Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:57 PM Jan 2016

We Now Know Why They Wanted To Limit Democratic Debates

Letting Bernie talk about health care for all Americans could really blow up in the faces of the ruling class.

Imagine all them "lost" profits.

Unacceptable.

You only get treated if it is profitable for your owners.

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Now Know Why They Wanted To Limit Democratic Debates (Original Post) scottie55 Jan 2016 OP
For-profit health care: the biggest reason why the insurance companies purchased the Clintons. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #1
They did in spades. malokvale77 Jan 2016 #16
not just health care. There are many topics the ruling class does not want discussed. nt antigop Jan 2016 #2
I Almost Mentioned Taxes scottie55 Jan 2016 #3
Like the Trans Pacific Partnership, for instance... PatrickforO Jan 2016 #51
Huge +1! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #77
Huge +1! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #76
Dying Anyone? scottie55 Jan 2016 #4
And look how much they wanted to make it all about guns. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #5
This... malokvale77 Jan 2016 #19
There is no reason for guns to even influence the vote. But, as you said, the PTB are using it to Enthusiast Jan 2016 #78
Clinton and big pharma? left-of-center2012 Jan 2016 #6
Do you know when the decision for six debates was made and who made the decision? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #7
And Decided To Avoid Prime Time scottie55 Jan 2016 #8
Do you know when and by whom the decision was made for six debates? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #9
The DNC Headed By Debbie Wasserman Schultz Limited Debates scottie55 Jan 2016 #11
crickets.... hopemountain Jan 2016 #20
I have seen her/him ask that question several times. malokvale77 Jan 2016 #22
I thought it might be you thought it was DWS, it was decided by Howard Dean when Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #29
It had nothing to do with Sanders - correct. tecelote Jan 2016 #31
Since Hillary has performed well in the debates more would be good for Hillary. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #39
So then, what was the reason? tecelote Jan 2016 #40
Read post #29, it was Howard Dean who made the decision and it did not Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #41
So you think it was incompetence? tecelote Jan 2016 #42
No, he said it himself, did not stutter when he said it. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #45
He said what? Still no answer. tecelote Jan 2016 #48
I have posted the answer in Post #29. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #50
No. You just explained that it was now Dean's fault and not Debbie's. tecelote Jan 2016 #54
Can you show where I said it was Dean's fault, don't rewrite my post, I am capable Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #80
Howard Dean is an ex-DNC-chairperson (2-12-05 - 1/21/09). He may give advice Cal33 Jan 2016 #69
How DARE you use logic and facts here! Amimnoch Jan 2016 #32
You are right, thanks. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #58
The fact is DWS has been chairperson for awhile Bradical79 Jan 2016 #59
DWS followed Howard Dean as chairperson, she followed Dean's decision, Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #62
Well, yeah Bradical79 Jan 2016 #63
Maybe so the DNC would not follow the clown car show of the GOP. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #64
It's unfortunate you think so little of Clinton Bradical79 Jan 2016 #65
Wrong, I hold Hillary in high esteem, I dont see a need in following Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #66
Makes sense. I'm convinced now. Bradical79 Jan 2016 #68
Who said anything about "dozens of debates?" Sanders and O'Malley asked for more Cal33 Jan 2016 #70
"when candidates does not change their positions?" MadDAsHell Jan 2016 #84
