Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Asian Group
Related: About this forumOrientalism and the Ghost in Hollywoods Shell
by Hermit_Hwarang
The term ghost in the machine was coined in 1949 by British philosopher Gilbert Ryle as a critique of Cartesian dualism. Ryle rejected the notion that the body was little more than a machine operated by the independent ghost of the human mind, arguing instead that the two were fundamentally interconnected. Over the ensuing decades, the phrase gained popularity within philosophy, notably with the publication of Arthur Koestlers 1967 book of the same name, and eventually seeped into popular culture and language.
Ryles phrase inspired the title of Shirow Masamunes Ghost in the Shell, a science fiction manga and anime that imagines a future Japan in which human ghosts could be transplanted into biological robot shells. Ghost in the Shell questions what happens to the category of human when the physical distinctions between people and machines disappear. It was lauded internationally in literary and artistic circles as a powerful existentialist meditation on transhumanism, and has served as the inspiration for other films of a similar premises and philosophic bent, most notably the Wachowski brothers Matrix trilogy.
While Shirows classic has become one of the most beloved and respected mangas of all time, it would appear that Rupert Sanders Paramount Pictures-backed live-action adaptation fails to measure up. When it was released this past weekend, Sanders Ghost in the Shell failed to earn back even half of its $110 million budget, performing so dismally that it inspired Vanity Fair to question whether this was the nail in the coffin of Hollywoods long tradition of whitewashing.
Its certainly true that Ghost in the Shell is not the only recent film to have its box office performance undercut by whitewashing controversy (Exodus: Gods and Kings, Pan, Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot, The Last Airbender, Aloha). However, the thesis of whitewashing as box office bomb doesnt hold up when you look at all instances. Despite tremendous controversy, Great Wall, starring Matt Damon, ended up grossing $330 million (only about $50 million was domestically, but still). Marvels Doctor Strange raked in $677 million in total, along with a 90% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Kubo and the Two Strings scored two Oscar nominations while earning back its budget with a $15 million profit. Even the much-maligned and critically panned Gods of Egypt didnt perform too badly at the box office, ultimately bringing in $150 million on a $140 million budget.
Though it may be tempting to declare Ghost in the Shell the swan song of whitewashing in Hollywood, the evidence would suggest such a proclamation is likely premature. While its certainly true that no great movie has ever been created because of whitewashing, the success of a few recent titles is likely to buoy the practices viability in the boardroom for some time to come. After all, we all still have to watch Death Note, obviously.
more...
https://juhyundred.com/2017/04/04/orientalism-and-the-ghost-in-hollywoods-shell/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 4477 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post