Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumFavor to ask for star members.
I need 10 people with a star membership to agree to support a new Group that is a safe have under a general religion umbrella.
You can see my discussion in Religion about it starting here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/121829655#post66
If you would just indicate that you are willing to support it on this thread, I would appreciate it. Doesn't mean you have to go there, but that you agree it should be a forum.
Thanks.
Gore1FL
(21,128 posts)happy to do so.
Let's get 9 more.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)I am currently not posting in the Religion forum at this time but did see that thread. I really wanted to respond to more than several of the posters but decided against it.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Or am I one already? Sometimes it's hard to tell.
I'll support it. Hell, it might be fun to watch the sectarian cage match.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And I think you are one already.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)skepticscott
(13,029 posts)why another safe haven group is needed here. Who wants such a group and has been excluded or made to feel unwelcome in Liberal Christians and Progressive People of Faith?
People who whine about the atmosphere in the Religion group have been directed there (and elsewhere) many times, and it still gets very little traffic. What makes anyone think that a new group will see more?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)I just want the complaining about it to stop. Many people say that this forum needs to happen and would make DU a better place. I think it would be the same haven of no action that the other religious safe havens are, but the only way to show that is to get it.
Plus, having 10 people from this forum being the ones to support it would be, somehow, interesting (I'll go with that word).
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)But will the powers that be who make the final decision about starting a new group be satisfied with that motive? Will they want to start a new Group for people who don't want it badly enough to make the effort themselves?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)For the record, that is just my motivation. I think others on this thread are less cynical than I.
teddy51
(3,491 posts)yellerpup
(12,253 posts)and I support your new Group idea. I can't feature how it will work, but let's try it!
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)One of them (don't remember who) had a point about us fucking up their innocent discussions. I guess I can see it would be irritating for christians to be talking about their favorite christmas stories and have a dirty atheist come in and point out how stupid they were for stealing a pagan holiday and making it all about jesus who wasn't even born in the winter anyway...
Perhaps the liberal christian group should be renamed - it does look to me like "Liberal christians and all you less important religions" group. (I do NOT believe it was meant that way to offend less important religions but it can be seen that way)(And by "less important religions" I mean that they are all unimportant to me but Christianity is the majority by far so yeah they get to most ink but maybe it shouldn't be that way)
But either way it gets done, Goblinmonger is 100% right in that it will be nice to not hear "why do theeeeeeyyyyyy get a safe haven and weeeeee dooooooon't?...." all the time.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)Do we indicate our agreement here? Or in Religion on that thread?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And I hope that thread is getting locked soon as a Meta thread (or maybe those are OK in Religion now).
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Seriously? Just because of the whining about how persecuted they are?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And I think the fact that 10 regulars from this form being the "nominators" would have a special irony to it that would make me smile.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)Golly, you're being generous! I see it far more often than that.
All in all, though, I think it's a good idea.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)rexcat
(3,622 posts)"atheist" who appear to be theist apologists ! One does not need to be religious to have a persecution complex.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)I would also petition for a pinned thread in the Religion group pointing folks to the new forum and the already existing "Progressive Christians" forum. If no one posts there, it's worse than no group, I think.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)I support this.
frogmarch
(12,153 posts)do I still have my star?
Guess not. I thought it was good till August or so. hmmm
onager
(9,356 posts)That's the reason for the self-delete below. I agreed to endorse this, then realized my star was gone!
Where'd my star go? I think some Persian woo-woos stole it and hung it over a stable in Bethlehem or something.
Hmmm myself. Will have to fix that star-free condition.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)But I have to heartily commend you for doing this. Fucking awesome.
Maybe the new group will be as active as the Christian Liberals group! *snort*
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)And I can promise that I'll never set foot in it.
Lisa0825
(14,487 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Probably won't make any difference but it couldn't hurt either..
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)I know how much I love the safe haven of the Atheist group, why shouldn't believers have the same? Perhaps then it will be less tempting to try to slip into the AA forum and do some stealth soul saving (which we all recognize and find annoying).
Lots of reasons I think this is a good idea.
Julie
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Rhiannon12866
(205,233 posts)Although my first choice would be a forum where everybody had to be nice to each other.
Response to Goblinmonger (Original post)
onager This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rob H.
(5,351 posts)Unless I'm reading the group's description wrong, isn't the "Liberal Christians & Progressive People of Faith" group a safe haven group? It seems as if the "Progressive People of Faith" part of the name would cover a pretty wide range of people, too.
I understand you're stepping up because the believers who complain about there being no such group seem to prefer to complain about its absence rather than taking the necessary steps to start one. I'm in favor of the idea, don't get me wrong, I just find it odd that there are people acting as if such a group doesn't already exist.
Edited to add: if it gets people to stop complaining, then I'm all for it. And yes, I realize I don't have a star anymore. (It expired last month.)
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Apparently, the "Liberal Christians" weren't too keen on sharing and the "Progressive People of Faith" were put off by the "Liberal Christians."
Rob H.
(5,351 posts)Believers who are supposedly interested in getting liberal atheists on board with religious liberals can't even agree among themselves about which believers belong in an already-existing (what's supposed to be) "umbrella" group? I wish I could say I'm surprised, but....
Edit: Left out a word. Oopsie!
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Let me see if I can find the H&M thread where the magic happened.
Found it: http://www.democraticunderground.com/124033077#post149