The Nation: "Start Making Sense: Why We’ve Endorsed Bernie Sanders"

[Attorney in Texas]

Link to "Start Making Sense: Why We’ve Endorsed Bernie Sanders" (access podcast at link).

Here is an excerpt from the original endorsement:

A year ago, concerned that ordinary citizens would be locked out of the presidential nominating process, The Nation argued that a vigorously contested primary would be good for the candidates, for the Democratic Party, and for democracy. Two months later, Senator Bernie Sanders formally launched a campaign that has already transformed the politics of the 2016 presidential race. Galvanized by his demands for economic and social justice, hundreds of thousands of Americans have packed his rallies, and over 1 million small donors have helped his campaign shatter fund-raising records while breaking the stranglehold of corporate money. Sanders’s clarion call for fundamental reform—single-payer healthcare, tuition-free college, a $15-an-hour minimum wage, the breaking up of the big banks, ensuring that the rich pay their fair share of taxes—have inspired working people across the country. His bold response to the climate crisis has attracted legions of young voters, and his foreign policy, which emphasizes diplomacy over regime change, speaks powerfully to war-weary citizens. Most important, Sanders has used his insurgent campaign to tell Americans the truth about the challenges that confront us. He has summoned the people to a “political revolution,” arguing that the changes our country so desperately needs can only happen when we wrest our democracy from the corrupt grip of Wall Street bankers and billionaires.

We believe such a revolution is not only possible but necessary—and that’s why we’re endorsing Bernie Sanders for president. This magazine rarely makes endorsements in the Democratic primary (we’ve done so only twice: for Jesse Jackson in 1988, and for Barack Obama in 2008). We do so now impelled by the awareness that our rigged system works for the few and not for the many. Americans are waking up to this reality, and they are demanding change. This understanding animates both the Republican and Democratic primaries, though it has taken those two contests in fundamentally different directions.

At the core of this crisis is inequality, both economic and political. The United States has become a plutocracy—one in which, as Sanders puts it, “we not only have massive wealth and income inequality, but a power structure which protects that inequality.” America’s middle class has melted away, while the gap between rich and poor has reached Gilded Age extremes. The recovery that followed the 2008 economic collapse has not been shared. Indeed, in the United States it seems that nothing is shared these days—not prosperity, nor security, nor even responsibility. While millions of Americans grapple with the consequences of catastrophic climate change, fossil-fuel companies promote climate skeptics so that they can continue to profit from the planet’s destruction. While Americans have tired of endless war, the military-industrial complex and its cheerleaders continue to champion the reckless interventions that have drained our country, damaged our reputation abroad, and created a perfect storm of Pentagon waste, fraud, and abuse. While Americans of every ideological stripe recognize the need for criminal-justice reform, African-American men, women, and children continue to be gunned down by police officers on the streets, and mass incarceration continues largely unabated.

Americans are fed up and fighting back. Seen in isolation, the Fight for $15, Black Lives Matter, the climate-justice movement, the immigrant-rights movement, the campaign for a financial-transactions tax, and the renewed push for single-payer healthcare may seem like unrelated causes. Taken together, they form a rising chorus of outrage over a government that caters to the demands of the super-wealthy, while failing to meet the needs of the many. They share a fury at a politics captured by special interests and big money, where pervasive corruption mocks the very notion of democracy.

Senator Sanders alone has the potential to unite the movements emerging across the country.

[libdem4life]

1. Bernie and Jane...what an adorable and loving couple. Reminds me of the Obamas.

[roguevalley]

7. Jane must be freaking. :D I would. :D

[libdem4life]

17. You'd never know it by that amazing smile. I'm sure most of her "freaking out" was during

the decision-making process. That was an interesting story. She's definitely worthy of taking over Michelle's larger-than-life position in the Obama Administration.

[restorefreedom]

15. i just love these two.

what a wonderful first couple they will be!

[libdem4life]

18. Indeed. The external energy and the inner warmth between them...it's obvious.

[restorefreedom]

19. yes, and just like with mr and mrs o,

its obvious that they completely love each other. so genuine.

[Uncle Joe]

2. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, Attorney in Texas.

[daleanime]

3. K&R.....

[Docreed2003]

4. Katrina was on Sirius/XM Progress the other morning explaining this endorsement....

I think supporters of all three dem candidates should go and track down this interview on "The Agenda". She was very clear in saying that the Democratic Party has, for too long, negotiated from a position of compromise in an attempt to bring the GOP to the bargaining table. The result being, if you compromise the ideal from the outset then the result will be far less than what was hoped for, her main example being the use of the public option as a bargaining chip during ACA negotiations. While compromise is most certainly an important part of American political life, we cannot afford to cede ground just to appease the right. In giving up what we are willing to compromise for, we move our party further to the right. For that reason, they chose to endorse Sen Sanders; not because he has unrealistic ideals, but because they believe he wouldn't negotiate away reasonable compromises before debate begins. I strongly recommend anyone who is interested to look up this interview.

[99th_Monkey]

5. K&R The Nation: a steadfastly progressive publication since 1865 ... awesome endorsement. nt

[Paka]

6. K&R

[leftcoastmountains]

8. K&R

[burrowowl]

9. K&R!!!!!!

And I subscribe to The Nation, you should to!

[Old Codger]

10. This is what we need

And this is what HRC and her minions are fighting against, this is REAL capitol D Democrats, fighting to be able to represent the underdogs, that also happen to be the majority. It is time to really stand up and really take OUR country back, not the country the R's and the TB's seem to want but the REALAmerica that was once something to be proud of and had some respect around the world not the acrimonious contempt and hatred that we now are held in..

[senz]

11. Glad to see this.

Thanks, Attorney in Texas!

[Duckfan]

12. Yes. An America in the vision of FDR and Dr. King

[emsimon33]

13. K&R

[raouldukelives]

14. K&R We live in the most reality individual shareholders cannot block.

And thus, the most honesty, the most change, the most democracy, that they will allow to trickle down to the rest of the world.

Behind every attack, whether by weapon or by amendment, stands a shareholder eager for personal returns.

[LWolf]

16. K & R