Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:00 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
Bernie waited for Hillary but she turned and walked away! That felt horrible!
All said good night and Bernie waited for Hillary to continue speaking to another, then she turned and walked away. You could see it was deliberate and it looked horrible!
|
141 replies, 13116 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | OP |
fleur-de-lisa | Jan 2016 | #1 | |
hopemountain | Jan 2016 | #139 | |
bigdarryl | Jan 2016 | #2 | |
FlatBaroque | Jan 2016 | #3 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #7 | |
CorporatistNation | Jan 2016 | #29 | |
hifiguy | Jan 2016 | #40 | |
kristopher | Jan 2016 | #87 | |
MissDeeds | Jan 2016 | #48 | |
CorporatistNation | Jan 2016 | #55 | |
azmom | Jan 2016 | #4 | |
DURHAM D | Jan 2016 | #5 | |
tk2kewl | Jan 2016 | #12 | |
demmiblue | Jan 2016 | #17 | |
Green Forest | Jan 2016 | #24 | |
scottie55 | Jan 2016 | #63 | |
Delmette | Jan 2016 | #113 | |
Warren DeMontague | Jan 2016 | #21 | |
SammyWinstonJack | Jan 2016 | #32 | |
Green Forest | Jan 2016 | #20 | |
Logical | Jan 2016 | #22 | |
Green Forest | Jan 2016 | #27 | |
passiveporcupine | Jan 2016 | #70 | |
Marty McGraw | Jan 2016 | #88 | |
CorporatistNation | Jan 2016 | #134 | |
stillwaiting | Jan 2016 | #99 | |
cui bono | Jan 2016 | #117 | |
Skwmom | Jan 2016 | #6 | |
tokenlib | Jan 2016 | #8 | |
earthside | Jan 2016 | #9 | |
FlatBaroque | Jan 2016 | #10 | |
in_cog_ni_to | Jan 2016 | #11 | |
7wo7rees | Jan 2016 | #13 | |
pa28 | Jan 2016 | #14 | |
wilsonbooks | Jan 2016 | #18 | |
tazkcmo | Jan 2016 | #28 | |
pa28 | Jan 2016 | #39 | |
tazkcmo | Jan 2016 | #41 | |
pa28 | Jan 2016 | #51 | |
Fawke Em | Jan 2016 | #56 | |
libdem4life | Jan 2016 | #130 | |
nc4bo | Jan 2016 | #15 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Jan 2016 | #59 | |
gwheezie | Jan 2016 | #16 | |
Logical | Jan 2016 | #23 | |
firebrand80 | Jan 2016 | #101 | |
greiner3 | Jan 2016 | #110 | |
gwheezie | Jan 2016 | #112 | |
cui bono | Jan 2016 | #118 | |
ChisolmTrailDem | Jan 2016 | #19 | |
JRLeft | Jan 2016 | #25 | |
left-of-center2012 | Jan 2016 | #26 | |
Skwmom | Jan 2016 | #30 | |
jalan48 | Jan 2016 | #31 | |
navarth | Jan 2016 | #33 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #123 | |
polichick | Jan 2016 | #34 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #35 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #37 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #45 | |
Ino | Jan 2016 | #92 | |
restorefreedom | Jan 2016 | #97 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #108 | |
restorefreedom | Jan 2016 | #115 | |
restorefreedom | Jan 2016 | #116 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #124 | |
restorefreedom | Jan 2016 | #128 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #127 | |
restorefreedom | Jan 2016 | #129 | |
ecstatic | Jan 2016 | #36 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #43 | |
Beaverhausen | Jan 2016 | #44 | |
artislife | Jan 2016 | #138 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #38 | |
Plucketeer | Jan 2016 | #54 | |
Ed Suspicious | Jan 2016 | #64 | |
tblue37 | Jan 2016 | #57 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #125 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #62 | |
Iwillnevergiveup | Jan 2016 | #67 | |
cui bono | Jan 2016 | #119 | |
TheBlackAdder | Jan 2016 | #75 | |
zentrum | Jan 2016 | #77 | |
Marty McGraw | Jan 2016 | #90 | |
Lorien | Jan 2016 | #80 | |
FailureToCommunicate | Jan 2016 | #42 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #46 | |
dsc | Jan 2016 | #47 | |
SunSeeker | Jan 2016 | #73 | |
FlatBaroque | Jan 2016 | #100 | |
DisgustipatedinCA | Jan 2016 | #109 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #49 | |
Hulk | Jan 2016 | #50 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #52 | |
Hulk | Jan 2016 | #53 | |
