other outrageously destructive events in the world of non-Christians? We do hear a few things about Japan and China here and there, but we hear a lot more about the UK and Germany, both relatively Christian nations. Indonesia has a population of several hundred million, while the UK's population is around 100+ million. Do we hear about people in Indonesia, a country with more time zone areas than the continental USA?

What's the magic of Christianity and how does it influence us to look mostly at the 2/7ths of the world who are mostly Christian?

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
20. As far as I am concerned, most religions are equally un-magical. Or maybe..
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:55 PM
Jan 2012

they all rely upon magic, not sure which.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
4. Without.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:40 PM
Jan 2012

The idea that people deserve to go to hell without intervention and that suffering somehow makes a person better are among the most destructive beliefs I can imagine. The central doctrine of Christianity is evil at its core.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
7. Oh I agree - it can be very evil
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:28 PM
Jan 2012

Christianity is a misanthropic religious, as are all Abrahamic ones.

But what I'm saying is that if we took it out of the picture, something else would pop up in its place.

Assholes are assholes. Christianity is just their excuse. Take it away, and they'll find another.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
21. Can be, but only because Christianity is weakened...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:13 PM
Jan 2012

...by secularism, at least in the industrial world.

It's not just that it can be used for evil. Christianity's core doctrine is evil.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
13. agreed.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jan 2012

One needs only to look at the history of this cult and the blood, vengeance, death, and torture that followed this cult from continent to continent. Everywhere it goes, bad things happen. Pick any slice of time. The Dark Ages? anti-intellectual claptrap and death. Spanish inquisition? ditto. Witch hunts in France, Germany, Italy, and the colonies? Ditto. The Extermination of tribes in the Americas? Ditto. Even now, the catholic/christian influence is causing major harm in Africa. Lynching of gays and "witches", prevention of condom use, and worse.

BiggJawn

(23,051 posts)
5. I vote "Without" too.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:08 PM
Jan 2012

Especially Calvinism. What a sweet deal they have. If you're successful, that's a sure sign of Gawd's favour, and yer blessed.

On the other hand, if you're poor, that's a sure sign that you've pissed off old Whiskers somehow, and he is rightfully punishing you.

And it wouldn't be right to intervene and extend charity to those people because , hey, who are WE to meddle in Gawd's affairs?

Calvinism- christianity for Objectivists who need their celestial security blanky and aren't brave enough to be Atheists.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
6. By "better," do you mean more promiscuous?
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jan 2012

Then probably not.

By "better," do you mean creationism would be less likely to be taught in American schools?

Then probably yes.

onager

(9,356 posts)
9. 2 alternative histories...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:33 AM
Jan 2012

Both from the fun book What If #2:

1. Jerusalem, 33 CE - ignoring a hostile crowd screaming for blood, Pontius Pilate pardons Jesus Christ. Jesus returns home, under the protection of Roman soldiers.

The Romans decide they LIKE this kind of religious leader - he tells people to forgive their enemies and even to pay their taxes! What a guy!

Even though he is still around and presumably the Subject Matter Expert, Jesus lives long enough to see the religion he founded degenerate into innumerable squabbling sects. All claiming to be the Real Xians, of course. Jesus dies at the age of 90, blind and senile.

By then the Roman Emperor takes his title of Pontiff Maximus seriously. He becomes the Emperor-Pope, leader of the One True Xian Church, and ruthlessly cracks down on any hint of heresy or schism.

The Roman Army marches with a convert-or-kill mentality, always accompanied by a sub-army of aggressive Xian missionaries.

On the Roman borders the upstart sect of Islam pops up and is quickly exterminated, becoming a footnote in history.

By the 15th century, word spreads of new lands, across the oceans far to the west. They too will soon become part of the Holy Roman Empire...the REAL one.

2. Actium, 31 BCE - the naval forces of Cleopatra and Marc Antony defeat Octavian. Alexandria, Egypt, becomes the political, educational and religious center of the world.

Earlier members of the Ptolemy family were religiously very...flexible. Ptolemy I let himself be named "Pharoah," even though he was about as Egyptian as Liz Taylor and probably laughed at the whole idea in private.

The Ptolemies invented their own god, Serapis, and saw it spread far beyond Egypt. By the mid-First Century CE, Egypt is ruled by Caesarion - the son of Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. Who, following Ptolemaic practice, married his half-sister Selene - the daughter of Cleopatra and Marc Antony. IOW, one damn formidable family.

They hear of some useful new religious ideas percolating just over the Sinai border, in Palestine. So useful that they convert, as do all their citizens (except for Alexandria's thriving Jewish community, which all rulers had the good sense to leave in peace).

And the world sees the formation of...The First Church of Jesus Christ - Alexandria.


 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
15. Or a third....
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jan 2012

Manicheanism makes big inroads into the Roman empire (as it did.) A man named Saul is met instead by Manicheans instead of Christians, who lead him out of the desert and into Damascus. Manicheanism spreads throughout the empire, taking on many characteristics of this Essene-based obscure Jewish religion called Christianity. Early Christian tradition is adapted into Manicheanism rather than vice versa. Persia becomes the new religious center of the middle east, and Islam makes no inroads into Persia, Assyria, Babylon or anywhere outside the Arabian peninsula.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
11. I say without and (without going into many ideas on the thought), is the fact that each person...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:54 AM
Jan 2012

...would have to accept total responsibility for one's actions.
There would be no "The devil made me/her/him do it" or "God told me this is the right thing to do"

Whatever actions you perform in life, whether good or bad, would be YOUR choice.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
12. +1. I was going to say personal responsibility.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:25 AM
Jan 2012

I know too many people who roll over and put things "in god's hands"
when they should be stepping up and handling their problems.

Although, as an atheist, I often come to the conclusion that
there are some things that I can't change, and that I just have
to live with...so I guess my brain performs the same function,
just without the "savior" aspect.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
19. Well, if it HADN'T existed way back when....
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:12 PM
Jan 2012

... the library at Alexandria might not have been burned and we might not have had the Dark Ages. So we'd be a couple of centuries ahead.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Would the world be better...