Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:58 PM Jan 2016

Verbatim: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Democratic Debate Schedule Was INTENDED To ‘Maximize’ Exposure



WHAAAAAAAAT??..........




"...I did my best to make sure, along with my staff and along with our debate partners, to come up with a schedule that we felt was going to allow for the — to maximize the opportunity for voters to see our candidates....”


— Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, responding on CNN to criticism from some in her party that the Democratic debate schedule, which has included weekend forums, gives an advantage to Hillary Clinton.


http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/17/verbatim-debbie-wasserman-schultz-says-democratic-debate-schedule-was-intended-to-maximize-exposure-to-voters/

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Verbatim: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Democratic Debate Schedule Was INTENDED To ‘Maximize’ Exposure (Original Post) Segami Jan 2016 OP
The "Debbie Doll"....wind it up and it lies. Punkingal Jan 2016 #1
She's obviously had a lot of practice and a lot of good coaching. How stupid do they think we are? highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #61
Wow. Gross miscalculation whether it refers to HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #2
Ratings suck on the weekends. lob1 Jan 2016 #57
Well bless her heart. eom saltpoint Jan 2016 #3
She's a fuckin liar. Fuck her and corporatists friends. JRLeft Jan 2016 #4
+1 Populist_Prole Jan 2016 #36
Oh definitely, Wall Street must be protected at all cost. JRLeft Jan 2016 #45
+1000. If you didn't break out the French then I was going to have to. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #70
Could be ....... Romis Jan 2016 #76
Wow.. jkbRN Jan 2016 #5
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha restorefreedom Jan 2016 #6
She might be feeling the primary heat.... Segami Jan 2016 #7
NO you DIDN'T! elleng Jan 2016 #8
With a mind like that no wonder we got our asses kicked in 2014 awake Jan 2016 #9
if that's the case, it proves her incompetence tk2kewl Jan 2016 #10
Was EXACTLY the words I was thinking of posting before I saw yours... cascadiance Jan 2016 #14
pretty obvious, isn't it? tk2kewl Jan 2016 #17
It is allowed to continue because... bvar22 Jan 2016 #34
She could be both a liar and incompetent, you know Proserpina Jan 2016 #27
it's like Iran-Contra: either Reagan was a Quisling-level villain or his brain was so liquefied MisterP Jan 2016 #38
Alas, I think she is BOTH incompetent AND a liar. beac Jan 2016 #21
Yes to posters 27 and 21 ... Not a leg to stand on. libdem4life Jan 2016 #30
I read this on a spanish site this morning. azmom Jan 2016 #11
so she's just not good at her job. nashville_brook Jan 2016 #12
It infuriates me that she tells such blatant lies MissDeeds Jan 2016 #13
. tk2kewl Jan 2016 #15
She doesn't believe it. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #40
but she wants us to tk2kewl Jan 2016 #43
Right. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #44
Even her lies are incompetent. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #16
Once you have sacrificed your principles Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #18
I'm offended that the DNC leadership could think we were so stupid. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #19
DINO Debbie sums up everything about Hillary and her supporters. 99Forever Jan 2016 #20
Sort of like how you keep that ugly sofa in the basement cuz you want everyone to see it. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #22
The fact that the 6th debate is scheduled for sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #23
Speaking for myself - there is literally nothing Bernie could say in a debate that could djean111 Jan 2016 #24
For about 2 months, she was told it was a shitty schedule and did nothing to correct it! nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #25
It's gotten exposure alright. Just not the debates. mmonk Jan 2016 #26
If that is truly... deathrind Jan 2016 #28
might I suggest "a true understanding and stunning manipulation of what maximum libdem4life Jan 2016 #31
There... deathrind Jan 2016 #67
Two ways to respond to this: Sanity Claws Jan 2016 #29
And who in their right mind thinks she did this without consulting Hillary's Group? Duh. libdem4life Jan 2016 #32
Lord, she'll surely be in a Clinton Cabinet...Press Secretary, no doubt. libdem4life Jan 2016 #39
I read somewhere recently that Hillary camp is regretting low 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #81
Huh? You got that exactly from which source? DWS? Who did decide. Bernie's camp? LOLOL libdem4life Jan 2016 #84
I think Hillary and Dws 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #88
You bet they did. Sisters in Control Politics. Some call it dirty, but I'll give them the benefit libdem4life Jan 2016 #89
Maybe maximize doesn't mean what she thinks it means.... virtualobserver Jan 2016 #33
"The hardest part of my job is convincing people that the war in Iraq is related to terrorism." Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #35
huh bkkyosemite Jan 2016 #37
If Debbie is really that stupid - to put debates on at the times she did Jarqui Jan 2016 #41
My goodness silenttigersong Jan 2016 #42
Well it has maximized her exposure for sure. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #47
please retract ASAP this says feminist Bernie supporter zazen Jan 2016 #82
K. Sorry. Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #90
thx! :-) zazen Jan 2016 #91
that's a bald faced lie barbtries Jan 2016 #48
Maximizing exposure according to Debbie. democrank Jan 2016 #49
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Hinderburg Safety Track Record "Second To None" Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #50
WTF? The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #51
So she's admitting she's incompetent SHRED Jan 2016 #52
It's sheer ignorance humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #53
We are supposed to believe that? Cleita Jan 2016 #54
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Jar Jar Binks "Most beloved cinema character of all time" Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #55
hill and deb , two of kind.......neither give a shit about the country, the people or the party.. bowens43 Jan 2016 #56
Debbie, show us the data to back your statement! Helen Borg Jan 2016 #58
Debbie is lying or incompetent Geronimoe Jan 2016 #59
Does Debbie lie? Are her lips flappin'? nt nc4bo Jan 2016 #60
Between football playoffs and Downton Abbey..yeah right. Sienna86 Jan 2016 #62
That's got to be the most ridiculous piece of shit lie to come down the pike Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #63
The only way she could have "maximized" exposure LibDemAlways Jan 2016 #64
"...maximize the opportunity for voters to see our candidates.” Contrary1 Jan 2016 #65
Let's see...football, or democratic debate? I'm just guessing, but I'd say silvershadow Jan 2016 #66
Help fire DWS Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #68
She's either lying or incompetent lame54 Jan 2016 #69
You beat me to it. Exactly. She's openly admitting one of those is true, maybe both. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #72
Don't insult my intelligence Debbie. Marie Marie Jan 2016 #71
Maximum exposure to, er, Asia? Antarctica? Certainly not America. nt valerief Jan 2016 #73
LOL !!! - More Here: WillyT Jan 2016 #74
War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. DWS Scheduled Debates to Maximize Exposure. mhatrw Jan 2016 #75
These debates were set up to have minimal impact BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #77
then she is incompetent and needs to resign. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #78
She just tweeted this photo: Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #79
LOL. Ilsa Jan 2016 #86
I know, and she is too full of it to see what it says about her. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #87
Well that is what I would do Kalidurga Jan 2016 #80
Does the DNC pay the networks for each debate? PADemD Jan 2016 #83
She is insufferable. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #85
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining n/t DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #92
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
61. She's obviously had a lot of practice and a lot of good coaching. How stupid do they think we are?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

