Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:01 PM Jan 2016

Howard Dean, Now Employed by Health-Care LOBBY FIRM, Opposes Bernie Sanders on Single-Payer

vimeo.com/151748674


Howard Dean is the latest in a string of Hillary Clinton supporters to charge that Bernie Sanders is wrong to support a single payer health care plan. The former chairman of the Democratic National Committee claimed on MSNBC last night that Sanders’s reforms might result in “chaos” because “trying to implement it would in fact undo people’s health care.” Dean added: “That is something people should be concerned about.” Dean, a longtime supporter of single-payer, seemed to be changing his tune, a point made by host Chris Hayes during the segment. This evolution of Dean, known within many circles for his spirited critique of the Iraq War during the 2004 Democratic primary, comes as he has settled into a corporate lobbying career.


Dean, though he rarely discloses the title during his media appearances, now serves as Senior Advisor to the law firm Dentons, where he works with the firm’s Public Policy and Regulation practice, a euphemism for Dentons’ lobbying team. Dean is not a lawyer, but neither is Newt Gingrich, who is among the growing list of former government officials and politicians that work in the Public Policy and Regulation practice of Dentons. The Dentons Public Policy and Regulation practice lobbies on behalf of a variety of corporate health care interests, including the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a powerful trade group for drugmakers like Pfizer and Merck.


In 2009, Dean praised single-payer while speaking on Democracy Now, calling the idea “by far the most economically efficient system.” That’s because, as Dean noted at the time, a Medicare-for-all style single-payer system would cut down on bureaucratic overhead and do a better job at controlling prices. An analysis by University of Massachusetts at Amherst professor Gerald Friedman found that the single-payer plan introduced into the last Congress, for instance, would have save $592 billion, while expanding coverage to all uninsured American, regardless of ability to pay. Over 95 percent of households would see higher after-tax income because of the cost controls and elimination of insurance premiums.


Incumbent healthcare interests, particularly drug companies and insurers, have long viewed single-payer as a threat to their business model. Health insurance lobbyist strategy memos that were leaked from a source to veteran journalist Bill Moyers reveal a sophisticated effort to undermine public support for single-payer policies and to discredit Michael Moore’s Sicko, a movie that sharply criticizes the inequities and price-gouging of the American healthcare system. One slide discusses the need to use town halls and special forums to shape the Democratic primary debates in 2008 and peel away support for the reforms proposed in Sicko, while another calls for pundits to appear on television and denounce Moore as harmful to the Democratic Party.


cont'

https://theintercept.com/2016/01/14/howard-dean-lobbyist/
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Howard Dean, Now Employed by Health-Care LOBBY FIRM, Opposes Bernie Sanders on Single-Payer (Original Post) Segami Jan 2016 OP
Lower than pond scum. SamKnause Jan 2016 #1
I'm sure he receives a pretty decent stipend for his advocacy though. NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #19
Dean a great progressive like Hillary that wants thing done: reject Sanders lewebley3 Jan 2016 #34
Along with Hillary Clinton and republicans Autumn Jan 2016 #2
Yaaaaah,...I'm a lobbyist.....Yaaaah! Segami Jan 2016 #3
I`m deeply disappointed in Howard Dean on this issue. democrank Jan 2016 #4
Isn't it obvious by now? Segami Jan 2016 #6
Say what?? He anticipates most Democrats will accept that? Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #5
bitchin grab, segami! restorefreedom Jan 2016 #7
Oh that explains it: he eating from the hand of the worst of 1 %. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #8
go look EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #9
Why not name names - Podesta, HRC's campaign mgr, lobbies for Saudi Arabia, weapons contractors, and kath Jan 2016 #16
[Taps nose] EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #17
they want a split party they got it . olddots Jan 2016 #10
Really telling and very sad. 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #11
He was probably planning to be the next Surgeon General. corkhead Jan 2016 #12
To answer Dr. Dean's question: You phase it in with a public option first. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #13
Thanks Motown_Johnny! I don't completely understand it but... sorechasm Jan 2016 #29
Ahhh, it all becomes clear. Sold. Out. kath Jan 2016 #14
I love Howard Dean, but I disagree with them. bigwillq Jan 2016 #15
should find a way to make single-payer work. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #25
If insurance Corps can afford DC lobbyists and TV ad campaigns-WE PAY TO MUCH FOR INSURANCE Sunlei Jan 2016 #18
As an amateur genealogist, my consolation for finding out I was related to dorkzilla Jan 2016 #20
A nod to the Police and song "Roxanne" Jackilope Jan 2016 #21
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #22
Bernie Sanders - not for sale roody Jan 2016 #23
Never has been. hifiguy Jan 2016 #36
BOUGHT AND PAID FOR. FUNNY HOW THAT HAPPENS. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #24
Blatantly dishonest Mnpaul Jan 2016 #26
Never assume Duckfan Jan 2016 #27
As someone who in 2003, vacillated between Dean and Kerry -- ending strongly for Kerry karynnj Jan 2016 #42
Et tu, Howard? Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #28
I'm pragmatic is often used to justify selling out. Skwmom Jan 2016 #30
Dean and Edwards were two of my top picks over the years Lordquinton Jan 2016 #31
I never understood the passion for Dean passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #32
Chinatown has nothing on the moral ambiguity of our nation's capitol Babel_17 Jan 2016 #33
Another sell-out. hifiguy Jan 2016 #35
Both parties are not the same! Bradical79 Jan 2016 #37
Et Tu, Howard? AzDar Jan 2016 #38
Howard Dean and many other former leaders for change saidsimplesimon Jan 2016 #39
After the clip he tries to justify her hypocrisy by saying the poll numbers are close.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #40
Incest. It's what's for Primary Season. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #41
Oddly familiar technique! HenryWallace Jan 2016 #43
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
19. I'm sure he receives a pretty decent stipend for his advocacy though.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