Nictuku | Jan 2016 | #81 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #103 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Jan 2016 | #58 | |
countmyvote4real | Jan 2016 | #60 | |
Ed Suspicious | Jan 2016 | #66 | |
Still In Wisconsin | Jan 2016 | #61 | |
Beacool | Jan 2016 | #71 | |
Post removed | Jan 2016 | #78 | |
haikugal | Jan 2016 | #86 | |
Douglas Carpenter | Jan 2016 | #79 | |
Gene Debs | Jan 2016 | #82 | |
bananas | Jan 2016 | #84 | |
TheFarS1de | Jan 2016 | #91 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #65 | |
DFW | Jan 2016 | #68 | |
Divernan | Jan 2016 | #94 | |
DFW | Jan 2016 | #104 | |
Kall | Jan 2016 | #69 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #72 | |
KingCharlemagne | Jan 2016 | #74 | |
Mira | Jan 2016 | #76 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #83 | |
billhicks76 | Jan 2016 | #85 | |
senz | Jan 2016 | #89 | |
Divernan | Jan 2016 | #93 | |
JTFrog | Jan 2016 | #95 | |
toshiba783 | Jan 2016 | #96 | |
complain jane | Jan 2016 | #98 | |
toshiba783 | Jan 2016 | #122 | |
complain jane | Jan 2016 | #140 | |
Vinca | Jan 2016 | #102 | |
riversedge | Jan 2016 | #105 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #106 | |
JTFrog | Jan 2016 | #107 | |
ViseGrip | Jan 2016 | #121 | |
chervilant | Jan 2016 | #132 | |
chervilant | Jan 2016 | #133 | |
R. Daneel Olivaw | Jan 2016 | #111 | |
farleftlib | Jan 2016 | #114 | |
GeorgeGist | Jan 2016 | #120 | |
RKP5637 | Jan 2016 | #126 | |
GoneOffShore | Jan 2016 | #131 | |
riversedge | Jan 2016 | #135 | |
Nedsdag | Jan 2016 | #136 | |
2pooped2pop | Jan 2016 | #137 | |
99Forever | Jan 2016 | #141 |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:01 AM
fleur-de-lisa (14,564 posts)
1. Yes, she looked petty for doing that. eom
Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #1)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:06 PM
hopemountain (3,919 posts)
139. yes. one has to be careful of how one treats an
opponent because the manner and attitude can work in favor of the opponent - as pointed out by david axelrod during his summary at the end of the cnn debate redux program.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:01 AM
bigdarryl (13,190 posts)
2. What
The fuck!!
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:01 AM
FlatBaroque (3,160 posts)
3. No class whatsoever. Money cannot buy class.
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #3)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:03 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
7. bad sportsmanship for sure
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #7)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:33 AM
CorporatistNation (2,546 posts)
29. That Is Just Hillary Being Hillary.. That IS WHO She IS!!!
There should be no surprise here. Hillary is PISSED!!! Because she got "caught" lying on several occasions principally about her absurd criticisms from the RIGHT about Bernie's Health Care plan, guns, and lying about Wall Street. She got exposed and she IS PISSED!!!!
|
Response to CorporatistNation (Reply #29)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:54 AM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
40. Thread winner.
That's exactly who snd what she is.
|
Response to CorporatistNation (Reply #29)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:09 AM
kristopher (29,798 posts)
87. She looked like she was going to explode when the speaking fees were brought out.
I'd love to know how many time "hillary speaking fees" was googled.
|
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #3)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:05 AM
MissDeeds (7,499 posts)
48. Yep
But she is entitled. Besides, her private jet was probably waiting for her.
|
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #3)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:14 AM
CorporatistNation (2,546 posts)
55. Money Has Exacerbated Her Lack of Character!
!