Unfortunately, the answer appears to be "very"!

The kind of nonsense they shovel on a routine basis just boggles the mind.

DWS has got to go. She's good for nothing but lies and destruction.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. Wow. Gross miscalculation whether it refers to
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jan 2016

her notion of maximizing exposure or lying about how she thought this schedule could maximize exposure.

Romis

(39 posts)
76. Could be .......
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jan 2016

She could have been a plant from the right from the very beginning. Money
has taken over our Congress.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
6. hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jan 2016

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

awake

(3,226 posts)
9. With a mind like that no wonder we got our asses kicked in 2014
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jan 2016

Whit Debbie Wasserman Schultz steering the Democratic boat we will all be sunk.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
10. if that's the case, it proves her incompetence
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jan 2016

i, however, don't believe that's the case. she's not incompetent - she's a liar

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
14. Was EXACTLY the words I was thinking of posting before I saw yours...
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jan 2016

She is either DEMONSTRABLY incompetent, or DEMONSTRABLY a liar working on the inside for her candidate. There is no other option. And either case shows she's NOT fit to be chair of the DNC and should be made to step down IMMEDIATELY so that the people of this party can have someone we can put our hopes in to restore the strength of the REAL people of this country and not the corporate people she serves.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
34. It is allowed to continue because...
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jan 2016

..the people who OWN the DNC and the current Party Leadership like her "work".
She was "incompetent" in 2008 when she ran the DCCC's Red to Blue program where she refused to endorse Democrats in Florida for vulnerable Republican seats.