That's pretty much the way DC operates. Hopefully Bernie will be able to change that.

democrank

(12,598 posts)
4. I`m deeply disappointed in Howard Dean on this issue.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jan 2016

Perhaps he`s looking for a job in the Clinton administration should she win.


GO BERNIE!

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
6. Isn't it obvious by now?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jan 2016

The only thing thats missing is Dean wearing a t-shirt on air saying 'Appoint Me Hillary'....


........oh,...too much floor giggling, I coughed up a little bit of my breakfast..

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. Say what?? He anticipates most Democrats will accept that?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016
Majority still support single-payer option, poll finds

By Sarah Ferris
The Hill, January 19, 2015

More than five years after the single-payer system was scrapped from ObamaCare policy debates, just over 50 percent of people say they still support the idea, including one-quarter of Republicans, according to a new poll.

The single-payer option – also known as Medicare for all – would create a new, government-run insurance program to replace private coverage. The system, once backed by President Obama, became one of the biggest casualties of the divisive healthcare debates of 2009.

The idea remains extremely popular among Democrats, with nearly 80 percent in support, according to the poll, which was shared first with The Hill by the Progressive Change Institute.

“There is a hunger in America for big progressive ideas," spokesperson TJ Helmstetter wrote in a statement. "The state of our union is progressive, and the president would be smart to give America the big, popular, progressive economic ideas that people have been crying out for.”

Another proposed idea under ObamaCare – the public option – also retains wide approval.

Only 13 percent of people said they opposed the public option, which would give individuals the choice of buying healthcare through Medicare or private insurers.

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2015/january/majority-still-support-single-payer-option-poll-finds

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
7. bitchin grab, segami!
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jan 2016

excellent op!

oh, and screw dean. i regret ever supporting him. just another player.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
9. go look
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:14 PM
Jan 2016

at who pays for your favourite candidate to be in office, then check their votes...

For instance, Hillary's campaign manager owns one of Washington's largest lobbying firms, and has Saudi Arabia and multiple military weapons contractors as clients... and Bank of America.

kath

(10,565 posts)
16. Why not name names - Podesta, HRC's campaign mgr, lobbies for Saudi Arabia, weapons contractors, and
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

Other very lovely entities.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
12. He was probably planning to be the next Surgeon General.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jan 2016

I doubt that Bernie will select him now.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
13. To answer Dr. Dean's question: You phase it in with a public option first.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016

Medicare overhead is about 6%. The 80/20 rule holds private insurance overhead to 20% (although there are exceptions).

If we assume the same risk analysis for both private companies and Medicare (just for the sake of argument, plus it may average out given that we are talking about millions of people) then there is roughly 14% of the premium difference between the two.


Allow people to buy into Medicare. Cut that 14% in half and give the people buying in a 7% savings when compared to private insurance. Then use that other 7% to help fund the change over to a single payer program.

The amount of time it would take is impossible for me to predict. Maybe people won't want to buy in so there is very little money to use. Maybe there are so many people wanting to buy in (I would be one of those) that you may need to only allow people over 50 to buy in at first, then 40, then 30 then everyone.

I don't care if it takes 20 years to phase it in. I don't care if I don't live to see the day when it finally is implemented. My death would be a little easier if I went knowing that we were on that path.

This can be done. Bernie's plan is viable and Politifact's confirmation of the savings proves that. Getting the bridge money isn't an issue.


Besides, it isn't like we haven't run a deficit before. You don't really need my plan. Just put it on the credit card and use the long term savings to pay it off. I like my plan better, but that is still an option.




sorechasm

(631 posts)
29. Thanks Motown_Johnny! I don't completely understand it but...
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jan 2016

your analysis is a beacon in the fog of distractions by lobbyists like Dr. Dean. (I'm so sorry for having to call him that.) Sounds like his 'need a bridge' argument is just another fog generator.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
15. I love Howard Dean, but I disagree with them.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:02 PM
Jan 2016

Our elected officials should find a way to make single-payer work.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
25. should find a way to make single-payer work.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

We went to the Moon in the '60s.