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:05 AM
tk2kewl (18,133 posts)
12. why is it good?
![]() |
Response to tk2kewl (Reply #12)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:09 AM
demmiblue (36,198 posts)
17. Because PUMA?
I can't think of any other reason why one would condone rude behavior.
![]() |
Response to demmiblue (Reply #17)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:27 AM
Green Forest (232 posts)
24. Because Hillary Is The Perfect Queen of All She Surveys and Bernie is a peasant w/a pitchfork.
Good.
|
Response to Green Forest (Reply #24)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:34 AM
scottie55 (1,400 posts)
63. Hey, I Got The Picthfork
See....
|
Response to scottie55 (Reply #63)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:46 PM
Delmette (522 posts)
113. I have a pitchfork, too!!
![]() |
Response to tk2kewl (Reply #12)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:25 AM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
21. BECAUSE HE DARED TO RUN AGAINST HER, AND IT IS HER TURN DAMMIT
...basically.
|
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #21)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:39 AM
SammyWinstonJack (44,111 posts)
32. Oh yeah......basically. She's not amused.
![]() |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:25 AM
Green Forest (232 posts)
20. Stay classy.
![]() |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:26 AM
Logical (22,457 posts)
22. It's a trait you love about, her being rude? Nt
Response to Logical (Reply #22)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:30 AM
Green Forest (232 posts)
27. Careful! Hillary Is Not To Be Criticized Because She Is Perfection In A Pantsuit.
Really.
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:48 AM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
70. Why would you encourage your candidate to act unprofessionally and discourteously?
Did you like Obama? Could you even imagine him ever acting this way?
All through the debate she was glaring and rude, especially to Bernie, whiile O'Malley and Bernie were polite (even when disputing her) in voice and manner. She can be an asshole at times (which you clearly seem to enjoy) and that's why so many people really don't want to see her in the white house. We want people with courtesy and compassion, like Obama and Bernie. She says she can get people to work together? When she treats them like that? Nope! She is not a uniter. she is power hungry and thinks she can force her will on people. She hates it when people stand up to her like Bernie did tonight. |
Response to passiveporcupine (Reply #70)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:12 AM
Marty McGraw (1,024 posts)
88. courtesy and compassion
where necessitates. Sometime though a little of standing somebody up to the wall LBJ style couldn't hurt. |
Response to passiveporcupine (Reply #70)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:05 PM
CorporatistNation (2,546 posts)
134. Agreed... Hillary Reay IS Full of Herself and IS Miserable To Her Colleagues.
How can someone bring people together when she acts like a 14 year old high school girl. Further evidence denoting her less than adequate character as a person much less a President! K and R!
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:11 AM
stillwaiting (3,795 posts)
99. Added to the list! How have I missed doing so before? I don't play with nasties. nt
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:01 PM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
117. Good
that she will not be president and able to behave so rudely and classlessly with foreign leaders. Wonder if she did/had done that as SOS?
. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:03 AM
Skwmom (12,685 posts)
6. The truth hurts. n/t
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:03 AM
tokenlib (4,186 posts)
8. arrogance...n/t
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:03 AM
earthside (6,960 posts)
9. Really?
I had to go tend to some business and missed the very end.
Well, that demonstrates that Hillary knows that Sen. Sanders clearly won this debate. |
Response to earthside (Reply #9)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:04 AM
FlatBaroque (3,160 posts)
10. It was cringeworthy nt
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:05 AM
in_cog_ni_to (41,600 posts)
11. Sore loser.
I cannot wait until February 1st. He's going to win in a landslide....then she'll have a reason to pout.
