Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,937 posts)
Sun Aug 23, 2020, 01:44 PM Aug 2020

Mount Rushmore protest leader faces felony charges

RAPID CITY (AP) – The leader of a July 3 protest before President Donald Trump's visit to Mount Rushmore is facing added charges that bring his potential prison sentence to 17 years.

Pennington County prosecutors have added a felony and misdemeanor charge to their case against Nick Tilsen, who helped lead a demonstration that blocked a road leading to Mount Rushmore, the Rapid City Journal reported. He had already been charged with two felonies and three misdemeanors.

Law enforcement officers, including the South Dakota National Guard, confronted the protesters after they used vans to form a blockade to call for the Black Hills to be returned to the Lakota people. As law enforcement officers advanced on the blockade, protesters scuffled with the officers and took one of their shields.

Tilsen is charged with assault and robbery for allegedly attacking a law enforcement officer and stealing the shield. The new charges stem from his alleged assault of a Pennington County Sheriff's Office detective.

Read more: https://brookingsregister.com/article/mount-rushmore-protest-leader-faces-felony-charges

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mount Rushmore protest leader faces felony charges (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2020 OP
It'll get tossed. marble falls Aug 2020 #1
If it was just for the protest, I'd be inclined to agree ... mr_lebowski Aug 2020 #3
Yeah, if he did that, he went over the top. BComplex Aug 2020 #4
agreed. but judges have to allow for real life situations stopdiggin Aug 2020 #5
I'm in the exact same boat as you ... mr_lebowski Aug 2020 #6
Good grief uppityperson Aug 2020 #2
There were several eyewitnesses and cameras there... 2naSalit Aug 2020 #7
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
3. If it was just for the protest, I'd be inclined to agree ...
Sun Aug 23, 2020, 02:10 PM
Aug 2020

If he actually assaulted the cops and it can be proven, then he's probably going to do time.

stopdiggin

(11,242 posts)
5. agreed. but judges have to allow for real life situations
Sun Aug 23, 2020, 02:55 PM
Aug 2020

You'd agree that protest is a bit of a tricky legal area?
Protest line -- law enforcement advances into line of protesters -- physically pushing through -- if protester pushes back, that's legally assault. But I think that kind of action is the type that should be ignored -- in fact understood as part of the protest. On the other hand -- if either side is swinging fists (or any other object), hurling things at "opponents" -- different deal entirely.

And -- freely admit that I do not know the particular circumstances here. Seems to me if you are physically removing gear from a police officer -- that rises to a level a little more involved than just a bit of pushing and shoving.

2naSalit

(86,323 posts)
7. There were several eyewitnesses and cameras there...
Sun Aug 23, 2020, 03:15 PM
Aug 2020

I watched it on a livestream. So get the videos queued up.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»South Dakota»Mount Rushmore protest le...