"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
27. She could be both a liar and incompetent, you know
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:07 PM
Jan 2016

In fact, she could be a liar BECAUSE she's incompetent.

In any event, she should be dismissed with prejudice.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
38. it's like Iran-Contra: either Reagan was a Quisling-level villain or his brain was so liquefied
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

he shouldn't even be allowed near DC

beac

(9,992 posts)
21. Alas, I think she is BOTH incompetent AND a liar.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jan 2016

But, on this particular subject, she's only demonstrating her finely-honed lying skills.

When it comes to electing Democrats, her massive incompetence shines.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
11. I read this on a spanish site this morning.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jan 2016

I found it so hard to believe that I thought for sure they had screwed up in the translation.

Wow, she has no shame in lying to the American public. No shame.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
13. It infuriates me that she tells such blatant lies
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jan 2016

and thinks we're stupid enough to believe them. What total arrogance.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
18. Once you have sacrificed your principles
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:17 PM
Jan 2016

the lies trip lightly off your tongue, the only problem is keeping straight which pack of lies you've committed to with which people.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
20. DINO Debbie sums up everything about Hillary and her supporters.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jan 2016

DWS defines EXACTLY what kind of integrity they have and what sort of respect for Democrats they practice.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. Sort of like how you keep that ugly sofa in the basement cuz you want everyone to see it.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jan 2016

She also says marijuana leads to heroin addiction but prescription opiates don't, because quote "marijuana and opiates aren't the same thing"

She seems to have a little trouble with logical reasoning.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
23. The fact that the 6th debate is scheduled for
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:42 PM
Jan 2016

March 9th, shows us how much she wants people
in the Super Tuesday states
to make a timely decision.
SUUUURE!

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
24. Speaking for myself - there is literally nothing Bernie could say in a debate that could
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

persuade me to support Hillary. Not even if Bernie said hey, I was just kidding - support Hillary. Nope.
I am basing my support on issues and past deeds.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
28. If that is truly...
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:08 PM
Jan 2016

The case she should be fired immediately for dereliction of duty. Scheduling a debate on a Sunday when playoffs are on shows a stunning lack of understanding what "maximum exposure" means.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
67. There...
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:45 PM
Jan 2016

Is that side of the coin as well. I would venture a guess that your version is more accurate than mine.

Sanity Claws

(21,854 posts)
29. Two ways to respond to this:
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

1. She is totally incompetent and does not know how to schedule to maximize exposure
2. She is a fucking liar who thinks we are stupid.

Whichever one is true is sufficient to fire her immediately

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
32. And who in their right mind thinks she did this without consulting Hillary's Group? Duh.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:15 PM
Jan 2016

And it magically went unnoticed and uncommented on for 2 months. We're not the dummies.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
81. I read somewhere recently that Hillary camp is regretting low
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jan 2016

Number of debates. Then it occurred to me; how can they regret the number if they were not the ones deciding the number?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
88. I think Hillary and Dws
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:54 PM
Jan 2016

Did the whole thing. Most of what I read is here with some raw story or huff post. Occasionally I follow link from here bit prefer not to do that.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
89. You bet they did. Sisters in Control Politics. Some call it dirty, but I'll give them the benefit
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jan 2016

of the doubt. Don't want to Attack.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
33. Maybe maximize doesn't mean what she thinks it means....
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:16 PM
Jan 2016

if she had scheduled all of them at 3AM, her statement might have been a little more believable.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
35. "The hardest part of my job is convincing people that the war in Iraq is related to terrorism."
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jan 2016

"I did not have sex with that woman."

"I am not a crook."

"My integrity has been impugned."