PEACE LOVE BERNIE |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:05 AM
7wo7rees (5,128 posts)
13. And now it gets real........ And ugly. Damned shame...
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:05 AM
pa28 (6,145 posts)
14. Sympathy visegrip, sympathy.
Losing your nomination twice in a row when you did everything right and followed all the rules has got to be tough.
|
Response to pa28 (Reply #14)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:16 AM
wilsonbooks (972 posts)
18. The seven emotional stages of grief
The seven emotional stages of grief are usually understood to be shock or disbelief, denial, bargaining, guilt, anger, depression, and acceptance/hope. Symptoms of grief can be emotional, physical, social, or religious in nature.
|
Response to pa28 (Reply #14)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:31 AM
tazkcmo (7,148 posts)
28. Everything right?
That's not what I saw. I saw lots of lies, "evolving" and 3rd Way/DLC policies.
|
Response to tazkcmo (Reply #28)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:53 AM
pa28 (6,145 posts)
39. That's exactly what I meant by "everything right".
Unfortunately for her it's not "right" this year.
|
Response to pa28 (Reply #39)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:54 AM
tazkcmo (7,148 posts)
41. ok, sorry.
Misunderstood. I'm a little slow at times...
|
Response to tazkcmo (Reply #41)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:07 AM
pa28 (6,145 posts)
51. Nah, just my sidways sense of humor.
This was a good night for Bernie.
![]() |
Response to pa28 (Reply #14)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:15 AM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
56. I'll quibble with the "did every thing right" part.
Unless you mean, "TO the right."
![]() |
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #56)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:38 PM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
130. My thoughts exactly, and throw in some shady, stinky, shadowy things to complete it.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:06 AM
nc4bo (17,651 posts)
15. No worries. ...Bernie won that debate and she knows it
And HRH is not amused.
#Feelinberned |
Response to nc4bo (Reply #15)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:18 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
59. He did win it
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:08 AM
gwheezie (3,580 posts)
16. Maybe she had to pee?
Seriously what is wrong with some of you? I saw her and Bernie during one of the breaks walk over to him smiling and put her hand out to him.
They looked pretty cordial to me. |
Response to gwheezie (Reply #16)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:26 AM
Logical (22,457 posts)
23. LOL, good one! Nt
Response to gwheezie (Reply #16)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:09 PM
greiner3 (5,214 posts)
110. And of course you are aware of the significance of the hand shake
In olden times shaking with the right hand (a right handed man takes just that longer to stick a knife into you so an empty hand signifies that person will not stab you at least until your back is turned. BTW she may have been "cordial"to that moment but after he trounced her and 'wounded' her she offered no promises to the stabbing in the future.
|
Response to greiner3 (Reply #110)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:15 PM
gwheezie (3,580 posts)
112. Bernie will be fine
I think ya'll are reading too much into this.
|
Response to gwheezie (Reply #112)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:04 PM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
118. No one is worried about Bernie being fine, we know he's awesome.
This is about Hillary being exceptionally rude and unprofessional.
. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:18 AM
ChisolmTrailDem (9,463 posts)
19. Dang, went to pee and missed it. Oh well, Trevor Noah will have it on TDS tomorrow night, so... nt
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:28 AM
JRLeft (7,010 posts)
25. I don't think that means anything.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:29 AM
left-of-center2012 (34,195 posts)
26. Was her nose out of joint? n/t
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:34 AM
Skwmom (12,685 posts)
30. Not very presidential. n/t
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:38 AM
jalan48 (13,692 posts)
31. She's special.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:45 AM
navarth (5,927 posts)
33. I missed that
but I agree it was a really, really good debate for Bernie.