We just took close up pics of Pluto.

We built Hoover Dam

We can't make a single payer option work???????

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
18. If insurance Corps can afford DC lobbyists and TV ad campaigns-WE PAY TO MUCH FOR INSURANCE
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:23 PM
Jan 2016

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
20. As an amateur genealogist, my consolation for finding out I was related to
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

George Bush was that I was also related to Howard Dean. Sigh...not anymore.

I guess now I have to console myself with Vincent Price and Humphrey Bogart. And Edward III.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
26. Blatantly dishonest
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jan 2016

This is no better than the so called terrorism experts on TV who are lobbyists for the defense industry. Fess up Howard.

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
27. Never assume
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jan 2016

That a candidate/former candidate will stand up for the little guy...consistently. Really sad that a dude I worked my ass off for in 2003 turned to the "Dark Side"

I'm ripping up my pics I took of him from San Francisco rally and sending them to him with my thoughts.

karynnj

(60,968 posts)
42. As someone who in 2003, vacillated between Dean and Kerry -- ending strongly for Kerry
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:15 PM
Jan 2016

I would suggest that you keep any pictures you have of the rally. They are part of YOUR past as well as of Dean. Your work supporting Dean was based on your values (which I would assume are very close to what they are now) and on what he represented at the point.

One problem we all have is that the intensity of a campaign - especially one that captures your heart, as well as your head - is that all candidates are pushed into a rather two dimensional version of the real multidimensional person they are and they they are really the center of a hurricane. They have to depend on their team's advice.

However, after the election is over, they return to real life. They are no longer the cartoon hero they were seen as - they are real people. With Dean, I suspect that more than most, he was captured in a whirlwind and defined by people like Trippi. Some parts of 2004 Dean are real - he is willing to be outspoken and he was against the war from the point it started in 2003 - and did not have a vote that could be twisted against him.

Where he likely was different was he was seen as very progressive, when he had been a very moderate governor of VT who, before he entered politics, was for the Democratic incumbent mayor of Burlington -- not Bernie. I think he was extremely good as a cheerleader and advocate of helping people run stronger than otherwise campaigns. I live in Burlington now - and love the bike path that he and others fought for. He also as governor encouraged a local non profit to get him a proposal for the bike ferry that exists in the summer allowing bikers to take a causeway to the Champlain Islands from Burlington/Colchester. (The ferry transports bikers over a short gap that once was spanned by a rotating bridge on the rail line over the causeway.)

I was unimpressed by the website he created backing the public option -- it misstated too many people in Congress - then horrified when he called on Senators to vote against a plan if it did not have a public option -- which Lieberman already had rejected meaning we had less than 60 Senators for anything he would approve. I was shocked when he was against even negotiating with Iran -- as a lobbyist for the MEK people. In both these instances, had he won - things that I think good for the US or world would not have happened. Yet, he very likely believed in what he was doing in both cases.

It is rare that anyone who has opinions will find many people he always agrees with when viewed over a long period of time.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
28. Et tu, Howard?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jan 2016

It's not the fact that everyone has a "price" that depresses me. It is the fact that the price is so damned low.



Spock wept.

Roddenberry 3:16

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
30. I'm pragmatic is often used to justify selling out.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jan 2016

When they want you to sell out people will often tell you that you need to be pragmatic. I just had this conversation last night with someone in regards to Dean's comment about being pragmatic. We'll I sure it the nail on the head in this case.


Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
31. Dean and Edwards were two of my top picks over the years
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jan 2016

This revelation almost hurts more than what happened to Edwards, at least that wasn't a political betrayal.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
35. Another sell-out.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

Disgusting.

And to think i used to have a ton of respect for him.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
37. Both parties are not the same!
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jan 2016

Aparently that's only true because the Democrats have been holding out for more money. Between this, another long time DU poster calling tax increases on the wealthy "organized pickpocketing of the rich", and unicorn jokes over wanting a type of healthcare system that is proven to have superior results, I'm feeling a little down on the party.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
39. Howard Dean and many other former leaders for change
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jan 2016

have joined the more profitable "dark side" in the Democratic Party, quelle surprise! OK, maybe not the dark but definitely the blind side.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
40. After the clip he tries to justify her hypocrisy by saying the poll numbers are close....
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jan 2016

If the poll numbers are close than it's okay to lie.

 

HenryWallace

(332 posts)
43. Oddly familiar technique!
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

First you send out your daughter to claim that "he's trying to take away your health insurance!"

Then you send out someone to attack a plan that he previously supported (think Romney and the ACA).

What next, have Tom Harkin hit the Iowa campaign trail accusing Bernie of wanting to setup "death panels?"

Jesus, Mary & Joseph...... This reeks of desperation!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Howard Dean, Now Employed...