2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVerbatim: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Democratic Debate Schedule Was INTENDED To ‘Maximize’ Exposure
WHAAAAAAAAT??..........
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, responding on CNN to criticism from some in her party that the Democratic debate schedule, which has included weekend forums, gives an advantage to Hillary Clinton.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/17/verbatim-debbie-wasserman-schultz-says-democratic-debate-schedule-was-intended-to-maximize-exposure-to-voters/
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Unfortunately, the answer appears to be "very"!
The kind of nonsense they shovel on a routine basis just boggles the mind.
DWS has got to go. She's good for nothing but lies and destruction.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)her notion of maximizing exposure or lying about how she thought this schedule could maximize exposure.
lob1
(3,820 posts)She's either really stupid, or she thinks we are.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Such a thoroughly rigged system, isn't it?
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Romis
(39 posts)She could have been a plant from the right from the very beginning. Money
has taken over our Congress.
Hey Debbie, it's obvious--you can't bullshit this one.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Segami
(14,923 posts)her own!
elleng
(131,129 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)Whit Debbie Wasserman Schultz steering the Democratic boat we will all be sunk.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)i, however, don't believe that's the case. she's not incompetent - she's a liar
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)She is either DEMONSTRABLY incompetent, or DEMONSTRABLY a liar working on the inside for her candidate. There is no other option. And either case shows she's NOT fit to be chair of the DNC and should be made to step down IMMEDIATELY so that the people of this party can have someone we can put our hopes in to restore the strength of the REAL people of this country and not the corporate people she serves.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)yet it's allowed to continue
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..the people who OWN the DNC and the current Party Leadership like her "work".
She was "incompetent" in 2008 when she ran the DCCC's Red to Blue program where she refused to endorse Democrats in Florida for vulnerable Republican seats.
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)In fact, she could be a liar BECAUSE she's incompetent.
In any event, she should be dismissed with prejudice.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)he shouldn't even be allowed near DC
beac
(9,992 posts)But, on this particular subject, she's only demonstrating her finely-honed lying skills.
When it comes to electing Democrats, her massive incompetence shines.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)I found it so hard to believe that I thought for sure they had screwed up in the translation.
Wow, she has no shame in lying to the American public. No shame.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)and thinks we're stupid enough to believe them. What total arrogance.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)She thinks we're brain dead.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)the lies trip lightly off your tongue, the only problem is keeping straight which pack of lies you've committed to with which people.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)DWS defines EXACTLY what kind of integrity they have and what sort of respect for Democrats they practice.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She also says marijuana leads to heroin addiction but prescription opiates don't, because quote "marijuana and opiates aren't the same thing"
She seems to have a little trouble with logical reasoning.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)March 9th, shows us how much she wants people
in the Super Tuesday states
to make a timely decision.
SUUUURE!
djean111
(14,255 posts)persuade me to support Hillary. Not even if Bernie said hey, I was just kidding - support Hillary. Nope.
I am basing my support on issues and past deeds.
TheBlackAdder
(28,218 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)deathrind
(1,786 posts)The case she should be fired immediately for dereliction of duty. Scheduling a debate on a Sunday when playoffs are on shows a stunning lack of understanding what "maximum exposure" means.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)exposure means.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Is that side of the coin as well. I would venture a guess that your version is more accurate than mine.
Sanity Claws
(21,854 posts)1. She is totally incompetent and does not know how to schedule to maximize exposure
2. She is a fucking liar who thinks we are stupid.
Whichever one is true is sufficient to fire her immediately
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)And it magically went unnoticed and uncommented on for 2 months. We're not the dummies.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Number of debates. Then it occurred to me; how can they regret the number if they were not the ones deciding the number?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Did the whole thing. Most of what I read is here with some raw story or huff post. Occasionally I follow link from here bit prefer not to do that.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)of the doubt. Don't want to Attack.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)if she had scheduled all of them at 3AM, her statement might have been a little more believable.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)"I did not have sex with that woman."
"I am not a crook."
"My integrity has been impugned."
There are those moments when you expect a politician to look you in the eye and ask, with a smug grin on his face, "Well, what did you expect me to say?"
And sometimes he just said something so obviously absurd that you want to look back at him in his eyes and calmly say, "Will you please just cut the bullshit, you worthless, incompetent motherfucker?"
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Jarqui
(10,130 posts)expecting to "to maximize the opportunity for voters to see our candidates" then she's proven she really hasn't got a friggin' clue and should resign immediately.
Fact is the co-chair of the Clinton campaign is just doing what her candidate did this week and for much of her political career: lying.
Her candidate had a big lead and the schedule was to minimize anyone seeing a debate that could cut into that big lead. Sanders wasn't well known and co-Clinton campaign chair Debbie wants to keep it that way (which is why you need to be wary of the national polls).
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Debbie Schultz needs to oil her rusty hamster wheel.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)So much so that she now has a primary challenger some of us are going to work very hard for.
Response to Segami (Original post)
Dont call me Shirley This message was self-deleted by its author.
zazen
(2,978 posts)Believe me, I detest everything the woman's done, but let's not reduce her to pornography.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)barbtries
(28,811 posts)but thank you for reminding me that i have mail from the dnc which appears to contain a self addressed stamped envelope inside. now let me go see about my response to their request for support....
democrank
(11,109 posts)Here`s what happens when you spend your days riding the Spinmobile at Corporate Headquarters.
What`s next? A 3:00 a.m. debate on February 31st?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,866 posts)Did DWS take public relations lessons from Baghdad Bob?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Or she is lying.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Does the DNC establishment truly believe that their base Democratic supporters are this ignorant and uninformed? I don't mind when they try this crap with the rightwingers but don't piss on me and tell me its raining...
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Jeez she must think we are all that dumb.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)What BS statistics did you look at that indicate those times would maximize exposure???
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)either way, she needs to go.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Sienna86
(2,150 posts)She did just the opposite.
Uncle Joe
(58,425 posts)since lies were invented, but if by some snowball's chance in hell Schultz isn't lying, then she's totally incompetent beyond measure.
Thanks for the thread, Segami.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)any more, according to her definition of the word, would have been to schedule a debate to be broadcast only on a low wattage college radio station from a remote corner of an unpopulated state at the same time as the Super Bowl.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)I think her strategy has worked to some degree. I'm seeing one of the candidates as they really are.
Thanks, Debbie!
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)99% of Sunday viewers are thinking about football all day long, and thinking about politics not one iota. Just a guess.
Omaha Steve
(99,730 posts)Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
lame54
(35,325 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Bernie doesn't and that is one of the many reasons I support him.
valerief
(53,235 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,382 posts)Not only are there too few, they're in the wrong place at the wrong time. IA and NH have had their debates literally months before they vote. in the 2008 contest, IA had four debates, two the month prior to the vote. NH had their last debate the Saturday before a Tuesday vote.
Debbie is full of shit.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Either a liar or a fool and needs to resign
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)oh, the irony.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)Yeah, it looks like no one is interested in attending, either. Better things to do, like finish a 3-day weekend vacation, watch Downton Abbey, wash my hair, etc.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If I want a lot of people to see a debate I would put at least one on a cable channel. And have another on a Saturday night. And have another during football playoffs. I mean isn't that how you get the most people to watch?
PADemD
(4,482 posts)I wonder if the lack of funds could be the reason why there is such a crummy debate schedule.