Any one of these three would be better than the Reptilians. Obviously I prefer Bernie. I also felt that my second choice, Martin O'Malley, really made a dent tonight. And he sure was patient with the way Lester and Mrs. Greenspan ignored him. |
Response to navarth (Reply #33)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:08 PM
Duval (4,280 posts)
123. He's my second choice. Maybe a good VP?
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:46 AM
polichick (37,151 posts)
34. True colors?
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:48 AM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
35. Does anyone of video of these last moments?
I've looked and can't find it.
|
Response to zentrum (Reply #35)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:51 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
37. MSNBC is showing it again, don't know if they'll continue it after, showing them standing around
talking. I can't help out because I cut my cord.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #37)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:56 AM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
45. Thanks. Tried to
…..find the end part but can't get it to come up. Thanx anyway.
|
Response to zentrum (Reply #35)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:55 AM
Ino (3,366 posts)
92. Here it is...
Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:11 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to Ino (Reply #92)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:07 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
97. thanks
wow. entitled and pissed off. if i say any more i will get a hide.
no doubt that was a snub. she even looked at him. wow. |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #97)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:33 PM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
108. Tried to find the
…..moment in this video and all I saw on screen at the end was Chuck, Alan Greenspan's wife, and DWS. Do you have a sense of the minute marks this snub occurred in?
|
Response to zentrum (Reply #108)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:07 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
115. here
comment #35 is the video. the commenter gave the mark..inhink around 2.50 something its in the comment thhough with the video
it goes back to the candidates after todd talks |
Response to zentrum (Reply #108)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:07 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
116. dammit
Last edited Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:38 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #116)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:13 PM
Duval (4,280 posts)
124. No worries, restorefreedom!
I'm glad no one here can see the dumb mistakes I make on my iPhone! We all do it!!
![]() |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #116)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:35 PM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
127. Thanks so much!
Very helpful!
![]() Now that I've seen it——it does look like it was a deliberate snub and he knew it too. Unpleasant. |
Response to zentrum (Reply #127)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:37 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
129. most welcome...yeah, it was pretty ugly. nt
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:50 AM
ecstatic (31,798 posts)
36. Did she even see him or know his supposed intentions?
You're assuming he was waiting for her, and assuming she purposely snubbed him. Let's not jump to conclusions!
|
Response to ecstatic (Reply #36)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:55 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
43. Customary to shake hands, say whatever, always. Only the Hillary Bernie one did not take place.
He was standing there waiting for her to finish, she of course knows the etiquette. This really shows you who she is. Along with being a mother who sent her daughter out to lie. She lied about that again tonight as well, along with saying she is now for 'single payer'. Did you hear that? Anyone catch that?
Hillary is now for single payer? She needs to be asked about this answer that she gave. |
Response to ecstatic (Reply #36)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:55 AM
Beaverhausen (24,420 posts)
44. Don't bother
They'll use anything they can against her.
|
Response to Beaverhausen (Reply #44)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:39 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
138. Just her actions. nt
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:51 AM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
38. Here's some on-line polls
Response to zentrum (Reply #38)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:12 AM
Plucketeer (12,882 posts)
54. Good GOD! Lookit those numbers!
Those DAMNED Bernie folks - voting and voting and voting and voting and..... Hope they vote like that in IA and NH !!!! And of course, the HRC faithful would NEVER vote more than once. Nooooooooooooooooooooo.....
|
Response to Plucketeer (Reply #54)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:35 AM
Ed Suspicious (8,879 posts)
64. I hope some Hillary supporters get the internet, mice, time, and fingers, because these aren't just
for Bernie supporters to participate in.
|
Response to zentrum (Reply #38)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:16 AM
tblue37 (61,983 posts)
57. Time poll: BS 87%; HC 10%; MOM 3%.
Slate poll: BS 85%; HC 12%; MOM 2%.
2nd link poll: BS 94.59%; HC 3.89%; MOM 1.52% 4th link poll: BS 94.35%; HC 3.81%; MOM 1.84% |
Response to tblue37 (Reply #57)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:24 PM
Duval (4,280 posts)
125. Wow!! And it will only get better for Sanders.
Response to zentrum (Reply #38)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:21 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
62. The big joke is that for every one of those, a person can vote as many times as one wants....
....this isn't Chicago.
