2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHeads-Up !!! - The Clinton Team Is Writing 'Too Big To Fail' Out Of The Financial Crisis - HuffPo
The Clinton Team Is Writing 'Too Big To Fail' Out Of The Financial CrisisWhy grapple with history when you can just rewrite it?
Zach Carter, Jason Linkins, & Shahien Nasiripour - HuffPo
01/20/2016 04:55 pm ET

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has lately been talking about "too big to fail" banks like they didn't play a central role in cratering the economy a few years ago.
Lance Iversen/ASSOCIATED PRESS
<snip>
Heres a term you may remember from 2008: "too big to fail." It was the title of a best-selling book and an Emmy-nominated movie, and ultimately the foundation for a pretty terrible time in U.S. history when financial titans sent countless jobs, homes and taxpayer wealth into the economic afterlife.
That's not the kind of thing you just forget about -- unless you're really trying to. Somewhat disconcertingly, it seems that a lot of participants and observers of the 2016 Democratic Party primary are trying to forget, thanks to the efforts of Hillary Clinton's banking brain trust.
This week, Paul Krugman claimed that too big to fail was at best marginal" to the crash of 2008. Earlier this month, the economist Austan Goolsbee said on Twitter that "BIG wasn't what made Bear or Lehman dangerous. it was the ability to spill damage onto others." Former Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) even said Lehman was "very small" when it failed.
This has accompanied a broader barrage of Clinton rhetoric suggesting that Bernie Sanders' plan to break up big banks is a weak proposal that ignores her tough-as-nails shadow banking plan. Basically, the argument goes, "too big to fail" was never a serious problem, or at least the big part of it wasnt really a problem, and anyhow, Lehman Brothers wasnt very big.
Here's the problem: This is preposterous. In the Obama era, we've grown accustomed to evidence-blind nonsense from Republican politicians looking to protect big banks' profits. But it's a new level of sad when respected liberals start echoing the arguments proffered by Hamilton Place Strategies, a PR shop run by former George W. Bush Treasury spokesman Tony Fratto, who works on behalf of big banks. Krugman, Goolsbee et al. are essentially placing a Democratic Party seal of approval on corporate GOP rhetoric.
The Clinton camp's too big to fail denialism runs against the official conclusion of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, as well as the views of other top finance scholars. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson, former Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chair Sheila Bair, former bank bailout Inspector General Neil Barofsky and FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig have all maintained that "too big to fail" was, in fact, central to the crisis.
Every official who authorized the bailouts of 2008 and 2009 said they had no choice. They argued that letting big institutions fail would have ravaged the broader economy. The havoc that followed Lehman Brothers' 2008 bankruptcy demonstrates that this fear was legitimate.
"Everyone, including the administration, agrees...
<snip>
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-too-big-to-fail_us_569fd359e4b0875553c2a298
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)It's amazing what can be learned once the establishment becomes threatened.
draa
(975 posts)We've been saying for years our party is corrupt and a mirror image of the GOP. We were ignored and eventually marginalized.
The supporters today are mostly ass kissers who can't think for themselves. That's why you'll see the same meme or quip a million times a day on Democratic sites. It's gotten to where no one can do anything because you don't want to be the "odd" one in the crowd. Just follow each other like lemmings over a cliff (yes, I know they don't do that).
No free will is allowed in The New Democratic Party.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Shouldn't we just recognize that they are not capable of connecting any dots? Excuses are in their food pyramids. Protein, milk, fruits/veggies, grains, excuses.
I adopted this motto a few years back.

debunction.junction
(127 posts)I am all for a woman for President as long as her name is Elizabeth Warren. I never see Hillary supporters on Du actually speak to the issues when defending Hillary. Have no idea what they are actually for or against. Do they believe in private prisons? Do they believe in equal pay for women? Do they believe in a $15 minimum, which in my mind is still poverty wages? Do they believe that corporations are people? Do they believe in public funding of elections? Do they believe that money is free speech? Inquiring minds want to know.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)You'd get the same deflective non-answer nonsense Hillary would barf up. She HAS TO be cautious with what she says because her big bucks backers have their ears finely tuned to every utterance.
Welcome to DU, BTW.
draa
(975 posts)Qutzupalotl
(15,821 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,127 posts)Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)So many sheeple will fall for it too. Its not only bad for our country, its downright embarrassing as well.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)All on the list of "Us's" that Pantsuit will fight for.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Hillary says, "Cover it up, cover it up!"
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I guess she wants to make sure those Big Bank speaking fees will be rolling in after her political career ends.
Their internal polling must be even worse than what we are seeing.
elias49
(4,259 posts)Where are you? Call me!
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You laugh, but I suspect her advisers are working on it right now.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Legs Dimon and Pretty Boy Lloyd belong in the slammer and everyone except apologists from the banksters know that (of course, they do, too, but an occupational liar gotta lie).
Maybe next her team will argue that she was there when the slaves were freed on Juneteenth? You know, kinda like this . . .
[center]
[/center]
No, it wouldn't work that way. The historical revisionists who work for the American oligarchy will put the banksters in Baghdad (claiming the Iraq War was won by them).
WillyT
(72,631 posts)silenttigersong
(957 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Look at who's bankrolling her.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)It explains the confusion in the "progressive movement".
Hotler
(13,747 posts)and needs to be locked. Come on administration lock this thread and ban the poster.
Come on, really? Did you folks exspect any different? HRC is bought and paid for by the banksters.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)silenttigersong
(957 posts)
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)and an UGH.
Thanks WillyT.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)he has shown himself to be a political hack, economics is just his cover now.