Which candidate does not change their position? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #91
Half-truths make the best lies.... Loudestlib Jan 2016 #55
What is the half truth? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #92
I don't get it Bradical79 Jan 2016 #56
This OP certainly falls under the category of the 'silly season' riversedge Jan 2016 #10
It's Not Silly To Schedule Debates When The Fewest People Possible scottie55 Jan 2016 #13
It's almost like they are hiding something. nt malokvale77 Jan 2016 #25
Desperation seems to be tagged to Hillary lately. tecelote Jan 2016 #15
Only in the bubble that Sanders fan live in. riversedge Jan 2016 #18
Now that's desperation! tecelote Jan 2016 #23
Double, double toil and trouble; yuiyoshida Jan 2016 #30
Classic! nice touch... nt. druidity33 Jan 2016 #37
Never quote the Scotish Play. salib Jan 2016 #47
Shakespeare is English yuiyoshida Jan 2016 #57
Old thespian superstition. salib Jan 2016 #60
O well done! I commend your pains! paleotn Jan 2016 #52
Or the goldfish bowl.... paleotn Jan 2016 #49
You mean Debbie's desperation not 840high Jan 2016 #24
Debbie's Desperate Debate Debacle davidpdx Jan 2016 #46
No, fantastical bizzaro world theories are helpful Dem2 Jan 2016 #67
Yup. Just shut up and die! Helen Borg Jan 2016 #12
Name a major social/political issue that does not boil down to "who has the money" libdem4life Jan 2016 #14
The Golden Rule scottie55 Jan 2016 #17
That is not a political issue, my friend, these are words of Jesus, as are The Beatitudes. libdem4life Jan 2016 #21
Jesus in Rome? As something other than a sculpture? HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #27
I have no idea what you are talking about. And I don't take kindly to what may be some sacriligious libdem4life Jan 2016 #33
No idea? Ok below is pasted the statement I am commenting on... HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #44
"Social/political issue...." This may not be a political issue, but it is definitely a social one. Cal33 Jan 2016 #72
That is true. However, our morality underlies everything we do...social, political, etc. libdem4life Jan 2016 #73
"They are crooks and always have been." malokvale77 Jan 2016 #26
I'd like to know how it came to pass that Bernie thereismore Jan 2016 #28
Didn't Bernie switch from I to DEM? Isn't that legal? Duval Jan 2016 #35
He had no chance. tecelote Jan 2016 #36
Hilarious scottie55 Jan 2016 #38
I see you are new here. Welcome to DU. Hope you will like it here. 35 years ago Cal33 Jan 2016 #74
Well, when 3 of the other 4 candidates are ex-Republicans... Bradical79 Jan 2016 #61
Wonder what you think of Warren... kjones Jan 2016 #82
I think she's great Bradical79 Jan 2016 #83
And that includes our Main Stream Media! Duval Jan 2016 #34
K & R !!! - It's ALL About The Money... WillyT Jan 2016 #43
K & R AzDar Jan 2016 #53
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #71
They limited the debates because the electorate would prefer Bernie to Hillary. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #75
What Useful service does the Insurance Industry fredamae Jan 2016 #79
If I'm not mistaken, the last debate had pretty good ratings... kjones Jan 2016 #81
Imagine If It Was Prime Time scottie55 Jan 2016 #85
Ah yes, the "enemy of the good" nt kjones Jan 2016 #87
Slave Economy billhicks76 Jan 2016 #86
Please Read The Shock Doctrine scottie55 Jan 2016 #88
What would the plutocrats do if they couldn't prey on the middle class and poor? raindaddy Jan 2016 #89
Bernie has the Big Mo. Expect Hillary to ask DNC (Sweet Debbie) for more NCjack Jan 2016 #90
I Don't Think More Or Fewer Debates Will Help Hillary Now scottie55 Jan 2016 #93
The only business UHC punishes awoke_in_2003 Jan 2016 #94
It's A Lot To Do With The "Big Government" Thing scottie55 Jan 2016 #95
 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
4. Dying Anyone?
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:10 PM
Jan 2016