BTW, I voted 10 times for Clinton and then got tired and realized that it was idiotic to continue. Note: how many of those "polls" said they were unscientific? |
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:40 AM
Iwillnevergiveup (9,298 posts)
67. You know, that's funny
because I tried voting for Bernie twice on the Time poll. It was at 71,645 after I voted once and remained at that number afterward.
|
Response to Iwillnevergiveup (Reply #67)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:08 PM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
119. Turns out the big joke wasn't what someone thought it was after all!
![]() . |
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:04 AM
TheBlackAdder (27,386 posts)
75. So, you admit to trying to skew the online the voting process? Interesting. nt
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:06 AM
zentrum (9,865 posts)
77. You've heard of cookies
….haven't you?
Just because it looks like you can log out and in and "vote" again, and the screen lets you do that—doesn't mean your repeat votes are actually counted—because of cookies. They recognize you and your vote and don't count it over and over again. |
Response to zentrum (Reply #77)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:19 AM
Marty McGraw (1,024 posts)
90. I suppose one
can tell their browser to gobble all them cookies if it has been behaving the way it should. but I highly doubt this was the case for the majority of the surveyed. |
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:11 AM
Lorien (31,935 posts)
80. Um, none allow more than one vote
try it for yourself!
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:55 AM
FailureToCommunicate (13,656 posts)
42. I didn't catch that, BUT I liked that NBC announced that Bernie was the "winner" in the
view of their political commentator immediately afterward.
|
Response to FailureToCommunicate (Reply #42)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:57 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
46. ^^^THIS^^^
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:58 AM
dsc (51,932 posts)
47. yes women must always wait for men before they can leave a room
how dare she forget that.
|
Response to dsc (Reply #47)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:03 AM
SunSeeker (50,354 posts)
73. LOL
Ridiculous isn't it?
![]() |
Response to dsc (Reply #47)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:14 AM
FlatBaroque (3,160 posts)
100. The entire Hillary for President 2016 campaign wrapped up in one post on DU
![]() |
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #100)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (12,530 posts)
109. No shit. It's pitiful.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:05 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
49. Maybe if he didn't keep interrupting her and O'Malley she might have been more receptive....
....but bottom line she was 10X more polite to him than he was to her.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:05 AM
Hulk (6,699 posts)
50. BBC declared HRC "the winner"
I guess I missed something. I wasn't impressed by her desperation and her feigning anger and domination with her answers. Shawdy.
|
Response to Hulk (Reply #50)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:08 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
52. More corporate media ....
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #52)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:11 AM
Hulk (6,699 posts)
53. That's all it is.
That's why I switched over to fox (get it piped in with cable down here in central Mexico.). I can't stand to listen to chuckie, ms greenspan, or any of the other corporate whores tell me what I should think.
I expect propaganda bull shit from fox. Never disappointed. |
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #52)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:23 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
103. BBC is "corporate media"?
Response to Hulk (Reply #50)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:17 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
58. The British Broadcasting corporation?
Tory influenced
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:18 AM
countmyvote4real (4,023 posts)
60. When they show you who they are, believe them. n/t
Response to countmyvote4real (Reply #60)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:37 AM
Ed Suspicious (8,879 posts)
66. +1
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:19 AM
Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)
61. Hillary Clinton is a loathsome human being.
That is all.
|
Response to Still In Wisconsin (Reply #61)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:59 AM
Beacool (30,215 posts)
71. Did you forget that this is a Democratic site?
The nonsense one reads here is astounding........
![]() |
Response to Beacool (Reply #71)
Post removed
Response to Beacool (Reply #71)
Douglas Carpenter This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Beacool (Reply #71)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:17 AM
Gene Debs (582 posts)
82. I'm a registered Democrat, and I, too, find Hillary Clinton to be a loathsome human being. The two
aren't mutually exclusive.
|
Response to Still In Wisconsin (Reply #61)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:30 AM
bananas (27,509 posts)
84. Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
I was juror 2, 3, or 4.
