Should we have new host elections?

[laconicsax]

This discussion thread was locked by laconicsax (a host of the Atheists & Agnostics group).

When DU3 started, EvolveOrConvolve, laconicsax, and darkstar3 were elected as hosts by this group. Forum hosts can only serve for 90 days but there is no similar provision for group hosts.

To that end, the hosts of this group are leaving it up to you, the membership of the Atheists & Agnostics group whether our group hosts should have limited terms.

Let's now vote on the following:

Should the Atheists & Agnostics group hosting positions be limited to terms of three months?

Should hosts be eligible for serving consecutive terms?

The vote will conclude one week from today. This thread will remain pinned during that time. When the vote concludes, the results will be posted, this thread will be unpinned and locked.

If the vote is to limit hosts to three-month terms, the process of nominating and voting for new hosts will begin with a series of new pinned threads.

If the vote is to not limit hosts to three-month terms, the current hosts will remain in their positions until such time as they choose to retire.

Thank you,
laconicsax (a host of the Atheists & Agnostics group)

[kdmorris]

1. I do not think your terms need to be limited

I have had no issues with you three being the hosts and do not have any issues with you three remaining the hosts.

As to the second question, if most of the group votes that your terms should be limited, then I think that hosts should be eligible to throw their name in the hat in subsequent elections.

[rexcat]

2. If the current hosts want to contiune as hosts they should...

throw their hats in the ring along with anyone else who would like to host for the upcoming three month period and let the group decide in a vote.

on edit: the current hosts have done a good job but new "blood" on occasion is not a bad thing.

[EvolveOrConvolve]

3. As hosts, we'll go whichever way the group directs

Outside of a few disruptors, hosting in this group has been a pleasure. And as long as we don't end up with a situation like the Feminists Group is experiencing, my guess is that it will continue to be a pleasure no matter who is hosting.

[rexcat]

7. You handled the disrupters as they should have been handled...

when the religious apologists come into the Atheist forum they have been respectful of late! I think they got the message loud and clear that this is a safe zone for atheists.

The three of you have done a good job. It really does not matter to me if you three continue but if someone else feels the need they should have the opportunity.

on edit: does it have to be three months or can it be longer?

[EvolveOrConvolve]

8. I don't think there's a set time limit in the groups

The main forums only allow 90 day terms, but from what I've read the groups can make their own rules. Since it's not entirely clear, we're leaving it up to the group members.

[rexcat]

10. If that is the case how about every 6 months and look at the issue again at the six month mark...

That is how I see it at this point.

Of course we could have a coup and start a civil war and beware you three and always look to your back for you don't really know who is coming behind you!

[EvolveOrConvolve]

11. LOL, if there's anyone who won't stab me in the back

It's an atheist. We're a prickly, grumpy bunch, but generally trustworthy.

[mr blur]

15. Well, no *true* atheist would.... nt

[Curmudgeoness]

4. No change is necessary IMO.

Limited terms of 90 days will just mean that we have to go through all the shit of nominations and voting every 3 months---and that is just disruptive in itself. Three months go by quickly and it will feel as if we are always redoing it.

I think that if we have hosts who want to retire, or who should be removed, that is the time we should deal with it. And in reality, the host is able to replace a retiring cohost without our approval, if they choose to do so.

My two cents.

[laconicsax]

5. We feel that it's important to let the group have a say in who runs the show.

After all, groups should be about the members, not the hosts.

This thread is all about finding out what direction the group wants to go, and your input is definitely valued.

[Curmudgeoness]

6. We appreciate your asking. Thanks. nt

[dimbear]

9. No need for term limits. Atheists are natural cooperators and work well with others.

Comes from believing in evolution. And you moderator folks are doing a good job.

[enlightenment]

12. Thank you for asking;

but as my granny used to say - if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

It ain't broke.

[yellerpup]

13. You don't need term limits.

As long as you can stand it, please stay with us. /;^)

[JNelson6563]

14. I read here more than I post

but I have been thinking how fortunate we are in this group that we seem to not have the drama I see in so many others. It's like there was no real disruption when DU2 became DU3 here but some groups have had nothing but drama.

I agree with the comments that say we just just keep going as we are unless/until something goes awry.

Julie

[mr blur]

16. Happy to keep things as they are with you three

After all, you haven't thrown me out yet, even though I insulted a True Christian.

[PassingFair]

17. Having viewed the horror of an unplanned succession....

I vote to keep our current benevolent dictators.

[frogmarch]

18. If it's not broken, don't fix it.

I'm pleased with things the way they are and see no reason for a change in hosts.

[lazarus]

19. no need for term limits, but

I encourage the hosts to rotate as soon as they feel they're getting tired of it. Burnout was a major problem with the old DU2 mods.

[onager]

20. Agree with lazarus.

Otherwise I'm of the "ain't broke/don't fix" persuasion.

But if anyone wants to run for Host of this group, I will gladly volunteer to be your Campaign Manager. I'll need a modest slush fund. And as the televangelists say...cash only, no checks.

[laconicsax]

21. Why a slush fund instead of a super PAC?

With a super PAC, you can take checks and credit cards.

[laconicsax]

22. Voting is now closed.

Last edited Sun Feb 26, 2012, 11:18 PM - Edit history (1)

This thread will be unpinned and locked.

Link to the results: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12304287