Dying because you can't afford a doctor is a big thing to some people.

Not being able to take your sick child to a doctor.

How about making just a little too much to "qualify" for health care.

I had to garnish 2 employees for medical bills.

I know what happens when you get sick or injured and you don't have Cadillac coverage.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
5. And look how much they wanted to make it all about guns.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

Guns are a divisive issue that helps bring conservatives to the polls and scares blue collar white people in Flyover Country away from the Democrats, which is just what TPTB want.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
78. There is no reason for guns to even influence the vote. But, as you said, the PTB are using it to
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jan 2016

maintain their hold on the nation.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
6. Clinton and big pharma?
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:20 PM
Jan 2016

How much money has HRC taken from pharmaceutical companies and health insurance companies in speeches and campaign donations?

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
11. The DNC Headed By Debbie Wasserman Schultz Limited Debates
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jan 2016

To answer your question. Either she made the decision, or did so on behalf of others.

Most people suspect on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/democratic-party-hopes-no_b_8560342.html

Why do you ask?

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
22. I have seen her/him ask that question several times.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jan 2016

She/he never answers it.

You did however. Other members of the DNC have said as much.

Thank you.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
29. I thought it might be you thought it was DWS, it was decided by Howard Dean when
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jan 2016

He was chairperson, the decision had nothing to do with Sanders running or anything he has on his agenda. It has been said it was DWS and Hillary, please remember it was not DWS or Hillary.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
41. Read post #29, it was Howard Dean who made the decision and it did not
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jan 2016

Have anything to do with Sanders running since Sanders was not running at the time for president.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
42. So you think it was incompetence?
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jan 2016

You didn't really answer the question of why.

This is the first I've heard that it was not Debbie but it was Howard Dean. Is he being thrown under the bus again or is there a valid reason why?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
45. No, he said it himself, did not stutter when he said it.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jan 2016

It does not have anything to do with incompetence on the part of Dean, DWS or Hillary.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
54. No. You just explained that it was now Dean's fault and not Debbie's.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:05 PM
Jan 2016

Nothing about why fewer debates during low viewership time slots was thought to be a good idea.

Also... why did it take Debbie this long to mention it was Dean and not her?

Lots of posturing but no answer.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
80. Can you show where I said it was Dean's fault, don't rewrite my post, I am capable
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jan 2016

of writing myself, I did not rewrite yours. I would not "blame" Dean or DWS.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
69. Howard Dean is an ex-DNC-chairperson (2-12-05 - 1/21/09). He may give advice
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:12 AM
Jan 2016

at most, if asked, but he has no direct say in any DNC decisions today. There are
only 6 Democratic Primary Presidential debates this time. In 2007-2008, when
Dean was DNC chairman, there were 26 Primary Democratic Presidential debates,
and Hillary was running for president for the first time. Here's the link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_debates,_2008

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
32. How DARE you use logic and facts here!
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jan 2016


amusing hyperbole.. that's the best you can hope for here these days.

I can only imagine the horrendous disappointment when they realize that the Wizard of Vermont really just gave the scarecrow a piece of paper, not an actual brain.
 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
59. The fact is DWS has been chairperson for awhile
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jan 2016

I don't understand what Dean has to do with this. In the previous primaries Hillary Clinton attacked Barack Obama over not wanting more debates after they had 18 of them. The DNC then scheduled more debates. Why could that be done in '08 but not now? How is Dean relevant to the debates this year?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
62. DWS followed Howard Dean as chairperson, she followed Dean's decision,
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:58 PM
Jan 2016

She has been chairperson since 2011. BTW, Hillary did not run in 2012.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
63. Well, yeah
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jan 2016

So how is Dean relevant to her decision to not hold more debates and the terrible schedule? She's chair, she's responsible. It's 2016. Why would you stick to a schedule your predecessor came up with years earlier? In '08 Clinton demanded more debates and got more debates after there had been 18 or 19 of them. It's not that hard.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
64. Maybe so the DNC would not follow the clown car show of the GOP.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:26 AM
Jan 2016

Five candidates was on stage the first debate, three the other times, how many times is it necessary to answer the same questions ten times, twenty times, the DNC can be leaders, not followers. Where is having dozens of debates going to change the answers with candidates when candidates does not change their positions? How does this help the three candidates? The have been on talk shows, was ask the same questions, maybe there are more talk shows where they don't have to face off with the other candidates. In this primary process Hillary has won the debates, she spent eleven hours testifying before congress recently, she is not going to fall on her face.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
65. It's unfortunate you think so little of Clinton
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jan 2016

Having lots of debates in the previous Democratic primary cycle was wildly successful. Clinton even ran agressive ads demanding more debates after 18 or so. This preceeded a historic victory for the Democratic party. Not sure why you think more Clinton on tv would suddenly turn this into a GOP style clown show.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
66. Wrong, I hold Hillary in high esteem, I dont see a need in following
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 10:46 AM
Jan 2016

The GOP and their clown cars. It has been shown the DNC debates are much more productive than the GOP debates and the clown car. As a Democrat, we are better than following the GOP.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
68. Makes sense. I'm convinced now.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:07 AM
Jan 2016

I know when my prefered candidate is benefiting from televised debates, my first notion is to make sure there are the least amount of debates possible with the smallest viewing audiences. That's a real show of confidence.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
70. Who said anything about "dozens of debates?" Sanders and O'Malley asked for more
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jan 2016

debates. Just let them decide on the number. Hillary asked for more debates in 2008,
and she got them from Dean. Just give Sanders and O'Malley the same consideration,
which DWS did not do.