10:17 PM
Automated Message AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Mail Message On Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:09 PM an alert was sent on the following post: Hillary Clinton is a loathsome human being. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1024024 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS Over the top insult of a Dem, no attempt to address an issue, just hate. You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:17 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Ugh, hide Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Poster is expressing an opinion. Alerter had the opportunity to challenge the statement and offer a different point of view. Things get heated on DU during primary season. I've seen much worse. Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Poster has been rude and insulting in previous posts. DU shouldn't have to put up with this kind of rightwing, vicious crap. HIDE. Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Until the nomination process is over people are allowed to express opinions about the candidates freely, unless there was a rule change I missed. Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future. |
Response to bananas (Reply #84)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:08 AM
TheFarS1de (1,017 posts)
91. Strange .
Do they allow multiple reports ?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:36 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
65. It just looked bad.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:44 AM
DFW (52,321 posts)
68. I agree. It was very conspicuous and poor form.
I wonder what was behind that?
|
Response to DFW (Reply #68)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:12 AM
Divernan (15,480 posts)
94. Thought she could insult him on the downlow?
Hillary has remained unable to grasp the reality/possibility of being videotaped just about anywhere.
|
Response to Divernan (Reply #94)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:58 AM
DFW (52,321 posts)
104. Hard to imagine. She is pretty media-savvy by now
Maybe something happened during a break backstage? They seemed cordial in the middle. I'll bet something was said that none of us know about.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:46 AM
Kall (615 posts)
69. Maybe there'll be video
Although I will say it wouldn't surprise me, even though perceptions can be different. People aren't supposed to get in her way.
If she was upset about being called out about her and Chelsea's coordinated lies about Bernie's health care plan, I have no sympathy for her. She shouldn't have made them. |
Response to Kall (Reply #69)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:01 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
72. Exactly...
I look at the debate reports tonight, and it's clear they're pissed off about something. Hillary lying for a week or the real support for Sanders, that will bulldoze the media in IA and NH?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:04 AM
KingCharlemagne (7,908 posts)
74. I hope IA, NH, NV and SC voters drive her out
of the race for that impertinence.
Ugh, just ugh. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:04 AM
Mira (22,359 posts)
76. I saw it, and it made my innards cringe
What makes me sad and wary is that for reasons I don't fully understand I can read and see and hear the thinly veiled thread of what is underlying Mrs. Clinton's words, demeanor and smiles. Unfortunately what I am picking up is mostly a tremendous desire to be President, and it is not really for the right reasons. It to me is almost as if she is putting on being a politician I mistrust as if she were applying make up. I see her fear of losing, and again it's not for reasons that serve the country.
And I specifically saw her dislike of Mr. Sanders and her realization that he bested her in honesty and charisma when she disregarded him callously at the end. I will vote for Mrs. Clinton, if it comes to that. But first I will vote for Bernie with great hope. |
Response to Mira (Reply #76)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:21 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
83. Exactly, I wanted to see the exchange, so I waited and watched. She knew he was right there waiting
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:36 AM
billhicks76 (5,082 posts)
85. She's An Embarrassment
And her attacks make her just look more vile.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:12 AM
senz (11,945 posts)
89. Shockingly immature behavior.
Lately I've been wondering what home life was like for the family.
|
Response to senz (Reply #89)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:07 AM
Divernan (15,480 posts)
93. What tales the Secret Service could tell, but for those confidentiality oaths.
I realize they'd lose their government jobs/pensions if they spoke out, but I hope they are each keeping diaries and writing personal memoirs to be released after their deaths.
|
Response to senz (Reply #89)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:16 AM
JTFrog (14,274 posts)
95. Yes, but it will subside once the primaries are over.
Manufacturing outrage over things like handshake-gate or bathroom-gate is indeed incredibly immature. DU used to be better than this.
![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:32 AM
toshiba783 (74 posts)
96. alternate footage?