There are those moments when you expect a politician to look you in the eye and ask, with a smug grin on his face, "Well, what did you expect me to say?"

And sometimes he just said something so obviously absurd that you want to look back at him in his eyes and calmly say, "Will you please just cut the bullshit, you worthless, incompetent motherfucker?"

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
41. If Debbie is really that stupid - to put debates on at the times she did
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jan 2016

expecting to "to maximize the opportunity for voters to see our candidates" then she's proven she really hasn't got a friggin' clue and should resign immediately.

Fact is the co-chair of the Clinton campaign is just doing what her candidate did this week and for much of her political career: lying.

Her candidate had a big lead and the schedule was to minimize anyone seeing a debate that could cut into that big lead. Sanders wasn't well known and co-Clinton campaign chair Debbie wants to keep it that way (which is why you need to be wary of the national polls).

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
46. Well it has maximized her exposure for sure.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jan 2016

So much so that she now has a primary challenger some of us are going to work very hard for.

Response to Segami (Original post)

zazen

(2,978 posts)
82. please retract ASAP this says feminist Bernie supporter
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:59 PM
Jan 2016

Believe me, I detest everything the woman's done, but let's not reduce her to pornography.

barbtries

(28,811 posts)
48. that's a bald faced lie
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jan 2016

but thank you for reminding me that i have mail from the dnc which appears to contain a self addressed stamped envelope inside. now let me go see about my response to their request for support....

democrank

(11,109 posts)
49. Maximizing exposure according to Debbie.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jan 2016

Here`s what happens when you spend your days riding the Spinmobile at Corporate Headquarters.

What`s next? A 3:00 a.m. debate on February 31st?

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
53. It's sheer ignorance
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:08 PM
Jan 2016

Does the DNC establishment truly believe that their base Democratic supporters are this ignorant and uninformed? I don't mind when they try this crap with the rightwingers but don't piss on me and tell me its raining...

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
56. hill and deb , two of kind.......neither give a shit about the country, the people or the party..
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:23 PM
Jan 2016

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
58. Debbie, show us the data to back your statement!
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:28 PM
Jan 2016

What BS statistics did you look at that indicate those times would maximize exposure???

Uncle Joe

(58,425 posts)
63. That's got to be the most ridiculous piece of shit lie to come down the pike
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jan 2016

since lies were invented, but if by some snowball's chance in hell Schultz isn't lying, then she's totally incompetent beyond measure.

Thanks for the thread, Segami.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
64. The only way she could have "maximized" exposure
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jan 2016

any more, according to her definition of the word, would have been to schedule a debate to be broadcast only on a low wattage college radio station from a remote corner of an unpopulated state at the same time as the Super Bowl.

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
65. "...maximize the opportunity for voters to see our candidates.”
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:38 PM
Jan 2016

I think her strategy has worked to some degree. I'm seeing one of the candidates as they really are.

Thanks, Debbie!

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
66. Let's see...football, or democratic debate? I'm just guessing, but I'd say
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:44 PM
Jan 2016

99% of Sunday viewers are thinking about football all day long, and thinking about politics not one iota. Just a guess.

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)
71. Don't insult my intelligence Debbie.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie doesn't and that is one of the many reasons I support him.

BeyondGeography

(39,382 posts)
77. These debates were set up to have minimal impact
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:32 PM
Jan 2016

Not only are there too few, they're in the wrong place at the wrong time. IA and NH have had their debates literally months before they vote. in the 2008 contest, IA had four debates, two the month prior to the vote. NH had their last debate the Saturday before a Tuesday vote.

Debbie is full of shit.

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
86. LOL.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jan 2016

Yeah, it looks like no one is interested in attending, either. Better things to do, like finish a 3-day weekend vacation, watch Downton Abbey, wash my hair, etc.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
80. Well that is what I would do
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jan 2016

If I want a lot of people to see a debate I would put at least one on a cable channel. And have another on a Saturday night. And have another during football playoffs. I mean isn't that how you get the most people to watch?

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
83. Does the DNC pay the networks for each debate?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:11 PM
Jan 2016

I wonder if the lack of funds could be the reason why there is such a crummy debate schedule.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Verbatim: Debbie Wasserma...