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
55. Half-truths make the best lies....
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:14 PM
Jan 2016

“I do not support the exclusivity clause,” said former DNC chair and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean in mid-October.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
56. I don't get it
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jan 2016

Dean was chairperson 6 or 7 years ago wasn't he? How can he be responsible for the 2015/2016 debate schedule?

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
13. It's Not Silly To Schedule Debates When The Fewest People Possible
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:04 PM
Jan 2016

Will be watching.

Especially since the contrast between our candidates and the nut jobs is so stark.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
15. Desperation seems to be tagged to Hillary lately.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie's closing in fast.

Celebration is Bernie's tag.

Silly season is over. That was when Hillary had a real lead and nothing else mattered. She lost that.

Bernie is winning and he is on the way to being President elect.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
23. Now that's desperation!
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jan 2016

'Trying to say we live in a bubble when the race is neck and neck.

Sanders surged and denying that is being in the bubble.

Try the reality based world. Silly season is over.

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
30. Double, double toil and trouble;
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jan 2016

Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,—
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.

Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.

Scale of dragon; tooth of wolf;
Witches' mummy; maw and gulf
Of the ravin'd salt-sea shark;
Root of hemlock digg'd i the dark;
Liver of blaspheming Jew;
Gall of goat, and slips of yew
Sliver'd in the moon's eclipse;
Nose of Turk, and Tartar's lips;
Finger of birth-strangled babe
Ditch-deliver'd by a drab,—
Make the gruel thick and slab:
Add thereto a tiger's chaudron,
For the ingrediants of our caldron.
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.

Cool it with a baboon's blood,
Then the charm is firm and good.

~~William Shakespeare

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
57. Shakespeare is English
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:17 PM
Jan 2016

is he not?
William Shakespeare (/ˈʃeɪkspɪər/;[1] 26 April 1564 (baptised) – 23 April 1616)[nb 1] was an English poet, playwright, and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare

paleotn

(17,912 posts)
49. Or the goldfish bowl....
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jan 2016

...inhabited by Hillbots? Now tell me, what exactly do you have against an additional 29 million Americans having healthcare coverage? With Bernie's solution, no one can make a buck off their health problems possibly?

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
14. Name a major social/political issue that does not boil down to "who has the money"
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jan 2016

It's like they taught us, until a sale is made, no one gets paid. Seems in politics it's the same, just accomplished a bit differently. I do not think Bernie's fixation on the billionaires is faulty. It is the lead goose in flight. The rest just file in formation.

How does anyone think we got in this fix anyway? Nixon Shock.

"The Nixon Shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, the most significant of which was the unilateral cancellation of the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock

The housing bubble arose from this series of actions. First just printing money, then it became securities and bonds, then some became phone, then......on and on and on....the Bailout....on and on and on...Somebody better get a handle on this. And it won't be anyone from the above mess of thieves and their henchmen and hench maidens.

Here's the truth. The banks don't have squat...aren't worth squat...some don't even have a penny on the dollar on their REAL books and the Emperor has no clothes. I'm pretty sure Bernie is smart enough to know this, and sees this as the opportunity for a political solution, rather than the crash that is currently impending. They have thought up so many clever ways to cover their lies and theft with more lies and theft to dupe people, it's without shame. They are crooks and always have been.

Bernie threatens this, and that's why I worry about him. He's leading the Pitchfork Voting Revolution.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
21. That is not a political issue, my friend, these are words of Jesus, as are The Beatitudes.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jan 2016

It is the Rule of Humankind. Cannot be compared to our political system, just as when Jesus was in Rome. Not much has changed. He said it is easier for a rich man to go through the eye of a needle than to go to heaven. I think that's where spirituality and politics/money part ways.

You don't want me to get started on this...my grad classes were in Theology.

I have done some comparison to the Beatitudes and the original intent of the Democratic Party and why I am a Democrat, and it is a bit consoling.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
33. I have no idea what you are talking about. And I don't take kindly to what may be some sacriligious
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:08 PM
Jan 2016

jest. If that's what it is. Don't respond.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
44. No idea? Ok below is pasted the statement I am commenting on...
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:39 PM
Jan 2016
Cannot be compared to our political system, just as when Jesus was in Rome.


As far as I know, there is no reference to Jesus, the man, ever being in Rome.