The video posted flips back and forth between Todd and the candidates - you do realize it's very possible, and likely, that Bernie and Hillary shook hands BEFORE walking from behind the podiums to meet with the moderators? In fact, Bernie doesn't even appear to be waiting for Hillary, rather waiting to shake hands with Andrea AFTER Hillary.
Do you actually have evidence to corroborate this attack or is it based off of assumptions? |
Response to toshiba783 (Reply #96)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:22 AM
complain jane (4,302 posts)
98. Where is video posted?
I'm interested in seeing too...
|
Response to complain jane (Reply #98)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:44 PM
toshiba783 (74 posts)
122. video
Around 2:50 - there is no evidence of Hillary "snubbing" Bernie. It's really odd to see over a hundred responses cheering for something that is based completely on illogical assumptions:
|
Response to toshiba783 (Reply #122)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:29 PM
complain jane (4,302 posts)
140. Well she definitely ignored him but whether or not it was intentional
is anybody's guess.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:17 AM
Vinca (49,749 posts)
102. I think we have to cut Hillary some slack.
She was the anointed one who had already been fitted for the crown and I'm sure she's in a state of shock half the time.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
riversedge (67,570 posts)
105. Yoda's comments fit your OP.....
![]() |
Response to riversedge (Reply #105)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:08 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
106. Unhinged? This is an observation of a clear snub in protocol, and it looked bad.
Some on Hillary's team didn't like it either. They hoped no one really noticed, as the debate was over. I want people to notice, the type of character she is and the rest of the family.
See 'parents send out daughter to lie'. Bernie went to her after O'Malley, and after Hillary shook O'Malley's hand and began talking to someone else. Bernie stood there and waited for her to finish her conversation, to shake her hand. She clearly turned away, knowing he was there, waiting. Many here saw it too. It speaks to a type of nastiness, and the people are fed up. Another negative action by Hillary. |
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #106)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:27 PM
JTFrog (14,274 posts)
107. An observation made only by her haters.
Haters are going to hate no matter what. They will make up handshake-gate and bathroom-gate and even try to blame Hillary herself for another campaign trying to steal her campaign data.
Yet she handles it all flawlessly. ![]() |
Response to JTFrog (Reply #107)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:38 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
121. Why do you call me a 'hater'? I hate NO ONE in this world. You are a blog hack.
I'm for free speech. Your only answer to this snub that many saw is that I'm a hater?
You're a hater based on your ugly words. Not mine. |
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #121)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:51 PM
chervilant (8,267 posts)
132. Well, ViseGrip, you might appreciate this:
Someone will be unable to alert again for a wee while... |
Response to JTFrog (Reply #107)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:59 PM
chervilant (8,267 posts)
133. Flawlessly?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() (Snort, giggle, snicker, guffaw!!!) ![]() ![]() ![]() You just keep telling yourself that, frog. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:09 PM
R. Daneel Olivaw (12,606 posts)
111. How unsportsperson like.
But we all know it's her turn. I certainly hope her flameout is spectacular and send a message to the turd way. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:53 PM
farleftlib (2,125 posts)
114. Her majesty was displeased
Quelle surprise.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:14 PM
GeorgeGist (25,238 posts)
120. It's the kind of thing you expect ...
from Republicans.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:32 PM
RKP5637 (66,505 posts)
126. Yet another WTF!!!! n/t
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:45 PM
GoneOffShore (17,143 posts)
131. Would that she would turn and walk completely away.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:09 PM
riversedge (67,570 posts)
135. You have not posted a video. Where is your evidence??
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:12 PM
Nedsdag (2,437 posts)
136. The queen doesn't shake hands with minions.
"No She Can't!"
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:30 PM
2pooped2pop (5,420 posts)
137. sadly that's the same angle her supporters will see of her if she is electec
walking away and acting like she never heard of them. Promises? what promises?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:45 PM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
141. Million$ and million$ and still no class.
Still acting like a high school mean girl.
Very fucking "presidential" Hillary. ![]() ![]() |