Which is why I asked. What are you referencing that says with authority that Jesus,the man, was in Rome?

I'm not asking for a copy of his passport, just where did you get that?
 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
72. "Social/political issue...." This may not be a political issue, but it is definitely a social one.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jan 2016
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
73. That is true. However, our morality underlies everything we do...social, political, etc.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

Someone quoted the Golden Rule and I expounded on it a bit...since I know a bit about that subject.

I even gave the Democratic Party a shout out for being the closest to the Beatitudes...the second most important tome attributed to Jesus.

But I don't argue it.

Peace Out

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
26. "They are crooks and always have been."
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:53 PM
Jan 2016
Bernie threatens this, and that's why I worry about him. He's leading the Pitchfork Voting Revolution.


I'm always reminded of her Bobby Kennedy remark in 2008.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
28. I'd like to know how it came to pass that Bernie
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jan 2016

was allowed to run on the D ticket. Who fucked that up? I bet Debbie has a lot to answer to the Clintons.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
36. He had no chance.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:10 PM
Jan 2016

A "Socialist", please!

Pretty funny that now.

As you said... Debbie has a lot to answer to the Clintons.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
38. Hilarious
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 09:13 PM
Jan 2016

Both Bernie and Hillary are real Democrats.

I don't know why Bernie called himself an independant. I don't know if I would want to be part of the oil, coal, Wall Street first party if I could help it.

Oops, forgot to mention war....

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
74. I see you are new here. Welcome to DU. Hope you will like it here. 35 years ago
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jan 2016

when Bernie began in politics, he saw that there were politicians, both Republican
and Democratic, who were being paid by and taking orders from the Corporate
Power people. He didn't want any part of that corruption. So he did not join
either of the two major parties.

But if you look up his record, beginning from the time he became Mayor of the
Capital of Vermont, you will see that he was always for the middle class and the
have-nots. You can also see from his voting record as US congressman and senator,
that he voted with the Democratic Progressives in the high 90s percent of the
time. His record shows that he is more of a Progressive Democrat than most
officially Democratic politicians.

He is a man of integrity -- a person we can trust to work for the American people,
not the greedy Corporate Power people -- which is a quality sadly lacking in many
politicians today.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
61. Well, when 3 of the other 4 candidates are ex-Republicans...
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:51 PM
Jan 2016

and the DNC chair endorsed Republicans herself, I think it's hard to raise a fuss over an independent liberal Senator joining the party and running too without looking silly

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
83. I think she's great
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jan 2016

She's not running so I didn't add her to the tally. The post is more about the hypocrisy of a faction of Clinton fans who like to call Bernie Sanders a fake Democrat or express confusion over why a liberal independent is allowed to join the party and run for office. I think O'Mally is the only one of the group of potential candidates that was a life long Democrat.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
75. They limited the debates because the electorate would prefer Bernie to Hillary.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

If the American people knew about single payer we would have already had it.

The media engaged in no less of a conspiracy in the single payer blackout than they did in cheer leading their way to the Iraq War.

How many of us are sick of the corporate ruling class and their bribed political guardians?

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
79. What Useful service does the Insurance Industry
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jan 2016

offer for the premiums we pay aside from Profits for CEO's/Shareholders?

kjones

(1,053 posts)
81. If I'm not mistaken, the last debate had pretty good ratings...
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

despite the name calling and conspiracy peddling that Bernie folks
tossed out beforehand.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
85. Imagine If It Was Prime Time
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jan 2016

And not in the middle of a holiday weekend. Twice the viewers maybe?

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
90. Bernie has the Big Mo. Expect Hillary to ask DNC (Sweet Debbie) for more
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

debates stop the hemorrhaging of her supporters -- no, strike that -- to explore in greater detail the issues facing the American people.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
93. I Don't Think More Or Fewer Debates Will Help Hillary Now
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

The Cat Is Out Of The Bag.

The idea of covering all Americans with health insurance is very powerful.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
94. The only business UHC punishes
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

is insurance companies. I cannot believe companies like GE or Walmart wouldn't be behind it. Most companies would save tons of money.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
95. It's A Lot To Do With The "Big Government" Thing
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jan 2016

I am sure.

They want EVERYTHING privatized.

And controlled by a handful of ass clowns.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We Now Know Why They Want...